283 research outputs found
Peeter Saarna Oral History
No full textOral histories created by University of Kansas students, staff and faculty as part of the Religion in Kansas Project are archived at http://hdl.handle.net/1808/12524 in KU ScholarWorks, the digital repository of the University of Kansas.Oral history interview with Pastor Peeter Saarna conducted by Aspen Grender in Kansas City, Kansas, on December 8, 2016. This interview features Peeter Saarna, a member of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification and pastor of the Kansas City Family Church in Kansas City. Pastor Saarna discusses his personal background and experiences as a self-described rebellious youth, his religious development and eventual exposure to the Unification Church and the teachings of Reverend Sun Myung Moon, his experience being matched with his wife Mieko, and the importance of interracial marriage in challenging racism. He also speaks about his time as a pastor in Topeka and the Church’s reception there, changes in public perception of Unificationism, the significance of ecumenical and interfaith discussion, and his plans and hopes for the future of the Church.Friends of the Department of Religious Studie
I remember Hoover Village at Seabrook
No full textIn this "I remember" memoir, Peeter Vilms recalls his youth at Seabrook. Since most adults worked in the fields, children of all cultures at Seabrook were sent to nursery school and day camp. Vilms found that comraderie with his diverse peers allowed him to learn English and make friends very easily. The Seabrook Educational and Cultural Center has been soliciting current and past residents of Seabrook Farms for an "I remember" project. Residents are asked to create narratives regarding their experiences at Seabrook Farms. These memories help preserve the history and multi-cultural heritage of Seabrook Farms
The Tartu School as a School
No full textPeeter ToropDepartment of Semiotics, University of Tartu"The Tartu School as a School"The paper addresses the question in what sense the Tartu school of semiotics constituted and still constitutes a coherent research community, and in what sense it can be called a school. The author discusses especially two aspects of this question: first, the Tartu school as a trend in semiotic research, and secondly, as a semiotic doctrine. The leading role of Yuri Lotman, the evolution of his thought, and his influence on the school during his lifetime and after his death are exposed as well as the contribution and impact of the school abroad
Beyond nostalgia: The exile publications of the Antwerp schoolmaster Peeter Heyns (1537-1598)
No full textIn 1585, the famous Antwerp schoolmaster, Peeter Heyns, fled from his hometown. After resettling in Haarlem, he published eight texts in the four years that he spent there. In all of them, the Antwerp background of the texts as well as their author is strongly emphasised. This article argues that the stress on Heyns’s roots as well as his hometown was part of a publication strategy designed to create both financial and emotional value by appealing to an interest in Antwerp shared by fellow migrants and the host community. This way of dealing with the past, using nostalgia not just as an emotional asset but also as a commercial one, sheds new light on the possible uses of nostalgic representations of the lost hometown by migrant authors
Szkoła tartuska jako szkoła
No full textPeeter ToropDepartment of Semiotics, University of Tartu"The Tartu School as a School"The paper addresses the question in what sense the Tartu school of semiotics constituted and still constitutes a coherent research community, and in what sense it can be called a school. The author discusses especially two aspects of this question: first, the Tartu school as a trend in semiotic research, and secondly, as a semiotic doctrine. The leading role of Yuri Lotman, the evolution of his thought, and his influence on the school during his lifetime and after his death are exposed as well as the contribution and impact of the school abroad.Peeter ToropDepartment of Semiotics, University of Tartu"The Tartu School as a School"The paper addresses the question in what sense the Tartu school of semiotics constituted and still constitutes a coherent research community, and in what sense it can be called a school. The author discusses especially two aspects of this question: first, the Tartu school as a trend in semiotic research, and secondly, as a semiotic doctrine. The leading role of Yuri Lotman, the evolution of his thought, and his influence on the school during his lifetime and after his death are exposed as well as the contribution and impact of the school abroad
Intersemiosis y traducción intersemiótica. Cuicuilco Revista de la Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia: Análisis del discurso y semiótica de la cultura: perspectivas analíticas para el tercer milenio Tomo II. Num. 25 (2002) Vol. 9 mayo-agosto
No full textCon base en la concepción de traducción total, este artículo describe diferentes tipos de comunicación textual en la cultura. El cambio en la ontología del texto en la cultura contemporánea -debido a la posibilidad de coexistencia simultánea de varias formas de un mismo texto en diferentes medios y discursos- permite considerar a la cultura como un proceso de traducción intersemiótica. La intertextualidad, la interdiscursividad y la intermedialidad -como entorno de generación y recepción textuales- conducen a considerar los signos de diferentes textos como una intersemiosis, comprendida simultáneamente en el marco de diferentes sistemas de signos.The article proceeds from the conception of total translation describing different types of textual communication in culture. The change on text´s ontology in contemporary culture due to the possible simultaneous existence of various forms of the same text in different media and discourses allows us to regard culture as the process of intersemiotic translation. Intertextuality, interdiscursivity and intermediality as the environment of text generation and reception impel us to regard the signs of different texts as intersemiosic, being comprehended simultaneously within the frameworks of different sign systems.Allott, Robbin. 1994 “Language and the Origin of Semiosis”, en Nöth, Winfried Nöth (ed.), Origins of Semiosis: Sign Evolution in Nature and Culture, Berlín, Nueva York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 225-268.Bernardelli, Andrea. 1997 “Introduction. The Concept of Intertextuality Thirty Year On: 1967–1997”, en Versus, núm. 77/78, pp. 3-22.Cachia, Fernando. 1983 “Ekranizacija klassihceskij literaturnyj proizvedenii na televidenii”, en Kultury, núm. 4, pp. 64-91.Carroll, John M.. 1997 “A program for Cinema Theory”, en The journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, XXXV, núm. 3, pp. 337-351.Caws, M. A. 1986 “Literal or Liberal: Translating Perception”, en Critical Inquiry, núm. 13 (1).Clüver, C.. 1989 “On Intersemiotic Transposition”, en Poetics Today, núm. 10 (1), pp. 55-90.Dubrovski, D.. 1979 “Rassifrovka kodov (Metodologicheskie aspekty problemy)”, en Voprosy filosofii, núm. 12.Eco, Umberto. 1977 A Theory of Semiosis, London, Basingstoke, MacMillan.Eco, Umberto. 1990 The Limits of Interpretation, Bloomington, India University Press.Eichenbaum, Boris. 1973 “Literatura i kino”en Iz istorii Lenfilma Vyp, núm. 3, Leningrad, Iskusstvo, pp. 29-31.Esslin, Martin. 1987 The Field of drama, London, Methuen.Fairclough, Norman. 1992 “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis”, en Discourse & Society, núm. 3 (2), pp. 193-217.Fawcett, Robin P.. 1984 “System Networks, Codes, and Knowlwdge of the Universe” en Fawcett, R. P. M. A. K. Halliday, S. M. Lamb, A. Makkai (eds.), The Semiotics of Culture and Language, vol. 2, Language and other Semiotic Systems of Culture, London-Dover N. H., Frances Printer, pp. 135-179.Gaifman, Hana A.. 1989 “Svejk Don Quixote Jesus Christ”, en Tobin Y. (ed.), From Sign to Text. A Semiotic View of Communication, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 191-213.Ginzburg, Lidia. 1979 O literaturnom geroje, Leningrad, Sovietski pisatel.Gombrich, Ernst Hans. 1972 “The visual Image”, en Scientific American, núm. 227 (3).Gorlée, Dinda. 1993 Semiotics and the Problem of Translation with Special Reference to the Semiotic of Charles S. Peirce, Alblasserdam, Offsetdrukkerij Kanters B.V.Greber, Erika. 1989 Intertextualität und Interpretierbarkeit des Texts. Zur früben Prosa Boris Pasternaks, München, Wilhelm Fink.Grivel, Charles. 1983 “Serien textueller Perzeption. Eine Skizze”, en Dialog der Texte=Winer Slawistischer Almanach Sonderb, núm. 11, Viena, pp. 291-360.Hannoosh, M.. 1986 “Painting as Translation in Baudelaire’s Art Criticism”, en Forum for Modern Language Studies, núm. 22 (1).Hansen-Löve, Aage A.. 1983 “Intermedialität und Intertextualität. Probleme der korrelation von Wort- und Bildkunst-Am Beispiel der russischen Moderne”, en Dialog der texte=Wiener Slawistischer Almanach Sonderb, núm. 11, Viena, pp. 291-360.Holmes, James S.. 1988 Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies, Amsterdam, Rodopi.Holthuis, Susanne. 1994 “Intertextuality and Meaning Constitution. An Approach to the Compre- hension of Intertextual Poetry”, en Petöfi, J. S., T. Olivi (eds.), Approaches to Poetry. Some Aspects of Textuality, Intertextuality and Intermediality, Berlín, Nueva York, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 77- 93.Hopfinger, Maryla. 1974 Adaptacje filmove utworów literackich. Problemy teorii i interpretaci, Wroclaw- Warzawa-Kraków-Gdansk, PAN.Jakobson, Roman. 1971 “On linguistic Aspects of Translation”, en Jakobson, R., Selected Writings, 2. Word and Language, The Hague-París, Mouton.Jensen, Klaus B.. 1995 The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication, London, Thousand Oaks, Nueva Delhi, Sage.Kibédi Varga, A.. 1989 “Criteria for Describing Word-and-Image Relations”, en Poetics Today núm. 10 (1), pp. 31-54.Kline, T. J.. 1992 Screening the Text. Intertextuality in New Wave French Cinema, Baltimore, Londres, The John’s Hopkins University Press.Koppenfels, W. V.. 1985 “Intertextualiät und Sprachwechsel: Die literatische Übersetzung”, en Broich, U. y M.Pfister, (eds.), Intertextualiät. Formen, Kunktionen, Anglistitche Fallstudien, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, pp. 137-158.Lachmann, Renate. 1989 “Concepts of Intertextuality”, en K. Eimermacher, K. P. Grzybek, y G. Witte (eds.), Issues in Slavic Literary and Cultural Theory, Bochum, Brockmeyer, pp. 391-400.Lotman, Iuri. 2000 La semiosfera III. Semiótica de las artes y de la cultura, Navarro, Desiderio (ed.), Madrid, Cátedra.Lotman, Juríj M.. 1990 Universe of the mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture, Londres, Nueva York, I. B. Tauris & Co.Lotman, Juríj M.. 1992 Izbrannie stati v trioj tomaj, vol. 1. Stati po semiotike i tipologii kultury, Tallinn, Aleksandra.Mamardashvili, Merab y A. Piatigorski. 1984 Simvol i soznanie (Metafizihceskie rassuzdenia o soznanii, simvolike i iazyke), Jerusalem.Mandel’stam, Osip. 1987 Slovo i kultura, Moskva, Sovietski pisatel.Mcfarlane, Brian. 1983 Words and Images. Australian Novel into film, Richmond.Menezes, Philadelpho. 1997 “Verbal and Visual Intersemiosis in Aesthetical Experiments. The Case of Contemporary Brazilian Culture”, en I. Rauch, G. y F. Carr (eds.), Semiotics around the world: Synthesis in Diversity, Berlín, Nueva York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 295-298.Mijalkov, Nikita. 1985 “Zdelat’ kartinu dlia vsej!”, en Sovietskaja kultura, núm. 16.03.Mijalkovich, V.. 1986 Izobrazitelni iazyk sredstv massovoi kommunikacii, Moskva.Parker, B.. 1986 “’Ran’ and the Tragedy of History”, en University of Toronto Quarterly, núm. 55 (4).Pfister, Manfred. 1985 “Konzepte der Intertextualität”, en U. Broich, M. Pfister (eds.), Intertextualitat. Formen Funktionen, anglistische Fallstudien, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, pp. 1-30.Plaza, Julio. 1987 Traducao Intersemiótica, Sao Paulo, Perspectiva.Portis-Winner, Irene. 1994 Semiotics of Culture: “The strange Intruder”, Bochum, Brockmeyer.Riffaterre, Michael. 1994 “Intertextuality vs. Hypertextuality”, en New Literary History, núm. 25 (4), pp. 778 y s.Robyns, C.. 1994 “Translation and Discursive Identity”, en Poetics Today, núm. 15 (3), pp. 405-428.Saparov, M.. 1982 “Slovesny obraz i zrimoje izobrazenie (zivopis-fotografija-slovo)”, en Literatura i zivopis, Leningrado, Nauka, pp. 66-92.Schulte, R.. 1980 “Translation: An Interpretative Act through Visualization”, en Translational Agent of Communication. A special Issue of Pacific Moana Quarterly, núm. 5 (1).Smirnov, Igor. 1985 “Porozdenie interteksta. (Elementy intertekstualnogo analiza s primerami iz tvorchestva B. L. Pasternaka)“, en Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, núm. 17 [edición especial].Toporov, Vladimir. 1992 “Translation: Sub Specie of Culture”, en Meta XXXVII, núm. 1, pp. 29-49.Toporov, Vladimir. 1993 “O ‘rezonantnom’ prostranstve literatury (neskolko zamechanii)”, en Poluchina, Andrew, V. J.y R. Reid (eds.), Literary Tradition and Practice in Russian Culture, Amsterdam, Atlanta, Rodopi, pp. 16-60.Torop, Peeter. 1995 Totalny perevod, Tartu, Tartu University Press.Torop, Peeter. 1998 “Granicy perevoda (sociosemioticeski aspect semiotiki perevoda)”, en Sign
Systems Studies, núm. 26, pp. 136-150.Tynianov, Jurij. 1973 “Libreto Kinofilma ‘Sinel’”, en Iz istorii Lenfilma. Vyp, núm. 3, Leningrado, Iskusstvo, pp. 78-80.Tynianov, Jurij. 1997 Poetika, istoria literatury, kino, Moskva, Nauka.Visconti, Lucchino. 1986 Stati. Svidetelstva. Vyskazyvania, Moskva, Iskusstvo.Voloshinov, Valentin. 1995 Filosofija i sociologia gumanitarnyj nauk, San Petesburgo, Acta Press.Vygotski, Lev. 1982 “Myslenie i rech”, en Vygotski, L., Sobranie sochineni v chesti tomaj, vol. 2, Moskva.White, A. R.. 1987 “Visualizing and Imagining Seeing”, en Analysis, núm. 47 (4), pp. 221-224.Zinkin, Nikolai. 1964 “O kodovyj perehodaj vo vnutrennei rechi”, en Voprosy iazykoznania, núm. 6, pp. 26-38
Intracellular pH Regulation and Buffer Capacity in CO2/HCO3 Buffered Media in Cultured Epithelial Cells from Rainbow Trout Gills.
No full textAbstract not availableJRC.(EI) - Environment Institut
Eesti kajastus välismeedias 2004.-2005. aasta Eesti Päevalehe ja Postimehe rubriikide „Teised meist” põhjal
No full textHans Lõugas’ bachelor’s thesis Reflection of Estonia in Foreign Media in 2004 and 2005
Based on Eesti Päevaleht’s and Postimees’ Sections “Teised meist” (Others about us) aims to
throw light on two questions: (1) how Estonia was reflected in foreign media during these two
important years, and (2) how this reflection is presented to readers of two Estonian national
dailies.
It can be concluded, that Estonia’s reflection in foreign media is diverse. News are presented
on the one hand from close countries like Finland (but not other neighbouring Baltic
countries), on the other hand from big and globally influential ones like Germany, Great
Britain and USA. This is still limited by two factors: firstly, what languages are spoken in the
newsrooms of the papers that present the foreign media, secondly, which articles are more
easily attainable for the editors.
The texts published during the two years indicate integration to Europe, in the political as well
as the cultural sphere because Estonia is attractive in the region as a new member of the
European Union. Discourse reflects different modalities in foreign news, because Estonia’s
groundbreaking achievements in tax policy and information technology are presented side by
side with deep social problems and conflicts in international relations.
At first some theoretical and empirical background about the topic is given. Peeter Vihalemm
has rooted the conceptions of social space and the index of social proximity that help to
characterize Estonia’s social relations with other countries. This is important as this paper’s
emphasis is on the years 2004 and 2005 when Estonia joined the European Union.
Furthermore, Jan Ekecrantz’ work about Swedish media is presented. Ekecrantz has analyzed
the representation of the Other in Swedish newspapers and shows some common conceptions
of Estonia as the Other.
The work conducted by the author involves three research methods. To begin with,
quantitative content analysis gave a general overview of the section “Teised meist”. This
method allowed for the analysis of 800 texts published in 2004 and 2005. Secondly,
qualitative analysis gave an insight into the meanings represented in the texts. Finally, an interview with Eesti Päevaleht’s editor Kaarel Tarand threw light on the newsroom work
process and how the texts to be translated were selected from foreign media.http://tartu.ester.ee/record=b2114262~S1*es
Ivs Belgarvm circa bvllarvm pontificiarvm receptionem.
No full textDate derived from f. D2 rectoProbably printed in Brussels in the second half of the 17th century as a part of a yet unseen edition of Petrus Stockmans' 'Opera omnia'Vingerafdruk: 000004 - # b1 B2 rsi : # b2 H2 usaHerkomst: J de Bonny [?]Dekkers, R. Bib. Belgica juridica p. 166, Stockmans, Pieter, nr. 5Europeana-GoogleBooksDe Bast-Armellini, Camill
- …
