1,720,960 research outputs found
Neuroinflammation-Modulating Properties Combining Glutathione, N-Acetylcysteine, and Uridine Monophosphate in a Formulation Supplement: An In Vitro Study
Background: Neuropathic pain is a complex condition often resistant to current therapies due to limited efficacy and adverse effects. Nutraceuticals offer promising alternatives, combining antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties with good tolerability. This study aimed to compare the effects of a commercial nutraceutical formulation, SUPERALA CARNITINE® (Pharma Suisse Laboratories SpA, Milan, Italy), containing Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA), with a novel formulation, called SUPERALA CARNITINE® Forte, where ALA and vitamin B6 were replaced by N-acetylcysteine (NAC), Glutathione (GSH), and Uridine monophosphate (UMP). Methods: An indirect gut–peripheral nerve axis was employed to simulate oral absorption, metabolism, and effect on nervous tissues using 3D in vitro models. Both formulations and their individual components were assessed for cytotoxicity and permeability in the gut model (Caco-2 cells in Transwell®) and, after gut metabolism, for antioxidant capacity, anti-inflammatory activity, and neuroprotective potential in the peripheral nerve model. Results: SUPERALA CARNITINE® Forte improved cell viability and favoured the maintenance of intestinal integrity, showing enhanced permeability, and significantly reduced oxidative stress (OS) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-2) at the peripheral nervous system. In addition, it increased levels of neuronal markers (p75, MPZ, NRG1, ERβ) and decreased NaV1.7 and NaV1.8 activity, indicating greater neuroprotection and analgesic modulation than the ALA-based formula.
Conclusions: The replacement of ALA and vitamin B6 with NAC, GSH, and UMP produced favorable responses in vitro on neuronal cells, supporting a hypothetical potential interest in this nutraceutical combination and justifying further future in vivo investigations
Improved Iron Uptake and Metabolism Through Combined Heme and Non-Heme Iron Supplementation: An In Vitro Study
Iron is essential for numerous physiological processes, including oxygen transport, energy
metabolism, and immune function. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of three iron
formulations combining heme and non-heme iron, comparing them with existing market
products and the original form of iron. The formulations tested were GlobiFer® Forte, a
combination of heme and non-heme iron containing 18 mg of elemental iron (hereinafter
referred to as nutraceutical product 1); GlobiFer®, a combination of heme and non-heme
iron containing 14 mg of elemental iron (hereinafter referred to as nutraceutical product
2); and a double dose of nutraceutical product 2. Using an in vitro 3D intestinal barrier
model, all three formulations significantly increased tight junction protein expression and
TEER values, indicating preserved barrier integrity. Iron absorption analysis revealed
that all three iron formulations had higher absorption rates than controls. Nutraceutical
product 1 showed the highest absorption, associated with increased expression of the iron
transporters such as the primary non-heme iron transporter, DMT1, and the leading apical
heme transporter, HCP-1. All three new formulations increased ferritin and ferroportin
levels, markers of systemic iron storage and regulation. Nutraceutical product 1 was found
to be the most effective, based on percentage. Overall, combining heme and non-heme
iron improved intestinal absorption and supported iron metabolism, with Nutraceutical
Product 1 proving the most promising in terms of efficacy and safety. These results support
the development of optimised dual-source iron supplements to improve bioavailability
and maintain intestinal barrier integrity, prerequisites for better efficacy and tolerability in
clinical use
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Long-Term Efficacy Of Antihypertensive Therapy In Old-Age PatientsWith Essential Hypertension:Different Approaches For Interval-Censored Data
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
