1,720,955 research outputs found
FIGURE 2 in Heteroconium tulsiense (Antennulariellaceae): a novel microfungus from Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra, India
No full textFIGURE 2. SEM Images of Heteroconium tulsiense sp. nov. A. Aggregated conidiophores attached to the host substratum; B. Septation in conidiophores, C, D. Conidial chain having 4 conidia; E. Conidia with narrow apical end and broad truncate base, F. Ends of conidia. Scale bars: A, C, D = 20 µm, B, F = 2 µm, E = 10 µm.Published as part of Dubey, Rashmi & Pandey, Amit D., 2022, Heteroconium tulsiense (Antennulariellaceae): a novel microfungus from Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra, India, pp. 190-196 in Phytotaxa 536 (2) on page 193, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.536.2.8, http://zenodo.org/record/625768
Heteroconium tulsiense Rashmi Dubey 2022, sp. nov.
No full text<i>Heteroconium tulsiense</i> Rashmi Dubey <i>sp. nov.</i> (Figs 1, 2) <p> <i>Mycobank</i> MB-839843</p> <p> <b>Etymology</b>:—Named after place of collection, Tulsi Range of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra, India.</p> <p> <b>Holotype</b>:— INDIA. Maharashtra: Mumbai, Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Tulsi Range, Tiger Reserve areas, on dry twig litter, 22 January 2017, Rashmi Dubey, BSI (WC) 209274, deposited in herbarium of Botanical Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.</p> <p> <b>Description:—</b> Colonies on natural substrate, effuse, hairy. Mycelium superficial and immersed, composed of septate, smooth-walled, dark brown or brown hyphae, 1–2 μm diam. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, simple, erect, mostly unbranched but aggregated near the base, straight or slightly flexuous, cylindrical, smooth, thickwalled, 3–9-septate, brown to dark brown, 33–62 × 7–9 μm. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, terminal, cylindrical, integrated, determinate or percurrent, brown, smooth, truncate at the apex, 5–9 × 5.75–7.0 μm. Conidial secession schizolytic. Conidia holoblastic, acrogenous, blastocatenate in chains of up to four, smooth, obclavate, brown, unevenly pigmented, pale brown ends, rounded at apex, truncate at base, thick-walled, 31–45 × 7.5–8.7 μm, 4–7-septate, slightly constricted at the septa.</p> <p> <b>Known distribution:—</b> Only known from type locality in the Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra, India.</p>Published as part of <i>Dubey, Rashmi & Pandey, Amit D., 2022, Heteroconium tulsiense (Antennulariellaceae): a novel microfungus from Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra, India, pp. 190-196 in Phytotaxa 536 (2)</i> on page 192, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.536.2.8, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6257685">http://zenodo.org/record/6257685</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Heteroconium Petr.
No full textKey to accepted <i>Heteroconium</i> species <p> 1. Conidia dimorphic, one type of conidia is unicellular and concolorous and second type of conidia is bicellular and bicolorous..................................................................................................................................................................................................... <i>H. simile</i></p> <p>1. Conidia monomorphic, either concolorous or bicolorous..................................................................................................................2</p> <p>2. Conidia concolorous...........................................................................................................................................................................3</p> <p>2. Conidia bicolorous..............................................................................................................................................................................4</p> <p>3. Conidia hyaline to pale brown............................................................................................................................................................5</p> <p>3. Conidia brown to dark brown.............................................................................................................................................................6</p> <p> 4. Conidia guttulated................................................................................................................................................................. <i>H. avilae</i></p> <p>4. Conidia not guttulated......................................................................................................................................................................17</p> <p> 5. Scar at both ends of conidia............................................................................................................................................. <i>H. triticicola</i></p> <p>5. No scars at the end of conidia.............................................................................................................................................................7</p> <p>6. Conidia both euseptate and distoseptate………………………………………………..…...............................................................8</p> <p>6. Conidia euseptate………………………………………………………………………....................................................................9</p> <p> 7. Occasionally with a secondary conidium, smooth-walled, 0–6-euseptate, 13–44 × 5.5–10 μm....................................... <i>H. schimae</i></p> <p> 7. No secondary conidium observed, conidia 3–6-septate, 26–52 × 4–6 μm....................................................................... <i>H. tropicale</i></p> <p> 8. Conidia aseptate to multi-septate, subclindrical to ellipsoid, verruculose, 10–60 × 7–8 μm....................................... <i>H. kleinziense</i></p> <p> 8. Conidia 14–22-septate (6–8-euseptate, 8–14-distoseptate), straight or slightly curved, obclavate, 58–93.5 μm × 5–8 μm....................................................................................................................................................................................................... <i>H. bannaense</i></p> <p>9. Conidia single septate.......................................................................................................................................................................10</p> <p>9. Conidia with more than one septa....................................................................................................................................................11</p> <p> 10. Conidia fusiform to cylindrical, pale brown to reddish brown, 23–42.5 × 8.5–10.5 μm.................................................. <i>H. indicum</i></p> <p> 10. Conidia obclavate to ellipsoid, brown, smooth, 12–24 × 4–6 μm................................................................................. <i>H. ponapense</i></p> <p>11. Conidia less than 7-septate...............................................................................................................................................................12</p> <p>11. Conidia more than 7-septate.............................................................................................................................................................15</p> <p> 12. Conidia at first smooth and hyaline, later verrucose.................................................................................................... <i>H. glutinosum</i></p> <p>12. Conidia smooth-walled.....................................................................................................................................................................13</p> <p> 13. Conidia in chains of 2, 6–7-septate............................................................................................................................ <i>H. phellodendri</i></p> <p>13. Conidia in chains of 3, less than 4-septate.......................................................................................................................................14</p> <p> 14. Conidia (1–)2-septate, 20–25 9 7–10 μm......................................................................................................... <i>H. tsoongiodendronis</i></p> <p> 14. Conidia 1–4-septate, 13.5–32.5 × 5.4–8.5 μm................................................................................................................. <i>H. lignicola</i></p> <p> 15. Conidia verrucose with longitudinal striations or with creases, 1–14-septate.............................................................. <i>H. neriifoliae</i></p> <p> 15. Conidia smooth-walled, 1–10-septate <i>..............................................................................................................................................</i> 16</p> <p> 16. Conidia not constricted at septa, cylindrical to fusiform, 35–95 × 8–12 μm............................................................... <i>H. arundicum</i></p> <p> 16. Conidia slightly constricted at septa, cylindrical to oblong, 10–40 × 3–7 μm.............................................................. <i>H. citharexyli</i></p> <p> 17. Conidia with a double layered wall................................................................................................................................. <i>H. asiaticum</i></p> <p>17. Conidia with a thick single layered wall..........................................................................................................................................18</p> <p> 18. Conidia with apical cells pale brown.............................................................................................................................. <i>H. annesleae</i></p> <p>18. Apical and basal end of conidia pale brown.....................................................................................................................................19</p> <p>19. With black band at each septum.......................................................................................................................................................20</p> <p>19. Without black band at each septum..................................................................................................................................................21</p> <p> 20. Conidia cylindrical or fusiform, 9–16-euseptate, brown, pale brown ends, 50–85 × 4–6 μm, in chains of 3............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. <i>H. neolitseae</i></p> <p> 20. Conidia, obclavate, thick-walled, 45–110 × 8–12 μm, 8–18-septate, in chains of 2................................................................. <i>H. fici</i></p> <p> 21. Conidia blastocatenate, in chains up to 3, smooth, rarely verrucose, primary conidia 5–7-sepatate, truncate at both ends, 32–40(– 50) × 8–10 μm, secondary conidia 3–4 septate, rounded above and truncate below, 20–30 × 3–5 μm........................ <i>H. decorosum</i></p> <p> 21. Conidia blastocatenate, in chains up to 4, smooth, obclavate, 4–7-septate, (mostly 6-septate), slightly constricted at septa, rounded at apex, truncate at base, 31–45 × 7.5–8.7 μm, 4–7-septate............................................................ <i> <i>Heteroconium tulsiense</i> sp. nov.</i> </p>Published as part of <i>Dubey, Rashmi & Pandey, Amit D., 2022, Heteroconium tulsiense (Antennulariellaceae): a novel microfungus from Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra, India, pp. 190-196 in Phytotaxa 536 (2)</i> on page 194, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.536.2.8, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6257685">http://zenodo.org/record/6257685</a>
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
