269,694 research outputs found

    Letters supporting Appalachian National Park movement

    No full text
    Various organizations expressed support for an Appalachian National Park. A movement for a national park in the Appalachians was spearheaded by Appalachian National Park Association, formed in 1899. The association raised public awareness of the issue, but disbanded before the formation of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    B. Park Building - 1914-1939 Fd 01 #10

    No full text
    John R. Park Building

    B. Park Building - 1930-1939 Fd 01 #18

    No full text
    John R. Park Building

    [Envelope from Corporal Park B. Fielder, 1945]

    No full text
    An envelope from Corporal Park B. Fielder addressed to Reverend and Mrs. C. B. Fielder and sent on June 9, 1945. A stamp in the lower-left corner says "Passed by U.S. Army Examiner 41073.

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Memorandum to Appalachian National Park Association membership

    No full text
    This 3-page memorandum was written in September 1901 by Appalachian National Park Association president George S. Powell (b. 1848). Powell includes a summary of the association’s accomplishments to date as well as a quote by Senator Pritchard advocating a letter writing campaign. Jeter Connelly Pritchard (1857-1921) was a North Carolina Republican Senator and supporter of the efforts of the Appalachian National Park Association

    Letters supporting Appalachian National Park movement

    No full text
    Various organizations and individuals expressed support for an Appalachian National Park. A movement for a national park in the Appalachians was spearheaded by Appalachian National Park Association, formed in 1899. The association raised public awareness of the issue, but disbanded before the formation of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    Willamalane Park & Recreation District : Lively Park master plan

    No full text
    38 pp. Includes maps. Adopted September 28, 2005. Captured March 20, 2007.The Lively Park Master Plan identifies and documents the long-term, desired development of Jack B. Lively Memorial Park (Lively Park), home of Splash! Lively Park Swim Center, in East Springfield. The purpose of the master plan is to: provide guidance for future decision-making regarding capital expenditures for site improvements; provide the advance planning and information that is typically required for the preparation of grant applications; and provide some direction for future decision-making regarding site management issues. [From the Plan

    First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt Visits Smokies

    No full text
    This photocopy includes a Department of the Interior memorandum regarding a visit to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park by First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt. The visit took place over three days in April 1937. Arno B. Cammerer was the Director of the National Park Service during this time

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore