1,720,967 research outputs found

    IL DELFINO COMUNE DEL MEDITERRANEO: RICOSTRUZIONE DELLA STORIA ECOLOGICA ED EVOLUTIVA ATTRAVERSO I REPERTI OSTEOLOGICI

    No full text
    Il delfino comune (Delphinus delphis, Linnaeus, 1785) è una delle specie più enigmatiche del Mar Mediterraneo. Un tempo ampiamente diffusa, alla fine degli anni '60 ha subìto un declino significativo in gran parte del bacino. Le ragioni e i meccanismi alla base di questo declino rimangono in gran parte sconosciuti o poco compresi. Tuttavia, è stata identificata una serie di potenziali cause, tra cui le campagne di abbattimento, la morte accidentale in attrezzi da pesca, la ridotta disponibilità di prede e il degrado dell'habitat. Le stime attuali ottenute da indagini e campagne di monitoraggio suggeriscono la completa assenza o la quasi scomparsa dei delfini comuni dalle aree storicamente note per ospitare popolazioni consistenti. L'Unione Internazionale per la Conservazione della Natura ha designato la sottopopolazione di delfino comune del Mediterraneo come "Endangered". Abbiamo ricostruito la poco conosciuta storia naturale di questa specie utilizzando reperti museali osteologici degli ultimi due secoli. L'approccio multidisciplinare, che consiste nell'analisi genetica del DNA antico, nella morfometria geometrica dei crani e nell'analisi degli isotopi stabili del collagene, ha permesso di comprendere meglio l'ecologia della popolazione storica di delfino comune del Mediterraneo. I principali risultati della ricerca includono: i) l'approccio integrato molecolare/morfometrico ha permesso di identificare con successo gli esemplari museali a livello specie-specifico e di evidenziare errori di identificazione nelle collezioni museali e nella letteratura storica, i quali rappresentano un bias nell'identificazione delle specie di delfini mediterranei e nella conoscenza della loro storia demografica ed ecologica; ii) le analisi genomiche preliminari hanno evidenziato la perdita della diversità genetica di D. delphis nel corso degli ultimi decenni; ii) i risultati dell'analisi degli isotopi stabili (δ13C e δ15N) indicano diversi modelli ecologici e/o trofici del delfino comune mediterraneo nel corso del tempo, suggerendo un possibile spostamento della nicchia ecologica nel corso degli ultimi secoli. In conclusione, i risultati suggeriscono che il declino del delfino comune sia stato innescato da un insieme di fattori di natura antropogenica che hanno portato non solo alla competizione con l’uomo, ma anche a una competizione interspecifica con altre due specie ampiamente diffuse nel Mediterraneo: Stenella coeruleoalba e Tursiops truncatus

    UNVEILING THE ENIGMATIC NATURAL HISTORY OF MEDITERRANEAN COMMON DOLPHIN (DELPHINUS DELPHIS, LINNAEUS 1758): INSIGHTS FOR CONSERVATION CHALLENGES

    No full text
    The common dolphin (Delphinus delphis, Linnaeeus, 1785) is one of the most enigmatic species in the Mediterranean Sea. Once widely prevalent, it faced a significant decline across most of the basin by the late 1960s. The precise reasons and mechanisms behind this decline remain largely unknown or poorly understood. However, a range of potential causes has been identified, encompassing deliberate culling, accidental deaths in fishing gear, reduced prey availability, and habitat degradation. Present estimates derived from surveys and monitoring campaigns suggest either a complete absence or a near disappearance of common dolphins from areas historically known to harbor substantial populations. The International Union for Conservation of Nature has designated the Inner Mediterranean subpopulation of common dolphin as “Endangered”. We reconstructed the little-known natural history of this species using osteological museum finds from the last two centuries. The multidisciplinary approach consisting of genetic analysis on ancient DNA, geometric morphometry on skulls, and collagen stable isotope analysis, has enabled a better understanding of the ecology of the historical Mediterranean common dolphin population. The main findings of the research include: i) Incorrect taxonomic attributions in museum collections and historical literature represent a bias in the identification of Mediterranean dolphin species and in the knowledge of their demographic and ecological history over the past decades and centuries; ii) the molecular/morphometrical integrated approach permitted the successful species-specific identification of museum specimens and to highlight misidentifications and potential interspecific hybridization events between the rare Delphinus delphis and other more common species in the basin, such as Stenella coeruleoalba and Tursiops truncatus; iii) Results from stable isotope analysis (δ13C and δ15N) show different ecological and/or trophic patterns of Mediterranean common dolphin over time, indicating a possible shift in the ecological niche across the past centuries

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Tracing time's footprints: exploring feeding ecology and historical changes of Mediterranean common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) over two centuries

    No full text
    The Mediterranean population of common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) presents an enigmatic natural history in the last centuries. Once widely prevalent in the 19th and early 20th, it faced a significant decline across most of the basin by the late 1960s. The causes and mechanisms behind this decline remain largely unknown and poorly understood. The IUCN has designated the Inner Mediterranean population of common dolphins as Endangered. Here, we analyzed stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon (δ15N and δ13C) on skeletal remains collected in 22 Mediterranean natural history museums to investigate spatio-temporal trophic shifts and niche partitioning of the Mediterranean common dolphin over the past 200 years. We compared the isotope composition of historical common dolphins with those of the contemporary populations of Stenella coeruleoalba and Tursiops truncatus which co-occur in the Mediterranean occupying different habitats and trophic niches. We found that common dolphin individuals inhabiting the Mediterranean before 1970 occupied a significantly higher trophic level than the contemporary ones. The comparative analysis between dolphin species revealed that historically common dolphins occupied a well-defined isotopic niche separate from other species, while the contemporary populations shifted to overlap those of the striped dolphin. We cannot exclude that this significant ecological shift could be driven by habitat and trophic competition with human activities as prolonged and intense fishery stock exploitation has occurred in the basin. However, it appears that a key factor in the common dolphin's decline was competition with the striped dolphin, a widespread species in the region, that has effectively "squeezed" the common dolphin's habitat. This is the first long-term evidence of an ecological and/or trophic shift in the common dolphin Mediterranean population, which could be the starting point for understanding the causes and impacts of the species’ near-collapse in the Mediterranean

    Unveiling the enigmatic natural history of Mediterranean Common Dolphin (Delphinus delphis Linnaeus, 1758): Ecological and evolutionary insights for conservation challenges

    No full text
    The Mediterranean population of common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) presents an enigmatic natural history. Once widely prevalent, it faced a significant decline across most of the basin by the late 1960s (Bearzi et al., 2003). The precise reasons and mechanisms behind this decline remain largely unknown or poorly understood. However, a range of potential causes has been identified, encompassing deliberate culling, accidental deaths in fishing gear, reduced prey availability, and habitat degradation (Bearzi et al., 2008; Bearzi, Holcer, & Notarbartolo di Sciara, 2004; Piroddi et al., 2011). Present estimates derived from surveys and monitoring campaigns suggest either a complete absence or a near disappearance of common dolphins from areas historically known to harbor substantial populations. The International Union for Conservation of Nature has designated the Mediterranean population of common dolphins as Endangered (Bearzi et al., 2021). We reconstructed the little-known natural history of this population using Mediterranean museum skeletal specimens from the last two centuries. A multidisciplinary analytical approach, consisting of genetic analysis on ancient DNA, skull geometric morphometry, and collagen stable isotope analysis, in addition to data from strandings and historical documentation, has enabled a better understanding of the ecology of the historical Mediterranean common dolphin population. The main results are: i) the incorrect taxonomic attributions in museum collections and historical literature represent a low but significant bias in the identification of Mediterranean dolphin species and in the knowledge of their demographic and ecological history over the past decades and centuries; ii) 10% of museum specimens show a discrepancy between morphology and genetics and these could potentially represent evidence of interspecific hybridization events between the Delphinus delphis and other species more common in the basin, such as Stenella coeruleoalba and Tursiops truncatus; iii) the Mediterranean common dolphin population shows significant spatial heterogeneity in the ecological, trophic and distribution patterns

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore