227,179 research outputs found
Antipoesia em Lear rey & mendigo de Nicanor Parra
No full textTese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Comunicação e Expressão, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Literatura, Florianópolis, 2009A presente tese é resultado de uma pesquisa de natureza qualitativa sobre Lear rey & mendigo (2005), tradução livre de Rei Lear de Shakespeare, elaborada pelo poeta chileno Nicanor Parra (1914-). Preparada inicialmente para sua encenação em 1992 pela Escola de Teatro da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Chile, com direção de Alfredo Castro, estuda-se como a tradução e a encenação de Lear rey & mendigo são parte do próprio projeto antipoético parriano denominado antipoesia, ou, como essa obra sintetiza, conforme Raúl Zurita, a totalidade da proposta antipoética, ao mesmo tempo em que se configura como uma sorte de teoria geral dela. Para sua análise, pensa-se, principalmente, na leitura efetuada pelo crítico chileno César Cuadra, que situa a antipoesia em um contexto complexo e transmoderno da escritura, isto é, não restrito ao das produções poéticas no sentido estético ou artístico do termo, mas como um sistema multidimensional complexo que pensa a atual crise de legitimação dos relatos (e não só os provenientes da modernidade) na cena contemporânea, cena esta caracterizada pelo intenso desenvolvimento da cultura tecnocientífica. Cuadra expõe a antipoesia como uma desconstrução complexa de toda escritura, ou, conforme a denominação de Parra, como ecopoesía: a ecologização dos signos realizada através da complexidade dos relatos, operação esta conceituada por Edgar Morin. Para a análise da performance, priorizam-se os estudos de Patrice Pavis sobre a análise dos espetáculos e a tradução para a cena. Compuseram o acervo básico da pesquisa diversos documentos publicados a partir de 1991, como a gravação em vídeo do espetáculo adquirida junto ao Arquivo Iconográfico do Teatro Chileno da Escola de Teatro da Universidade Católica, e o número 103 (primavera 1991/outono 1992) da revista Apuntes, publicação da Escola de Teatro, além de diversas resenhas, notícias e entrevistas publicadas na imprensa, principalmente no jornal chileno El Mercurio. Acompanha a pesquisa uma entrevista com César Cuadra sobre a antipoesia parriana
Ancora un contributo per Kaulonia, tra vecchie e nuove ricerche. Una premessa
No full textIntroduzione e presentazione delle linee portanti del volume: M. C. PARRA (a cura di), Kaulonía, Caulonia, Stilida (e oltre). Contributi storici, archeologici e topografici, II, Pisa 2007
DE LA PARRA, M.
No full textM. de la Parra, Secretario del Partido Revolucionario Ignacio Zaragoza de Matamoros, Pue., le transcribe mensaje al Gral. PEC que le dirigió al gobierno de ese Estado, protestando por la nulificación de elecciones del Ayuntamiento y pide su intervención para evitar una acción de imposición secreta
Loboneris Carrera-Parra, 2006, gen. nov.
No full textLoboneris gen. nov. Type species. Lumbrineris pterignatha Gallardo, 1968 Etymology. The name of the genus is in honor of Jos M. (Lobo) Orensanz in recognition of his publications on polychaetes; mainly for his studies on eunicemorphs. Diagnosis. Prostomium without antennae, without eyes; notopodia slightly developed; without branchiae; composite and simple multidentate hooded hooks present; pygidium with anal cirri; maxillary apparatus with four pairs of maxillae, carriers longer than MI, joined to half of base of MI; MI forceps-like without inner accessory teeth, wide base, without attachment lamella; MII as long as MI, with ligament, without attachment lamella and connecting plates; MIII completely pigmented, wide attachment lamella along entire lateral edge; MIV wing-shaped, with colourless central area. Mandible with shaft partly separated.Published as part of Carrera-Parra, Luis F., 2006, Phylogenetic analysis of Lumbrineridae Schmarda, 1861 (Annelida: Polychaeta), pp. 1-36 in Zootaxa 1332 on page 27, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17424
Métricas de autor Angélica María Parra Báez
No full textInforme de las métricas de autor de la Dra. Angélica María Parra Báez de las publicaciones indexadas en Google Académico cuyo objetivo es entregar un insumo para el fortalecimiento de las capacidades y potencialidades de los autores de la Universidad Santo Tomás en el posicionamiento y visibilidad de sus publicacionesReport of the author metrics of Angélica María Parra Báez of the publications indexed in Google Scholar whose objective is to provide an input for the strengthening of the capacities and potentialities of the authors of the Santo Tomás University in the positioning and visibility of their publications.http://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.c
Nicanor Parra y El Objet Trouvé
No full textEste texto es una reseña testimonio vivo y revelador de una de las voces más impactantes de la literatura iberoamericana, Nicanor Parra, visto desde la mirada del también poeta Theodoro Elssaca Aboid. Parra, el popular poeta antipoeta, irrumpe en el mundo cultural con la fuerza de su particular lenguaje, el cual no se limita a la palabra sino que incluye la acción, los objetos y diversos contextos kinéticos. Sin embargo, más allá de la ironía o de la ubicación de su obra dentro de la llamada postmodernidad, el escritor Theodoro, amigo y conocedor de su trayectoria artística, lo relaciona con algunos clásicos del arte, encontrando en la tradición dadaísta su más cercana identidad y en su Chile natal, la raíz de su postura crítica frente al mundo. Señala además, que sus trabajos objetuales entran en sintonía con el universo expresionista y filosófico, porque el poeta es un defensor de una conciencia vital de respeto a la naturaleza y a lo humano, de allí, su abierto rechazo a la guerra
Recommended from our members
Kenedy Estate -La Parra Mansion
No full textKenedy Estate -La Parra Mansion where Sarita Kenedy live
Lumbrineris luciliae Martins, Carrera-Parra, Quintino & Rodrigues, 2012, sp. nov.
No full textLumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. Figure 3 Material examined. Type material: Holotype (MNHN TYPE 1539) southern Portuguese continental shelf, site PC201, 37º02.860ʹ N 8 º 25.285 ʹ W, April 2008, in fine sand, 32.7 m. Paratypes: MB 29 -000229, 1 specimen, site PC 125. ECOSUR0129, 1 specimen, site PC 191. DBUA 0 1317.01, 1 specimen, site MESH 3 D. Additional material: site MESH 24 D, 1 specimen; site PC85, 1 specimen; site PC92, 2 specimens; site PC187, 3 specimens; site PC188, 1 specimen; site PC191, 2 specimens; site PC193, 2 specimens; site PC196, 2 specimens; site PC203, 1 specimen; site PC219, 1 specimen. Description. Holotype mature male complete with 121 chaetigers (last 17 chaetigers regenerating), LT=52.0 mm, L 10 = 4.7 mm, W 10 = 1.8 mm. Prostomium subconical, as long as wide, with a pair of nuchal organs, ventrally with short buccal lips. Peristomium with two rings, anterior ring twice as long as second one (Fig. 3 A). All parapodia well developed, first six smaller than following ones. Prechaetal lobe in first parapodia inconspicuous, in chaetigers 2–10 as a small globular protuberance, conical in posterior chaetigers; always smaller than postchaetal lobe. Postchaetal lobe digitiform in parapodia 1, digitiform wide basally from parapodia 2 to 28; in posterior chaetigers digitiform; larger in anterior and posterior parapodia; always longer than prechaetal lobe (Fig. 3 B–D). Short rounded dorsal cirri in all parapodia. Composite multidentate hooded hooks in chaetigers 1 –21, 3– 8 per parapodium, with short blade, with up to 9 teeth, all of similar size (Fig. 3 E). Simple multidentate hooded hooks from chaetiger 21, with short hood, with up to 7 teeth, proximal tooth largest; preacicular hook with a section that is twice as large as the postacicular hook (Fig. 3 F). Dorsal limbate chaetae in chaetigers 1–82, ventral limbate chaetae in chaetigers 1–21. Aciculae yellow, aristate, distally curved in median and posterior parapodia (Fig. 3 G), up to five in anterior parapodia and two in posterior parapodia. Pygidium with terminal anus, with two pairs of anal cirri of similar size. Mandible divided for about half its length. Maxillary apparatus with five pairs of maxillae; maxillary carriers as long as MI. MI forceps-like with attachment lamella well developed. MII as long as MI, with wide connecting plates slightly developed; with four teeth of similar size. MIII arcuate, unidentate. MIV unidentate, with welldeveloped plate. MV free, prominent, lateral to MIV and MIII (Fig. 3 H). Variations. The specimens examined ranged in L 10 from 2.2 to 6.3 mm, in W 10 from 0.6 to 1.8 mm and varied in the following features: the last appearance of the composite multidentate hooded hooks and ventral limbates and the first simple multidentate hooded hooks (from chaetigers 14 to 21; cf. Table 2). Reproduction. One mature male was found (Holotype MNHN TYPE 1539) in April; the sperm cells have a long tail and a head with a subspherical nucleus, which diameter ranging from 2 to 3 µm. Type locality. Southern Portuguese continental shelf. Etymology. This species is named in honor of Lucília Gonçalves, mother of the first author. Distribution and habitat. Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. occurred in several sediment types from gravel to mud, characterized by high sand and biogenic contents, on average, 65 % and 8 % respectively (cf. Table 3). The species is distributed on the whole Portuguese continental shelf, but mainly in the southern part, at water depths ranging from 33 to 179 m (cf. Table 3). The species seems to occur mainly in biogenically enriched sediments. The biogenic fraction of the sediment is mainly composed of skeletal remains of molluscs, echinoderms or other fauna. Those mixed sediments may play some role in the creation of a favorable predator habitat and/or a protective habitat to these specimens, which are bigger than the other new species (based on the W 10 and L 10 values). Discussion. Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. belongs to a group of species characterized by having an arcuate unidentate MIII, including L. kerguelensis Grube (from Kerguelen Islands), L. cingulata Ehlers (from Magellanic biogeographic province), L. vanhoeffeni Michaelsen (from Greenland), L. paucidentata Treadwell (from Florida, USA), L. californiensis Hartman (from California, USA), L. cruzensis Hartman (from California, USA), L. pallida Hartman (from California, USA), L. inhacea Hartman (from Mozambique channel), L. aniara Fauchald (from Western Norway), L. nonatoi Ramos (from Mediterranean Sea), L. imajimai Carrera-Parra (from Shimoda, Japan), L. indica Carrera-Parra (from Saint Paul Island), L. higuchiae Carrera-Parra (from Shimoda, Japan), L. mustaquimi Carrera-Parra (from Pakistan), L. nishii Carrera-Parra (from Shimoda, Japan), L. geldiayi Carrera-Parra, Çinar & Dagli (from Turkey) and L. sinensis Cai & Li (from China). Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. has yellow aciculae, whereas L. pallida, L. geldiayi and L. nishii have reddish or dark aciculae. Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. has postchaetal lobe digitiform wide basally in anterior parapodia; while L. nonatoi, L. vanhoeffeni, L. mustaquimi, L. indica, L. paucidentata, L. higuchiae have a digitiform postchaetal lobe, and L. aniara, L. cingulata, L. californiensis, L. imajimai, L. inhacea, L. cruzensis and Lumbrineris pinaster sp. nov have an auricular postchaetal lobe. Additionally, the postchaetal lobes of Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. are always longer than the prechaetal lobes, while in L. californiensis, L. imajimai, L. inhacea, L. cruzensis, L. nonatoi and L. sinensis, the prechaetal lobe is as long as or longer than the postchaetal lobes in the posterior parapodia. Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. resembles L. cingulata by having preacicular simple multidentate hooded hooks with a section that are twice as large as the postacicular hooks. However, Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. differs having aciculae distally curved in median posterior parapodia rather than straight. Furthermore, Lumbrineris luciliae sp. nov. differs from L. cingulata by having MIV unidentate with a well-developed plate, whereas L. cingulata has MIV unidentate with a long prominent tooth, without a well-developed plate.Published as part of Martins, Roberto, Carrera-Parra, Luis F., Quintino, Victor & Rodrigues, Ana Maria, 2012, Lumbrineridae (Polychaeta) from the Portuguese continental shelf (NE Atlantic) with the description of four new species, pp. 1-21 in Zootaxa 3416 on pages 10-12, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21369
Lepidonopsis barnichae Salazar-Silva & Carrera-Parra, 2014, sp. nov.
