1,721,085 research outputs found
Is there a limit to transanal endoscopic surgery? A comparative study between standard and technically challenging indications among 168 consecutive patients
AIM:
To assess the surgical outcome of transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) for rectal neoplasms in technically challenging indications.
METHOD:
All patients who underwent TES for a rectal neoplasm from 2007 to 2014 were included. Technically challenging indications included a tumour with (i) diameter ≥ 5 cm, (ii) involving ≥ 50% of the rectal circumference and (iii) located ≥ 10 cm from the anal verge. Patients were divided into three groups according to how many of these features they had, as follows: Group 1, none; Group 2, one; Group 3, two or more.
RESULTS:
Of the 168 patients (80 benign and 88 malignant tumours) included in the study, 73 (44%) were in Group 1, 46 (27%) in Group 2 and 49 (29%) in Group 3. There was no difference between Group 1 and Group 2 with regard to peritoneal perforation (P = 0.210), severe postoperative morbidity (P = 0.804), length of hospital stay (P = 0.444), incomplete resection (P = 0.441), piecemeal resection (P = 0.740), locoregional recurrence (P = 0.307) and long-term symptomatic rectal stenosis (P = 0.076). Conversely Group 3 showed significantly impaired results compared with Group 1 with regard to peritoneal perforation (P = 0.003), piecemeal resection (P = 0.005), incomplete resection (P = 0.025), locoregional recurrence (P = 0.035) and long-term symptomatic rectal stenosis (P < 0.001), but no difference in severe postoperative morbidity (P = 0.328).
CONCLUSION:
Transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal neoplasms appears to be safe and effective, even in patients presenting with a technically challenging tumours. Although the short- and long-term outcomes after TES are worse in patients with highly challenging tumours, nevertheless the technique should still be considered in patients at high risk of requiring a proctectomy
P720 Recurrent rectovaginal fistula in patients with Crohn’s disease: How can we improve the success rate of graciloplasty? A bi-centric European study in 30 patients
Peritoneal perforation is less a complication than an expected event during transanal endoscopic microsurgery. experience from 194 consecutive cases
Background: Indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) have been extended to technically challenging tumors, which may be associated with an increased risk of peritoneal perforation (PP). The aim of the present study was to investigate the occurrence, management and outcome of PP in patients having TEM. Methods: All the patients who had TEM for rectal adenoma or adenocarcinoma in our unit were included. Patients in whom PP occurred (Group A) were compared to those without PP (Group B). Results: From 2007 to 2015, 194 TEM (116 men, median age 66 [range 21–100] years) were divided into Groups A (n = 28, 14%) and B (n = 166). The latter group included four patients, in whom a laparoscopy did not confirm suspicion of PP made during TEM. In 2 of 28 patients (7%), the diagnosis of PP was made postoperatively during reoperation for peritonitis. For the 26 other patients (93%), routine exploratory laparoscopy was performed with suture of the peritoneal defect on the pouch of Douglas in 24 cases and a rectal suture alone in 2 cases. Independent predictive factors for PP were: distance from the anal verge >10 cm (OR = 3.6), circumferential tumor (OR = 3.0) and anterior location (OR = 2.7). Hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A (7.5 [3–31] days) than in Group B (4 [1–38] days; p < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference regarding postoperative morbidity and recurrence rate. Conclusions: Our results suggested that PP is not a very rare event during TEM, especially in anterior, circumferential and/or high rectal tumors. Laparoscopic treatment of PP is feasible and safe. The occurrence of PP is not associated with poor oncologic results
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Mucosal changes in ileal pouches after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative and Crohn's colitis.
PURPOSE: Inflammation and dysplasia may affect the ileal pouch after restorative
proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The aim of this prospective
study was to evaluate the morphologic changes and the risk of dysplasia within
the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis underwent
endoscopies and biopsies of the pouch: 21 patients were affected by ulcerative
colitis and 16 by Crohn's colitis. The mucosal biopsy specimens were studied to
investigate the degree of acute and chronic inflammation and the occurrence of
dysplasia. A score system was calculated for each patient and correlated with the
histologic diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's colitis.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 85 (range, 7-198) months, the inflammation
histologic score evaluated was 3.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.4-5.1) and
3.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.6-4.3), respectively, in patients with
Crohn's colitis and ulcerative colitis (mean and 95 percent confidence interval;
P = 0.74, not significant), and no patient developed mucosal dysplasia. Fifteen
patients (40.5 percent) developed clinical pouchitis that occurred in Crohn's
colitis (9/16 patients or 56 percent) and in ulcerative colitis (6/21 patients or
28 percent; P not significant). The score was 4.1 (95 percent confidence
interval, 3.2-5) in patients with pouchitis and 3.2 (95 percent confidence
interval, 2.1-4.3) in patients without clinical pouchitis (P = 0.012) and was 4.1
(95 percent confidence interval, 2.6-5.5) and 4 (95 percent confidence interval,
2.9-5.3), respectively, in pouchitis patients with Crohn's colitis and ulcerative
colitis.
CONCLUSION: No difference in the inflammation histologic score was observed in
ileal pouches after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative and Crohn's
colitis. In our series, which includes those patients with longer follow-up (>5
years) or with chronic unremitting pouchitis, no case of dysplasia was found. The
occurrence of pouchitis was higher in the case of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
for Crohn's disease than for ulcerative colitis, but no difference in the
severity of the histologic score was noted
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
