1,721,009 research outputs found
Comparison of different pilot scale bioreactors for the treatment of a real wastewater from the textile industry
Wastewater from textile industry usually undergoes activated sludge biotreatment ahead of refining treatments, final discharge or reuse. To identify the most effective bioreactor typology for the secondary treatment of a wastewater resulting from a textile industry of the Biella district (Italy), four pilot units characterized by a different configuration and fluid dynamics (i.e., Bioflotation, Fixed Bed Biofilm Reactor (FBBR), flow-jet aeration and standard aerobic sludge reactors) were operated in parallel, inoculated with the same microbial consortium and fed with identical streams of wastewater discharged from wet textile processes of the industy. COD, TC and non-ionic surfactants were monitored in effluents of the compared bioreactors working under continuous mode and the cultivable heterotrophic microorganisms prevailing in each of them were isolated and characterized as the end of the study. The results demonstrated that the air supply system greatly influenced the treatment efficiency which reached the
highest value in the case of Bioflotation and FBBR technology. A highly specialized bacterial biomass mostly composed by strains of the Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Ochrobactrum genera was isolated
in such reactors, thus suggesting that a direct correlation between reactor configuration, decontamination performances and microbial biomass composition exis
Comparison of different technologies for textile wastewater treatment.
Textile wastewaters are usually subjected to secondary activated sludge treatment before being discharged in the environment or re-used. In order to improve the efficiency of this treatment, four reactors possessing different configurations and fluid dynamic characteristics (i.e. a Bioflotation® system; a fixed bed biofilm reactor (FBBR) filled with polypropylene balls; a flow-jet aeration system and a conventional activated sludge reactor) were developed and fed with a textile industry wastewater. COD, TC and non ionic surfactant concentrations were monitored in the reactor effluents and the cultivable heterotrophic biomass was isolated from the effluents. The results evidenced that the fluid dynamic characteristics and the air supply system can greatly influence the degradation efficiency of the secondary treatment. In particular, Bioflotation® and FBBR technologies appear to be the most efficient in term of pollutant removal. An highly specialized biomass, rich in strains belonging to the Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas genera, was evidenced in these reactors, thus allowing to conclude that there is a direct correlation among reactor configuration, biomass specialization and reactor performances
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Comparison of different pilot scale bioreactors for the treatment of a real wastewater from the textile industry
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
