1,720,985 research outputs found

    Les relations entre la Bohême et la Gaule du IVe au Ier s. av. J.-C.

    Get PDF
    This work will introduce the relationships between Bohemia and Gaul from 4th to 1st century BC, mainly based on previous documentation, originating from research history and monographic issues, concerning particular types of artefacts. A range of 61 of them, constituting 230 items, has so been defined, forming as many "contacts features" between both areas. These features allow underlining the dynamic in theses contacts, even on chronological and spatial ground. The function of some sites (Stradonice, Manching) or areas (Switzerland, Rhine-Moselle) is so emphasized. The performing of quality and quantity data is completed by researches concerning the form of contacts that can be considered (exchanges, migration, aso.). The second stage of the analysis process is bringing out some procedure difficulties, proving that archaeological data by themselves are necessary but not sufficient to answer these questions.Ce travail se propose d'étudier les relations entre la Bohême et la Gaule du IVe au Ier s. av. J.-C., principalement à partir d'une reprise de la documentation antérieure, issue de l'histoire de la recherche et de travaux monographiques concernant des types d'objets particuliers. Un corpus de 61 types d'artefacts, représentant 230 individus a ainsi pu être établi, constituant autant de " marqueurs de contacts " entre ces deux régions. Ces marqueurs permettent de mettre en avant une dynamique dans les contacts, à la fois au niveau chronologique et spatial. Le rôle de certains sites (Stradonice, Manching) ou de certaines régions (Suisse, Rhin-Moselle) est ainsi souligné. L'analyse des données qualitatives et quantitatives est complétée par des recherches sur les formes de contacts qui peuvent être envisagées (échanges, migrations, etc.). Cette deuxième phase du processus d'analyse a permis de mettre en avant un certain nombre de difficultés méthodologiques, démontrant ainsi que les données archéologiques seules sont nécessaires mais non suffisantes pour répondre à ces questions

    The relationships between Bohemia and Gaul from 4th to 1st century BC.

    No full text
    Ce travail se propose d'étudier les relations entre la Bohême et la Gaule du IVe au Ier s. av. J.-C., principalement à partir d'une reprise de la documentation antérieure, issue de l'histoire de la recherche et de travaux monographiques concernant des types d'objets particuliers. Un corpus de 61 types d'artefacts, représentant 230 individus a ainsi pu être établi, constituant autant de « marqueurs de contacts » entre ces deux régions. Ces marqueurs permettent de mettre en avant une dynamique dans les contacts, à la fois au niveau chronologique et spatial. Le rôle de certains sites (Stradonice, Manching) ou de certaines régions (Suisse, Rhin-Moselle) est ainsi souligné. L'analyse des données qualitatives et quantitatives est complétée par des recherches sur les formes de contacts qui peuvent être envisagées (échanges, migrations, etc.). Cette deuxième phase du processus d'analyse a permis de mettre en avant un certain nombre de difficultés méthodologiques, démontrant ainsi que les données archéologiques seules sont nécessaires mais non suffisantes pour répondre à ces questions.This work will introduce the relationships between Bohemia and Gaul from 4th to 1st century BC, mainly based on previous documentation, originating from research history and monographic issues, concerning particular types of artefacts. A range of 61 of them, constituting 230 items, has so been defined, forming as many "contacts features" between both areas. These features allow underlining the dynamic in theses contacts, even on chronological and spatial ground. The function of sorne sites (Stradonice, Manching) or are as (Switzerland, Rhine-Moselle) is so emphasized. The performing of quality and quantity data is completed by researches concerning the form of contacts that can be considered (exchanges, migration, aso.). The second stage of the analysis process is bringing out sorne procedure difficulties, proving that archaeological data by themselves are necessary but not sufficient to answer these questions.In der vorliegende arbeit werden die beziehungen zwischen Böhmen und Gallien in der Zeit vom 4. bis 1. Jh. v. Chr. untersucht. Das hauptaugenmerk liegt dabei auf der neubewertung der im zuge der älteren und jüngeren forschung entstandenen archäologischen Dokumentation und der monographisch vorgelegten ergebnisse zu verschiedenen für diese epoche relevanten objekttypen. Als resultat dieser untersuchung wird ein korpus von 61 artefakttypen auf der basis von 230 einzelobjekten vorgelegt, die als "kontaktindikatoren" (marqueurs de contacts) für die beiden betrachteten regionen verstanden werden. Diese indikatoren erlauben die beschreibung dynamischer kontakte, sowohl in chronologischer als auch in räumlicher hinsicht. Die bedeutung bestimmter fundorte (Stradonice, Manching) und fundregionen (Schweiz, Rhein-Mosel) für die beziehungen zwischen den untersuchungsgebieten wird in der arbeit diskutiert. Eine erste stufe der qualitativen und quantitativen analyse der daten wird dabei von überlegungen zur möglichen form der kontakte (handel, migration, etc.) ergänzt. Diese zweite stufe der untersuchung erlaubt es auch bestimmte methodologische schwierigkeiten aufzuzeigen, die einerseits die notwendigkeit der untersuchung der archäologischen Daten unterstreichen, andererseits aber auch darauf hinweisen, dass die betrachtung des archäologischen materials alleine unzureichend ist um die aufgeworfenen fragen zu beantworten.Tato práce si klade za cíl zkoumat vztahy mezi Čechami a Galií mezi 4. a 1. stoletím před Kristem, a to především přezkoumáním dosavadních publikací na toto téma. Vycházeli jsme tak z dějin bádání a z monografií k jednotlivým typům artefaktů. Byl tak vytvořen korpus 230 předmětů náležejících 61 typům, které jsou považovány za „indikátory kontaktů“ mezi oběma oblastmi. Tyto indikátory umožňují sledovat dynamiku kontaktů z hlediska současně chronologického i prostorového. Vyvstává tak nápadně role některých nalezišť (Stradonice, Manching) a oblastí (Švýcarsko, Porýní a Pomoselí). Práce se skládá jednak z rozboru kvantitativních i kvalitativních údajů a jednak ze studie o formách kontaktů, o nich je možno uvažovat (směna, migrace atd.). Tato druhá fáze analýzy poukazuje na některé metodologické slabiny a dokládá, že archeologické prameny jsou k zodpovězení našich otázek sice nezbytné, nikoliv však samy o sobě zcela dostačující

