1,721,174 research outputs found
Prescribing the right therapy for the treatment of chronic cough: a critical focus on current and investigational options
No full textDoxofylline is not just another theophylline!
Full text linkDoxofylline, which differs from theophylline in containing the dioxalane group at position 7, has comparable efficacy to theophylline in the treatment of respiratory diseases, but with an improved tolerability profile and a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. Furthermore, it does not have significant drug-drug interactions as exhibited with theophylline, which make using theophylline more challenging, especially in elderly patients with co-morbidities receiving multiple classes of drug. It is now clear that doxofylline also possesses a distinct pharmacological profile from theophylline (no significant effect on any of the known phosphodiesterase isoforms, no significant adenosine receptor antagonism, no direct effect on histone deacetylases, interaction with -adrenoceptors) and therefore, should not be considered as just a modified theophylline. Randomized clinical trials of doxofylline to investigate the use of this drug to reduce exacerbations and hospitalizations due to asthma or COPD as an alternative to expensive biologics, and certainly as an alternative to theophylline are to be encouraged
Pharmacological Modulation of the Inflammatory Actions of Platelets
No full textPatients with inflammatory diseases often exhibit a change in platelet function, with these alterations being clearly distinct from the well-characterized role of platelets in haemostasis and thrombosis. It has recently been revealed that platelets can behave as innate inflammatory cells in immune responses with roles in leukocyte recruitment, migration into tissues, release of cytotoxic mediators, and in tissue remodelling following injury.Platelets exhibit a wide range of receptors for mediators involved in the inflammatory pathway and the immune response (Fig. 1). These include purinergic receptors, selectins, integrins, toll-like receptors, immunoglobulins, and chemokine receptors, but the precise role platelets play in the inflammatory process is still under investigation. Nevertheless, given that many of these receptors are distinct from those involved in thrombosis and haemostasis, this raises the real possibility of targeting these receptors to regulate inflammatory diseases without compromising haemostasis
The discovery and development of gefapixant as a novel antitussive therapy
No full textIntroductionGefapixant, a P2X 3 receptor antagonist, shows considerable potential in managing refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Clinical trials have consistently demonstrated its efficacy in significantly reducing cough frequency and alleviating associated symptoms. However, its adverse effect profile, particularly taste disturbances such as dysgeusia and hypogeusia, the incidence of which is dose-dependent, poses a significant challenge to patient compliance and overall treatment satisfaction.Areas coveredThe authors review the mechanism of action of gefapixant, the dose-dependent nature of its adverse effects and the findings from various clinical trials, including Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 studies. The authors also cover its regulatory status, post-marketing data, and its main competitors.Expert opinionGefapixant represents a significant advancement in treating chronic cough. However, balancing efficacy and tolerability is crucial. Lower effective doses and potential combination therapies may mitigate taste disturbances. Patient education and close monitoring during treatment are also important for optimal outcomes. Further research is needed to refine dosing strategies to minimize side effects while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This research and personalized treatment approaches are key to optimizing gefapixant therapy, ensuring improved management of chronic cough while reducing adverse effects. However, pharmaceutical trials and proposals must be adapted to align with each regulatory body's specific requirements and concerns
Novel Anti-Inflammatory Approaches to COPD
No full textAirway inflammation, driven by different types of inflammatory cells and mediators, plays a fundamental role in COPD and its progression. Neutrophils, eosinophils, macrophages, and CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes are key players in this process, although the extent of their participation varies according to the patient's endotype. Anti-inflammatory medications may modify the natural history and progression of COPD. However, since airway inflammation in COPD is relatively resistant to corticosteroid therapy, innovative pharmacological anti-inflammatory approaches are required. The heterogeneity of inflammatory cells and mediators in annethe different COPD endo-phenotypes requires the development of specific pharmacologic agents. Indeed, over the past two decades, several mechanisms that influence the influx and/or activity of inflammatory cells in the airways and lung parenchyma have been identified. Several of these molecules have been tested in vitro models and in vivo in laboratory animals, but only a few have been studied in humans. Although early studies have not been encouraging, useful information emerged suggesting that some of these agents may need to be further tested in specific subgroups of patients, hopefully leading to a more personalized approach to treating COPD
Use of thiols and implications for the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the presence of oxidative stress in COPD
No full textBackgroundOxidative stress and persistent airway inflammation are thought to be important contributors to the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This review summarizes the evidence for targeting oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with COPD with mucolytic/antioxidant thiols and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either alone or in combination.Main bodyOxidative stress is increased in COPD, particularly during acute exacerbations. It can be triggered by oxidant air pollutants and cigarette smoke and/or by endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) released from mitochondria and activated inflammatory, immune and epithelial cells in the airways, together with a reduction in endogenous antioxidants such as glutathione (GSH). Oxidative stress also drives chronic inflammation and disease progression in the airways by activating intracellular signalling pathways and the release of further inflammatory mediators. ICS are anti-inflammatory agents currently recommended for use with long-acting bronchodilators to prevent exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, especially those with eosinophilic airway inflammation. However, corticosteroids can also increase oxidative stress, which may in turn reduce corticosteroid sensitivity in patients by several mechanisms. Thiol-based agents such as erdosteine, N-acetyl L-cysteine (NAC) and S-carboxymethylcysteine (S-CMC) are mucolytic agents that also act as antioxidants. These agents may reduce oxidative stress directly through the free sulfhydryl groups, serving as a source of reducing equivalents and indirectly though intracellular GSH replenishment. Few studies have compared the effects of corticosteroids and thiol agents on oxidative stress, but there is some evidence for greater antioxidant effects when they are administered together. The current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report supports treatment with antioxidants (erdosteine, NAC, S-CMC) in addition to standard-of-care therapy as they have been demonstrated to reduce COPD exacerbations. However, such studies have demonstrated that NAC and S-CMC reduced the exacerbation risk only in patients not treated with ICS, whereas erdosteine reduced COPD exacerbations irrespective of concomitant ICS use suggesting that erdosteine has additional pharmacological actions to ICS.ConclusionsFurther clinical trials of antioxidant agents with and without ICS are needed to better understand the place of thiol-based drugs in the treatment of patients with COPD
Ozone-induced hypertussive responses in rabbits and Guinea pigs
Full text linkCough remains a major unmet clinical need, and preclinical animal models are not predictive for new antitussive agents. We have investigated the mechanisms and pharmacological sensitivity of ozone-induced hypertussive responses in rabbits and Guinea pigs. Ozone induced a significant increase in cough frequency and a decrease in time to first cough to inhaled citric acid in both conscious Guinea pigs and rabbits. This response was inhibited by the established antitussive drugs codeine and levodropropizine. In contrast to the Guinea pig, hypertussive responses in the rabbit were not inhibited by bronchodilator drugs (β2 agonists or muscarinic receptor antagonists), suggesting that the observed hypertussive state was not secondary to bronchoconstriction in this species. The ozone-induced hypertussive response in the rabbit was inhibited by chronic pretreatment with capsaicin, suggestive of a sensitization of airway sensory nerve fibers. However, we could find no evidence for a role of TRPA1 in this response, suggesting that ozone was not sensitizing airway sensory nerves via activation of this receptor. Whereas the ozone-induced hypertussive response was accompanied by a significant influx of neutrophils into the airway, the hypertussive response was not inhibited by the antiinflammatory phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast at a dose that clearly exhibited anti-inflammatory activity. In summary, our results suggest that ozone-induced hypertussive responses to citric acid may provide a useful model for the investigation of novel drugs for the treatment of cough, but some important differences were noted between the two species with respect to sensitivity to bronchodilator drugs.</p
What Role will Ensifentrine Play in the Future Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients? Implications from Recent Clinical Trials
No full textData from the phase III ENHANCE clinical trials provide compelling evidence that ensifentrine, an inhaled 'bifunctional' dual phosphodiesterase 3/4 inhibitor, can provide additional benefit to existing treatments in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and represents a 'first-in-class' drug having bifunctional bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory activity in a single molecule. Ensifentrine, generally well tolerated, can provide additional bronchodilation when added to muscarinic receptor antagonists or & beta;2-agonists and reduce the exacerbation risk. This information allows us to consider better the possible inclusion of ensifentrine in the future treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, there is less information on whether it provides additional benefit when added to inhaled corticosteroid or 'triple therapy' and, therefore, when this drug is best utilized in clinical practice.Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the name for a group of lung conditions that cause breathing difficulties/airflow limitations. The airflow limitation is not completely reversible and is associated with a state of chronic inflammation of lung tissue. Treatment of the disease is still heavily dependent on the use of medications called bronchodilators and corticosteroids. However, corticosteroids have little-to-no impact on the underlying inflammation in most COPD patients. Therefore, innovative anti-inflammatory approaches are required. In this context, single molecules that are capable of simultaneously inducing bronchodilation, relaxing the muscles in the lungs and widening the airways (bronchi), and anti-inflammatory activity are a highly intriguing possibility for treating COPD. One approach is to develop drugs that can simultaneously inhibit enzymes called phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4. Enzymes are proteins that help speed up metabolism, or the chemical reactions in our bodies. PDE4 inhibitors are intracellular enzymes (work inside the cell) expressed in most inflammatory cells, even in neutrophils (a type of white blood cells), which are involved in the pathogenesis of COPD, where an infection turns into a disease. However, its inhibition does not produce severe bronchodilator effects, which is instead obtained by inhibiting PDE3, the PDE isoenzyme (a different form of the same enzyme) that is predominantly expressed in airway smooth muscle cells. A treatment called ensifentrine is a dual PDE3/4 inhibitor (inhibits both PDE3 and PDE4). Two recent phase III studies (ENHANCE-1 and ENHANCE-2) have shown that it induces significant bronchodilation and reduces the risk of COPD worsening, exerting an anti-inflammatory effect. Data from the ENHANCE studies also showed the benefit of adding ensifentrine to treatment with bronchodilators. Certainly, the drug represents a useful therapeutic option, but further clinical studies are needed to be able to correctly position ensifentrine in the context of regular COPD treatment.Ensifentrine, an inhaled 'bifunctional' dual PDE3/4 inhibitor, can provide additional benefit to existing treatments in patients with COPD and represents a 'first in class' drug having bifunctional bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory activity in a single molecule
Revisiting asthma pharmacotherapy: where do we stand and where do we want to go?
No full textSeveral current guidelines/strategies outline a treatment approach to asthma, which primarily consider the goals of improving lung function and quality of life and reducing symptoms and exacerbations. They suggest a strategy of stepping up or down treatment, depending on the patient's overall current asthma symptom control and future risk of exacerbation. While this stepwise approach is undeniably practical for daily practice, it does not always address the underlying mechanisms of this heterogeneous disease. In the last decade, there have been attempts to improve the treatment of severe asthma, such as the addition of a long-acting antimuscarinic agent to the traditional inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting & beta;2-agonist treatment and the introduction of therapies targeting key cytokines. However, despite such strategies several unmet needs in this population remain, motivating research to identify novel targets and develop improved therapeutic and/or preventative asthma treatments. Pending the availability of such therapies, it is essential to re-evaluate the current conventional "one-size-fits-all" approach to a more precise asthma management. Although challenging, identifying "treatable traits" that contribute to respiratory symptoms in individual patients with asthma may allow a more pragmatic approach to establish more personalised therapeutic goals
- …
