1,721,004 research outputs found
TREATMENT OF EXTERNAL ANORECTAL MUCOSAL PROLAPSE WITH CIRCULAR STAPLER AN EASY AND EFFECTIVE NEW TECHNIQUE
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility, effectiveness, and reliability of a new technique for treating overt rectal mucosal prolapse using a stapler device.
METHODS:
Eighteen consecutive patients with overt rectal mucosal prolapse were selected for the study. Preoperative anal manometry and cinedefecography demonstrated no anal incontinence and the absence of full-thickness rectal prolapse. One or two purse strings were prepared 3 to 4 cm distally to the dentate line and tied on a 33 mm circular stapler introduced through the anus and then fired.
RESULTS:
The operation lasted an average of 15 minutes, and no local complications were recorded. Supplementary hemostatic sutures (2 to 6 stitches) were sometimes necessary. Seven patients did not require postoperative analgesia, whereas eight patients received one or two administrations of analgesics. Longer-lasting analgesic treatment (4 days) was necessary in only three patients. Sixteen patients were discharged after 48 hours, and only 1 after four days because of pulmonary infection. Patients resumed normal activities after a median period of three days. Median follow-up was 20 months. The prolapse was eliminated in all cases. No stricture was found at anal exploration, and no episodes of anal incontinence or bleeding were recorded. Postoperative manometry did not show significant changes compared with preoperative findings.
CONCLUSIONS:
This new surgical technique is safe, effective, and rapid, causing minimum or no postoperative pain and could be proposed to replace traditional surgery for this common conditio
The management of esophago-gastric necrosis due to caustics ingestion: Anastomotic reinforcement with Cyanoacrylate glue and damage control with Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy—A case report
Introduction: The surgical treatment of a complete gastric necrosis due to caustic ingestion is extremely challenging and life threatening. In this emergency scenario, a first-time reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract is often dangerous for the patient because of the high risk of infections and anastomosis leakage. Literature lacks of clear indications for the management of this condition. Presentation of case: Male patient with history of major depression disorder was admitted to our Emergency Unit after the ingestion of muriatic acid. CT scan showed massive pneumo-peritoneum with esophago-gastric thickening. Free fluids in the abdominal cavity were detected. Intraoperative finding was a complete necrosis of the stomach and corrosion of the lower esophagus. Discussion: In this case report we proposed a first approach with the drainage and lavage of the abdomen cavity. Then, an esophago-jejunum anastomosis reinforced by Cyanoacrylate glue was performed and a damage control with VAC therapy (Vacuum Assisted Closure) was carried out. Conclusion: Cyanoacrylate glue could be considered useful and efficient in the reinforcement of anastomosis even in emergency surgical procedures. Damage control using VAC allows to keep a good control of the surgery performed
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
