1,721,092 research outputs found

    The Family Tree model

    No full text
    <p>Code for the following publication: <br>Pellard, Thomas, Robin Ryder & Guillaume Jacques. 2025. The Family Tree model. In Adam Ledgeway, Edith Aldridge, Anne Breitbarth, Katalin É. Kiss, Joseph Salmons & Alexandra Simonenko (eds.), <em>The Wiley Blackwell companion to diachronic linguistics</em>. Wiley Blackwell.</p&gt

    Ōgami (Miyako Ryukyuan)

    No full text
    International audienceGrammatical sketch of the Ōgami dialect of Miyako Ryukyua

    Nichi-ryū sogo (日琉祖語) [Proto-Japonic]

    No full text
    Pellard, Thomas. 2019.「日琉祖語」木部暢子(編) 『明解方言学辞典』113. 東京:三省堂. 日琉祖語 (にちりゅうそご) proto-Japonic, proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan Thomas Pellard 日琉語族を形成する日本本土および琉球列島の諸言語が分岐する以前の共通 祖先の言語。比較方法によって再建される。以前「日本祖語」と呼ばれていた が、琉球諸語を排除した「日本(本土)祖語」と区別するために近年広まりつ つある用語である。 分岐の過程と年代 日琉祖語は文字通り本土日本語派と琉球語派とにまず分かれたと思われる が、琉球諸語が日琉祖語から直接ではなく九州諸方言から二次的に分岐したと いう仮説もある。さらに八丈島の言語は本土の方言と共通する新しい面も示し ながら古い特徴もいくつも保持しており、その史的な位置が定かではない。 一方、琉球諸語と八丈語は「古事記」や「万葉集」など、日本語の最古の文 献資料で見られない音韻の区別を示しており、それらが二次的に発達した改新 と説明できず、祖語に存在していた区別の保持と考えられる。つまり、それら の区別が奈良時代の日本語ではすでに消えており、日本語と琉球諸語が分かれ たのは奈良時代以前であると言える。このように下限を特定できるが、上限や それより詳しい年代推定は言語学からはできない。ただし、考古学などの他分 野の資料から見て、日琉祖語は社会の大きな変動が起こった弥生時代末期なし し古墳時代あたりに分岐した可能性が高い。琉球諸島の現代住民の直接の祖先 が平安時代になってから琉球列島に移住したという有力な仮説と一見矛盾する ように見えるが、琉球諸語が分岐してからその話し手がすぐに南下したのでは なくしばらく本土(恐らく九州地方)に在住していたと想定すれば解決される

    Ōgami (Miyako Ryukyuan)

    Get PDF
    International audienceGrammatical sketch of the Ōgami dialect of Miyako Ryukyua

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Data and code for “Contrasting modes of cultural evolution: Kra-Dai languages and weaving technologies”

    No full text
    Data and code for the article Buckley, Christopher D., Kopp, Emma, Pellard, Thomas, Ryder, Robin J., and Jacques, Guillaume, “Contrasting modes of cultural evolution: Kra-Dai languages and weaving technologies”

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore