1,720,979 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Blood component fractionation: Manual versus automatic procedures
No full textOver the last few years, quality system requirements have been introduced for blood components. The necessary compliance with standard productions will have a considerable impact on Blood Banks. The introduction of automated methods is the most satisfactory means to meet these requirements for blood component preparation. A new device has been developed to automate the fractionation of blood into components. We evaluated the efficacy of this instrument as compared to manual methods. A total of 218 units of blood have been collected, into several different commercial blood bag systems (77 into standard quadruple bag systems, 141 into bag systems with integrated in line filters), and used to evaluate the universality of the instrument. Whole blood units were processed using the Top/Top system and the Compomat G4 (Fresenius HemoCare). A separate program protocol was developed for each kind of bag. Use of the Compomat G4 resulted in a statistically significant (p<0.001) increase of the hemoglobin in filtered red cell concentrates (RCC) in comparison with the manual procedure, and a similar trend, even not statistically significant, has been observed for filtered RCC. Regardless of bag systems, we were able to observe a statistically significant increase of platelets in the platelet concentrates (PCs), when comparing automatic versus manual procedure. The automated procedure has been shown to be fast, and easy for the operators. This device reliably produces acceptable blood components, and has been shown adaptable to use with different blood bag systems. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Comparison of lymphocyte subsets in packed red blood cell (RBC) units leukodepleted with two in-line filters
No full text
Comparison of the effects of two in-line filters for the leukodepletion of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) units
No full text- …