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Vztahy mezi Čechami a Galií ve 4. až 1. stol. př. Kr.

    Get PDF
    Tato práce si klade za cíl zkoumat vztahy mezi !echami a Galií mezi 4. a 1. stoletím p"ed Kristem, a to p"edev#ím p"ezkoumáním dosavadních publikací na toto téma. Vycházeli jsme tak zdd%jin bádání a zmonografií kjednotliv&m typ'm artefakt'. Byl tak vytvo"en korpus 230 p"edm%t' nále(ejících 61 typ'm, které jsou pova(ovány za "indikátory kontakt'" mezi ob%ma oblastmi. Tyto indikátory umo()ují sledovat dynamiku kontakt' zhlediska sou*asn% chronologického i prostorového. Vyvstává tak nápadn% role n%kter&ch nalezi#+ (Stradonice, Manching) a oblastí (,v&carsko, Por&ní a Pomoselí). Práce se skládá jednak z rozboru kvantitativních i kvalitativních údaj' a jednak ze studie o formách kontakt', o nich je mo(no uva(ovat (sm%na, migrace atd.). Tato druhá fáze anal&zy poukazuje na n%které metodologické slabiny a dokládá, (e archeologické prameny jsou k$zodpov%zení na#ich otázek sice nezbytné, nikoliv v#ak samy o sob% zcela dosta*ující.This work will introduce the relationships between Bohemia and Gaul from 4th to 1st century BC, mainly based on previous documentation, originating from research history and monographic issues, concerning particular types of artefacts. A range of 61 of them, constituting 230 items, has so been defined, forming as many "contacts features" between both areas. These features allow underlining the dynamic in theses contacts, even on chronological and spatial ground. The function of some sites (Stradonice, Manching) or areas (Switzerland, Rhine-Moselle) is so emphasized. The performing of quality and quantity data is completed by researches concerning the form of contacts that can be considered (exchanges, migration, aso.). The second stage of the analysis process is bringing out some procedure difficulties, proving that archaeological data by themselves are necessary but not sufficient to answer these questions.Institute of ArchaeologyÚstav pro archeologiiFilozofická fakultaFaculty of Art
    corecore