1,721,007 research outputs found

    Hysteroscopic Polypectomy in the Office without Anesthesia

    No full text
    Hysteroscopy is a reliable procedure not only for diagnosis, but also for office treatment of uterine pathologies that, until recently, required general or at least topical anesthesia. The vaginoscopic approach without a speculum and tenaculum avoids discomfort to patients and ensures complete compliance. We treated 253 endometrial and cervical polyps with 5F instruments and an office hysteroscope with operative sheath. All polyps were removed on diagnosis, and the women were able to resume their normal activity soon after the procedure. Pretreatment with danazol or gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs was necessary only for polyps larger than 2 cm. Recurrence at follow-up was 5%

    Anatomic Impediments to the Performance of Hysteroscopy

    No full text
    Infertility and menorrhagia in menopausal women are the most frequent indications for hysteroscopy. Often, however, the procedure turns out to be difficult or impossible due to stenosis and reduction in the size of the cervical canal. With the availability of more and more atraumatic endoscopic instrumentations and improvements in the technique, hysteroscopy can be performed in all women, whatever the obstacle. In our 5-year experience of 1500 hysteroscopies, we often found anatomic conditions that, besides being obstacles to performing the examination, increased patient discomfort. With the office hysteroscope with a 5F operative sheath one can rapidly overcome the obstacles and complete the examination without discomfort to the patient

    The role of contact hysteroscopy

    No full text
    Contact hysteroscopy has been replaced by a new technique based on the use of a special hysteroscope. The instrument was designed to study the squamocolumnar junction and the lesions of the portion. A new technique, endometrial dating, uses the Hamou hysteroscope to study endometrial physiology. We improved endometrial dating and discovered a new pattern, the pseudofunctional dysvascular endometrium (PFDE), that seemed to pertain to uterine bleeding. We also studied the PFDE syndrome in the presence of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. In this study we reviewed the three procedures and assessed their results. We conclude that contact microhysteroscopy is a reliable diagnostic procedure, and should be considered part of diagnostic hysteroscopy, not an independent technique

    The role of contact hysteroscopy.

    No full text
    Contact hysteroscopy has been replaced by a new technique based on the use of a special hysteroscope. The instrument was designed to study the squamocolumnar junction and the lesions of the portio. A new technique, endometrial dating, uses the Hamou hysteroscope to study endometrial physiology. We improved endometrial dating and discovered a new pattern, the pseudofunctional dysvascular endometrium (PFDE), that seemed to pertain to uterine bleeding. We also studied the PFDE syndrome in the presence of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. In this study we reviewed the three procedures and assessed their results. We conclude that contact microhysteroscopy is a reliable diagnostic procedure, and should be considered part of diagnostic hysteroscopy, not an independent technique

    Hysteroscopic Polypectomy in the Office without Anesthesia

    No full text
    Hysteroscopy is a reliable procedure not only for diagnosis, but also for office treatment of uterine pathologies that, until recently, required general or at least topical anesthesia. The vaginoscopic approach without a speculum and tenaculum avoids discomfort to patients and ensures complete compliance. We treated 253 endometrial and cervical polyps with 5F instruments and an office hysteroscope with operative sheath. All polyps were removed on diagnosis, and the women were able to resume their normal activity soon after the procedure. Pretreatment with danazol or gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs was necessary only for polyps larger than 2 cm. Recurrence at follow-up was 5%

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore