1,720,955 research outputs found
Uncertainty-Aware Meta-Learning for Learning from Limited Data
Deep Learning (DL) models have achieved great success in large data fields ranging from computer vision and natural language processing to digital arts and robotics. However, the effectiveness of the DL models is challenged by many real-world limited data problems (e.g., medicine, healthcare, and security intelligence) where data for model training is scarce. Unlike DL models, humans can use the prior knowledge stored in their brains to quickly learn new tasks with limited data. Inspired by such human learning, various meta-learning models have been developed that aim to address the challenge of learning from limited data. However, existing models are computationally expensive, lack fine-grained uncertainty-quantification capabilities, and the predictions are not always trustworthy. The dissertation focuses on different instances of the two most popular limited data problems: few-shot regression and few-shot classification. For both problems, the developed models need to be robust, and output well-calibrated trustworthy predictions while remaining computationally cheap and label-efficient to ensure real-world applicability. In this dissertation, we develop a novel uncertainty-aware meta-learning framework based on evidential deep learning that contributes towards developing a reliable model that can address the above challenges. We first introduce the evidential multidimensional belief theory for meta-learning that leads to computationally-efficient uncertainty-aware few-shot classification models. We then extend the evidential regression theory to meta-learning models that leads to computationally-efficient uncertainty-aware outlier-robust few-shot regression models. We then carry out a thorough analysis of the evidential deep learning framework to identify fundamental learning deficiency that helps explain the suboptimal performance, especially in challenging settings. We then develop theoretically justified, empirically validated solution to address the fundamental learning deficiency of the evidential models. Improving on the developed theory, we introduce the Bayesian-evidential framework for parameter-efficient-fine-tuning of vision foundation models that leads to well-calibrated uncertainty-aware few-shot learning models. We then study the adversarial robustness of the developed uncertainty-aware models. We also explore applications of the ideas developed in this dissertation to real-world problems of healthcare and high-density-energy physics. The theoretically grounded, empirically justified solutions of the uncertainty-aware meta-learning framework developed in this dissertation contribute towards development of trustworthy uncertainty-aware models that are capable of effectively learning from limited data
Evidential Conditional Neural Processes
The Conditional Neural Process (CNP) family of models offer a promising direction to tackle few-shot problems by achieving better scalability and competitive predictive performance. However, the current CNP models only capture the overall uncertainty for the prediction made on a target data point. They lack a systematic fine-grained quantification on the distinct sources of uncertainty that are essential for model training and decision-making under the few-shot setting. We propose Evidential Conditional Neural Processes (ECNP), which replace the standard Gaussian distribution used by CNP with a much richer hierarchical Bayesian structure through evidential learning to achieve epistemic-aleatoric uncertainty decomposition. The evidential hierarchical structure also leads to a theoretically justified robustness over noisy training tasks. Theoretical analysis on the proposed ECNP establishes the relationship with CNP while offering deeper insights on the roles of the evidential parameters. Extensive experiments conducted on both synthetic and real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed model in various few-shot settings
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