No full textLepidonopsis barnichae sp. nov. Figures 4–6 Lepidonopsis humilis.— Pettibone 1977: 50 –54, figures 5 a–f (partim); Gómez et al. 1997: 1070 (non Augener, 1922). Lepidonotus sp. 3. — Salazar-Silva 2006: 154, 156. Material examined. Type material: Holotype ECOSUR0164, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico, Angosta beach, 16 ° 50 ' 30.90 " N, 99 ° 54 ' 54.33 " W, in oyster Spondylus calcifer, 4 March. 2009, coll. S.I. Salazar-Vallejo & L.F. Carrera-Parra. Paratypes ECOSUR0165, Acapulco, Guerrero, Hornos beach, 16 ° 51 ' 6.4 ″ N 99 ° 54 ′ 1 ″ W, in sponge, coll. S.I. Salazar-Vallejo & L.F. Carrera-Parra, 20 Apr. 2008, 1 spm. ECOSUR0166, Acapulco, Guerrero, Hornos beach, 16 ° 51 ′ 6.4 ″ N 99 ° 54 ′. 1 ″ W, in oyster Spondylus calcifer, 19 Apr. 2008, coll. S.I. Salazar-Vallejo & L.F. Carrera-Parra, 1 spm. ECOSUR0167 Acapulco, Guerrero, Hornos beach, 16 ° 51 ′ 6.4 " N 99 ° 54 ′ 1 ″, in oyster Spondylus calcifer, 19 Apr. 2008, coll. S.I. Salazar-Vallejo & L.F. Carrera-Parra, 1 spm. Additional material examined. Guerrero, Acapulco: Cantiles, La Quebrada, coll. A. Medina, in oyster, 26 May. 2000, 8 m, ECOSUR-P2670, 2 spm. Cantiles, Quebrada, Coll. A. Medina, in oyster 25 May. 2000, 15 m, ECOSUR-P2671, 2 spm. La Condesa, coll. Salazar-Vallejo, in oyster, 27 Nov. 1999, ECOSUR-P2672, 2 spm. Oaxaca: La Entrega, Coll. L. Mitchell, 0 1 Aug. 1986, ECOSUR-P1383, 1 spm. Diagnosis. Segment 2 dorsally projected over the prostomium as a single small lobe (Fig. 4 B). Elytra with conical macrotubercles (Fig. 5 B, E, F), tuft of papillae on dorsal surface isolated from the principal fringe of papillae (Fig. 5 A, C–D), first three pairs of elytra with macrotubercles larger and slightly curved (Fig. 5 B–F) than in remaining elytra; neurochaetae with bidentate tip. Description. Holotype ECOSUR0164, mature female, complete with 26 segments. Body of uniform width, length 7 mm, width 2 mm. Prostomium bilobed, wider than long, without prostomial peaks. Median antenna brown, inserted frontally, with cylindrical ceratophore, style missing; two lateral antennae, inserted terminally, fused to distal end of prostomium as prolongations of prostomial lobes, without ceratophores or styles. Two pairs of dark eyes, anterior pair larger than posterior, inserted dorsolaterally at widest part of prostomium; posterior pair near posterior margin of prostomium. Palps smooth with dark brown pigmentation (Fig. 4 A–B). Pharynx not everted. Tentacular segment not visible dorsally. Tentaculophores inserted lateral to prostomium, with slender chaetae. Tentacular cirri missing. Segment two projected dorsally over prostomium as a small lobe (Fig. 4 B); parapodia directed forward; ventral oral cirri longer than following. Elytra 12 pairs, on segments 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23; last three segments with dorsal cirri. Elytra covering dorsum completely; overlapping medially and posteriorly (Fig. 4 A); brown spots over surface except elytrophore area, darker on anterior elytra. All elytra with fringe of marginal papillae, tuft of papillae on dorsal surface isolated from fringe (Fig. 5 A, C–D). First pair of elytra rounded, almost circular (Fig. 5 A); surface with sclerotized macrotubercles and microtubercles, abundant digitiform micropapillae around each macrotubercle. Macrotubercles conical with tips slightly curved, wide areoles at base, largest over elytrophore area (Fig. 5 B); microtubercles conical with wide areole. Second and third pair of elytra reniform (Fig. 5 C), posterior elytra oval (Fig. 5 D). Dorsal surface with digitiform papillae, macrotubercles and microtubercles sclerotized; macrotubercles subconical, shorter than on second and third pair of elytra, distally blunt (Fig. 5 E); microtubercles similar to macrotubercles, flattened where elytra overlap. Parapodia biramous (Fig. 4 C). Notopodia smaller than neuropodia, with short acicular lobe. Neuropodia with prechaetal lobe slightly projecting, postchaetal lobe shorter; distally rounded with abundant filiform papillae. Dorsal cirri with cirrophore basally expanded, with digitiform papillae distally; style tapering to filiform tip, without papillae, brown pigmentation at base (Fig. 4 C). Elytrophores wider than dorsal tubercles. Ventral cirri tapering to filiform tip. Notochaetae slender, surface with rows of spines, tapering to capillary tip. Neurochaetae with two or three rows of spines on upper region, tips bidentate, main tooth thick, subdistal tooth smaller (Fig. 4 D). Nephridial papillae present from segment 6, larger on median and posterior segments, also elongated on ovigerous specimens. Anus dorsal, pygidium with papillae on margin, anal cirri missing. Oocytes 50–150 Μm in diameter, present from segment 11, including the parapodia. Variation. Specimens examined varied in length from 4 to 13 mm, and in width from 1 to 3 mm. In some specimens the antennae, palps, and venter have dark brown pigmentation, in others it is lighter and diffuse. In some specimens the macrotubercles on the first pair of elytra are truncated cones (Fig. 5 F), in other specimens, they are conical with tips curved. Barcode. Nucleotide sequences between 653-661 bp of the section of COI gene used for barcoding were obtained from the holotype and paratypes. The average evolutionary divergence over the four sequence pairs was 1 %. Discussion. Lepidonopsis barnichae sp. nov. resembles L. humilis by having bidentate neurochaetae and smooth palps, while L. collinifer has unidentate neurochaetae and minutely papillated palps. L. barnichae sp. nov. differs from the other two Lepidonopsis species by having segment 2 dorsally projected over the prostomium as a single small lobe, whereas L. humilis has two lobes on segment 2, and L. collinifer lacks these projections. L. barnichae sp. nov. has conical and slightly curved macrotubercles, while these are hemispherical and covered by small nodules in L. humilis and conical in L. collinifer. Furthermore, all elytra of L. barnichae sp. nov. have an abundant tuft of short or long papillae on the dorsal surface, isolated from the principal fringe of papillae (Fig. 5 A, C–D). In L. humilis the tuft is present only on the first pair of elytra, while in L. collinifer this tuft of papillae is absent. The morphological differentiation between L. barnichae sp. nov. and L. humilis was supported by the barcoding data which showed a genetic divergence of 17.5 % (Fig. 6). Previous studies have concluded that sequence divergences among closely related species of polychaetes vary between 8.4 % to 12.9 % (Jones et al. 2008; Vrijenhoek et al. 2009; Tovar-Hernández & Carrera-Parra 2011; Carrera-Parra & Salazar-Vallejo 2011; Yáñez- Rivera & Carrera-Parra 2012). Etymology. This species is named in honor of Dr. Ruth Barnich, in recognition of her many contributions on the taxonomy of Polynoidae. Type locality. Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico. Distribution. Mexican Pacific from Acapulco to Oaxaca.Published as part of Salazar-Silva, Patricia & Carrera-Parra, Luis Fernando, 2014, Revision of Lepidonopsis humilis (Augener, 1922) and description of L. barnichae sp. nov. (Annelida: Polychaeta: Polynoidae) based upon morphological and molecular characters, pp. 555-566 in Zootaxa 3790 (4) on pages 562-565, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3790.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/22486
Helmutneris corallicola Carrera-Parra, 2006, sp. nov.
No full textHelmutneris corallicola sp. nov. (Figures 5 A–E) Material examined. Type material: Holotype (MNHN TYPE 1478), Philippine Islands, 14 °03.0’ N 120 ° 11.5 E, 224 m, associated with Flabellum lamellulosum Alcock, 1902, cruise Musorstom 3, Station 92, 31 May 1985; paratype (MNHN TYPE 1477), same data as for holotype, 1 specimen. Non-type material: Philippine Islands, 14 °00.4’ N 120 ° 17.8 E, 192 m, associated with Flabellum lamellulosum Alcock, 1902, cruise Musorstom 3, Station 86, 31 May 1985, 1 specimen (MNHN). Etymology. The name of the species combines the common name of the host and the suffix indicates that it lives in it. Description. Holotype incomplete with 100 chaetigers, L 10 =3.5 mm, W 10 =1.6 mm. Paratype incomplete with 43 chaetigers, L 10 =3.3 mm, W 10 =1.4 mm. Prostomium short, slightly wider than long, with pair of nuchal organs, ventrally with well developed buccal lips. Peristomium shorter than prostomium, first ring longer than second. All parapodia well developed, first four smaller than following. Prechaetal lobe inconspicuous, rounded in all parapodia; postchaetal lobes in parapodia 1–25 digitiform, basally inflated, slightly longer than prechaetal lobe, from parapodium 26 digitiform, shorter than anterior (Figures 5 A–B). All parapodia with small, globular notopodia, with notoaciculae. Simple multidentate hooded hooks from chaetiger 1, in anterior parapodia with up to 7 teeth, all of similar size (Figure 5 C); in median and posterior parapodia with up to 8 teeth, proximal tooth largest, denticulated (Figure 5 D); dorsal limbate chaetae in chaetigers 1–21, ventral limbate chaetae in chaetigers 1–12. Aciculae yellow, aristate, up to three in anterior parapodia and two in posterior ones. Mandible translucent, fused for about half its length. Maxillary apparatus with four pairs of maxillae (Figure 5 E); maxillary carriers black, shorter than MI, joined to the base of MI. MI forceps-like, with attachment lamella. MII as long as MI, with ligament, left maxilla with five teeth and right maxilla with six teeth (paratype with five teeth in both maxillae); with narrow attachment lamella along 1 / 3 of posterior lateral edge. MIII with whitish central area, unidentate, and wide attachment lamella along 1 / 4 of posterior lateral edge. MIV with whitish central area, unidentate. Distribution. Philippine Islands. Remarks. H. corallicola sp. nov. is the second species of the genus and differs from H. flabellicola (Fage, 1936) in the shape of the prechaetal and postchaetal lobes.Published as part of Carrera-Parra, Luis F., 2006, Phylogenetic analysis of Lumbrineridae Schmarda, 1861 (Annelida: Polychaeta), pp. 1-36 in Zootaxa 1332 on page 21, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17424
- …
