1,720,955 research outputs found
PDBe-KB: collaboratively defining the biological context of structural data
The Protein Data Bank in Europe – Knowledge Base (PDBe-KB, https://pdbe-kb.org) is an open collaboration between world-leading specialist data resources contributing functional and biophysical annotations derived from or relevant to the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The goal of PDBe-KB is to place macromolecular structure data in their biological context by developing standardised data exchange formats and integrating functional annotations from the contributing partner resources into a knowledge graph that can provide valuable biological insights. Since we described PDBe-KB in 2019, there have been significant improvements in the variety of available annotation data sets and user functionality. Here, we provide an overview of the consortium, highlighting the addition of annotations such as predicted covalent binders, phosphorylation sites, effects of mutations on the protein structure and energetic local frustration. In addition, we describe a library of reusable web-based visualisation components and introduce new features such as a bulk download data service and a novel superposition service that generates clusters of superposed protein chains weekly for the whole PDB archive.ELIXIR [IDP implementation study]; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council via the 3D-Gateway [BB/T01959X/1]; FunPDBe [BB/P024351/1]; European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute who supported this work; J.D. acknowledges support from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic [INBIO CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008451]; R.S., K.B. and J.D. also acknowledge support from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic [ELIXIR-CZ LM2018131]; L.M. acknowledges support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme (H2020-INFRAIA-2018-1) [823839]; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G032816N, G042518N, G028821N]; W.V. acknowledges support from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G032816N, G028821N]; A.R. acknowledges support from the Fondazione Cassa Di Risparmio di Firenze [24316]; European Commission [101017567]; M.H.C. acknowledges the AIRC project to MHC [IG 23539]; J.F.-R. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-110167RB-I00]; N.R. acknowledges support from the Norwegian Research Council (Norges Forskningsråd) [288008]; E.D.L. acknowledges support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [819318]; M.J.E.S. acknowledges support from the Wellcome Trust [104955/Z/14/Z, 218242/Z/19/Z]. Funding for open access charge: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council grant [BB/T01959X/1]; Wellcome Trust [104955/Z/14/Z and 218242/Z/19/Z].Peer ReviewedCurrent PDBe-KB Consortium Members with Affiliations. (BSC author: Gonzalo Parra)
Mihaly Varadi1, Stephen Anyango, David Armstrong, John Berrisford, Preeti Choudhary, Mandar Deshpande, Nurul Nadzirin, Sreenath S. Nair, Lukas Pravda, Ahsan Tanweer, Bissan Al-Lazikani, Claudia Andreini, Geoffrey J. Barton, David Bednar, Karel Berka, Tom Blundell, Kelly P Brock, Jose Maria Carazo, Jiri Damborsky, Alessia David, Sucharita Dey, Roland Dunbrack, Juan Fernandez Recio, Franca Fraternali, Toby Gibson, Manuela Helmer-Citterich, David Hoksza, Thomas Hopf, David Jakubec, Natarajan Kannan, Radoslav Krivak, Manjeet Kumar, Emmanuel D Levy, Nir London, Jose Ramon Macias, Madhusudhan M. Srivatsan, Debora S Marks, Lennart Martens, Stuart A McGowan, Jake E McGreig, Vivek Modi, R. Gonzalo Parra, Gerardo Pepe16, Damiano Piovesan, Jaime Prilusky, Valeria Putignano, Leandro G. Radusky, Pathmanaban Ramasamy, Atilio O. Rausch, Nathalie Reuter, Luis A. Rodriguez, Nathan J Rollins, Antonio Rosato, Paweł Rubach, Luis Serrano, Gulzar Singh,Petr Skoda, Carlos Oscar S. Sorzano, Jan Stourac, Joanna I Sulkowska, Radka Svobodova, Natalia Tichshenko, Silvio C.E. Tosatto, Wim Vranken, Mark N Wass, Dandan Xue, Daniel Zaidman, Janet Thornton, Michael Sternberg, Christine Orengo, Sameer VelankarPostprint (published version
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
In Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
