1,720,980 research outputs found
Comment on: Recovery from COVID-19 in a patient with spondyloarthritis treated with TNF-alpha inhibitor etanercept. A report on a patient with COVID-19 with psoriatic arthritis receiving ustekinumab
No full textSTRIAA (Severity TRichoscopy Index Alopecia Areata): Validation of a Novel Trichoscopic Tool for Evaluation of Alopecia Areata
Full text linkIntroduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is a non-scarring autoimmune disease characterized by patchy hair loss. The aim of this study was to validate a novel trichoscopic scoring tool, the Severity TRichoscopy Index for Alopecia Areata (STRIAA), for rapid assessment of AA severity. Methods: Anonymized images from 340 patients were scored by two independent raters who analyzed four scalp areas (vertex, occipital, and left and right parietal) for trichoscopic signs: black dots, yellow dots, exclamation mark hairs, broken hairs, and short vellus hairs. Scores (0–3) were assigned according to the number of trichoscopic signs per area, resulting in a total STRIAA score out of 60. Results: STRIAA showed high interrater reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.99) and significant correlation with the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score (p < 0.001). Yellow and black dots were significantly associated with the SALT score. Conclusions: The STRIAA provides a rapid and comprehensive assessment of AA severity, complementing current assessment tools in clinical practice
Secukinumab Drug Survival in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: A 24-Month Real-Life Study
No full textSecukinumab effectiveness has been demonstrated in both psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, it is unknown whether patients with arthritis may carry a risk factor for withdrawal
Omalizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Association Between Body Mass Index and Outcome
Full text linkINTRODUCTION: Omalizumab has been recently registered as a third-line therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to provide real life data by reporting our experience with omalizumab in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was conducted on 40 patients affected by chronic spontaneous urticaria and treated with omalizumab at the Dermatology Unit of Padua. Demographic, anthropometric, and clinical data have been collected. RESULTS: Overall, the majority of patients (23 patients, 57.5%) achieved complete recovery by taking omalizumab and 17.5% (7 patients) had a partial response. The majority of patients who did not have a response to omalizumab had a body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that omalizumab is a safe and effective treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria. We identified BMI as a critical biological factor that significantly impacts the outcomes of omalizumab treatment. Our findings also suggest a potential use of BMI as a predictive biomarker for omalizumab treatment. An up-dosing of omalizumab may be proposed in patients with high BMI to achieve a better control of the disease
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
