1,721,264 research outputs found
Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood Neurofilament Light Chain Protein in Prion Disease and Other Rapidly Progressive Dementias: Current State of the Art
Rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) is an umbrella term referring to several conditions causing a rapid neurological deterioration associated with cognitive decline and short disease duration. They comprise Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), the archetypal RPD, rapidly progressive variants of the most common neurodegenerative dementias (NDs), and potentially treatable conditions such as infectious or autoimmune encephalitis and cerebrovascular disease. Given the significant clinical and, sometimes, neuroradiological overlap between these different disorders, biofluid markers also contribute significantly to the differential diagnosis. Among them, the neurofilament light chain protein (NfL) has attracted growing attention in recent years as a biofluid marker of neurodegeneration due to its sensitivity to axonal damage and the reliability of its measurement in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood. Here, we summarize current knowledge regarding biological and clinical implications of NfL evaluation in biofluids across RPDs, emphasizing CJD, and other prion diseases. In the latter, NfL demonstrated a good diagnostic and prognostic accuracy and a potential value as a marker of proximity to clinical onset in pre-symptomatic PRNP mutation carriers. Similarly, in Alzheimer’s disease and other NDs, higher NfL concentrations seem to predict a faster disease progression. While increasing evidence indicates a potential clinical value of NfL in monitoring cerebrovascular disease, the association between NfL and prediction of outcome and/or disease activity in autoimmune encephalitis and infectious diseases has only been investigated in few cohorts and deserves confirmatory studies. In the era of precision medicine and evolving therapeutic options, CSF and blood NfL might aid the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of RPDs and the stratification and management of patients according to disease progression in clinical trials
Understanding prion strains: Evidence from studies of the disease forms affecting humans
Prion diseases are a unique group of rare neurodegenerative disorders characterized by tissue deposition of heterogeneous aggregates of abnormally folded protease-resistant prion protein (PrPSc), a broad spectrum of disease phenotypes and a variable efficiency of disease propagation in vivo. The dominant clinicopathological phenotypes of human prion disease include Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, fatal insomnia, variably protease-sensitive prionopathy, and Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker disease. Prion disease propagation into susceptible hosts led to the isolation and characterization of prion strains, initially operatively defined as “isolates” causing diseases with distinctive characteristics, such as the incubation period, the pattern of PrPSc distribution, and the regional severity of neuropathological changes after injection into syngeneic hosts. More recently, the structural basis of prion strains has been linked to amyloid polymorphs (i.e., variant amyloid protein conformations) and the concept extended to all protein amyloids showing polymorphic structures and some evidence of in vivo or in vitro propagation by seeding. Despite the significant advances, however, the link between amyloid structure and disease is not understood in many instances. Here we reviewed the most significant contributions of human prion disease studies to current knowledge of the molecular basis of phenotypic variability and the prion strain phenomenon and underlined the unsolved issues from the human disease perspective
The Use of Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion for the Diagnosis of Human Prion Diseases
Prion diseases are rapidly progressive, invariably fatal, transmissible neurodegenerative disorders associated with the accumulation of the amyloidogenic form of the prion protein in the central nervous system (CNS). In humans, prion diseases are highly heterogeneous both clinically and neuropathologically. Prion diseases are challenging to diagnose as many other neurologic disorders share the same symptoms, especially at clinical onset. Definitive diagnosis requires brain autopsy to identify the accumulation of the pathological prion protein, which is the only specific disease biomarker. Although brain post-mortem investigation remains the gold standard for diagnosis, antemortem clinical, instrumental, and laboratory tests showing variable sensitivities and specificity, being surrogate disease biomarkers, have been progressively introduced in clinical practice to reach a diagnosis. More recently, the ultrasensitive Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion (RT-QuIC) assay, exploiting, for the first time, the detection of misfolded prion protein through an amplification strategy, has highly improved the “in-vitam” diagnostic process, reaching in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and olfactory mucosa (OM) around 96% sensitivity and close to 100% specificity. RT-QuIC also improved the detection of the pathologic prion protein in several peripheral tissues, possibly even before the clinical onset of the disease. The latter aspect is of great interest for the early and even preclinical diagnosis in subjects at genetic risk of developing the disease, who will likely be the main target population in future clinical trials. This review presents an overview of the current knowledge and future perspectives on using RT-QuIC to diagnose human prion diseases
First case of an UBQLN2 gene mutation causing frontotemporal dementia preceded by adult onset psychiatric symptoms
Recently, mutations in genes related to frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis have been described as the cause of late onset psychosis. Here, we report a 68-year-old patient, carrier of a mutation in the gene encoding ubiquilin-2 (UBQLN2), who presented adult onset psychotic manifestations followed by a dysexecutive syndrome compatible with the diagnosis of behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Therefore, we suggest that variants in UBQLN2 should be sought in patients with this clinical condition preceded by psychiatric disorders
In vivo detection of Alzheimer's and Lewy body disease concurrence: Clinical implications and future perspectives
INTRODUCTION: The recent introduction of seed amplification assays (SAAs) detecting misfolded α-synuclein, a pathology-specific marker for Lewy body disease (LBD), has allowed the in vivo identification and phenotypic characterization of patients with co-occurring Alzheimer's disease (AD) and LBD since the early clinical or even preclinical stage. METHODS: We reviewed studies with an in vivo biomarker-based diagnosis of AD-LBD copathology. RESULTS: Studies in large cohorts of cognitively impaired individuals have shown that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers detect the coexistence of AD and LB pathology in approximately 20%–25% of them, independently of the primary clinical diagnosis. Compared to those with pure AD, AD-LBD patients showed worse global cognition, especially in attentive/executive and visuospatial functions, and worse motor functions. In cognitively unimpaired individuals, concurrent AD-LBD pathologies predicted longitudinal cognitive progression with faster worsening of global cognition, memory, and attentive/executive functions. DISCUSSION: Future research studies aiming for a better precision medicine approach should develop SAAs further to reach a quantitative evaluation or staging of each underlying pathology using a single biofluid sample. Highlights: α-Synuclein seed amplification assays (SAAs) provide a specific marker for Lewy body disease (LBD). SAAs allow for the in vivo identification of co-occurring LBD in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD-LBD coexist in 20-25% of cognitively impaired elderly individuals, and ∼8% of those asymptomatic. Compared to pure AD, AD-LBD causes a faster worsening of cognitive functions. AD-LBD is associated with worse attentive/executive, memory, visuospatial and motor functions
Recent advances in the histo-molecular pathology of human prion disease
Prion diseases are progressive neurodegenerative disorders affecting humans and other mammalian species. The term prion, originally put forward to propose the concept that a protein could be infectious, refers to PrP Sc , a misfolded isoform of the cellular prion protein (PrP C ) that represents the pathogenetic hallmark of these disorders. The discovery that other proteins characterized by misfolding and seeded aggregation can spread from cell to cell, similarly to PrP Sc , has increased interest in prion diseases. Among neurodegenerative disorders, however, prion diseases distinguish themselves for the broader phenotypic spectrum, the fastest disease progression and the existence of infectious forms that can be transmitted through the exposure to diseased tissues via ingestion, injection or transplantation. The main clinicopathological phenotypes of human prion disease include Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, by far the most common, fatal insomnia, variably protease-sensitive prionopathy, and Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker disease. However, clinicopathological manifestations extend even beyond those predicted by this classification. Because of their transmissibility, the phenotypic diversity of prion diseases can also be propagated into syngenic hosts as prion strains with distinct characteristics, such as incubation period, pattern of PrP Sc distribution and regional severity of histopathological changes in the brain. Increasing evidence indicates that different PrP Sc conformers, forming distinct ordered aggregates, encipher the phenotypic variants related to prion strains. In this review, we summarize the most recent advances concerning the histo-molecular pathology of human prion disease focusing on the phenotypic spectrum of the disease including co-pathologies, the characterization of prion strains by experimental transmission and their correlation with the physicochemical properties of PrP Sc aggregates
Towards an improved early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: The emerging role of in vitro conversion assays for protein amyloids
Tissue accumulation of abnormal aggregates of amyloidogenic proteins such as prion protein, α-synuclein, and tau represents the hallmark of most common neurodegenerative disorders and precedes the onset of symptoms by years. As a consequence, the sensitive and specific detection of abnormal forms of these proteins in patients' accessible tissues or fluids as biomarkers may have a significant impact on the clinical diagnosis of these disorders. By exploiting seeded polymerization propagation mechanisms to obtain cell-free reactions that allow highly amplified detection of these amyloid proteins, novel emerging in vitro techniques, such as the real-time quaking-induced conversion assay (RT-QuIC) have paved the way towards this important goal. Given its high accuracy in identifying misfolded forms of prion protein from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) CSF, RT-QuIC has already been included in the diagnostic criteria for the clinical diagnosis of sporadic CJD, the most common human prion disease. By showing that this assay may also accurately discriminate between Lewy body disorders and other forms of parkinsonisms or dementias, more recent studies strongly suggested that CSF RT-QuIC can also be successfully applied to synucleinopathies. Finally, preliminary encouraging data also suggested that CSF RT-QuIC might also work for tau protein, and accurately distinguish between 3R- and 4R tauopathies, including Pick's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration. Here we will review the state of the art of cell-free aggregation assays, their current diagnostic value and putative limitations, and the future perspectives for their expanded use in clinical practice
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
