1,720,972 research outputs found

    Markov Chain based method for in-domain and cross-domain sentiment classification

    No full text
    Sentiment classification of textual opinions in positive, negative or neutral polarity, is a method to understand people thoughts about products, services, persons, organisations, and so on. Interpreting and labelling opportunely text data polarity is a costly activity if performed by human experts. To cut this labelling cost, new cross domain approaches have been developed where the goal is to automatically classify the polarity of an unlabelled target text set of a given domain, for example movie reviews, from a labelled source text set of another domain, such as book reviews. Language heterogeneity between source and target domain is the trickiest issue in cross-domain setting so that a preliminary transfer learning phase is generally required. The best performing techniques addressing this point are generally complex and require onerous parameter tuning each time a new source-target couple is involved. This paper introduces a simpler method based on the Markov chain theory to accomplish both transfer learning and sentiment classification tasks. In fact, this straightforward technique requires a lower parameter calibration effort. Experiments on popular text sets show that our approach achieves performance comparable with other works

    Cross-domain sentiment classification via polarity-driven state transitions in a Markov model

    No full text
    Nowadays understanding people’s opinions is the way to success, whatever the goal. Sentiment classification automates this task, assigning a positive, negative or neutral polarity to free text concerning services, products, TV programs, and so on. Learning accurate models requires a considerable effort from human experts that have to properly label text data. To reduce this burden, cross-domain approaches are advisable in real cases and transfer learning between source and target domains is usually demanded due to language heterogeneity. This paper introduces some variants of our previous work [1], where both transfer learning and sentiment classification are performed by means of a Markov model. While document splitting into sentences does not perform well on common benchmark, using polarity-bearing terms to drive the classification process shows encouraging results, given that our Markov model only considers single terms without further context information

    Job recommendation from semantic similarity of LinkedIn users' skills

    No full text
    Until recently job seeking has been a tricky, tedious and time consuming process, because people looking for a new position had to collect information from many different sources. Job recommendation systems have been proposed in order to automate and simplify this task, also increasing its effectiveness. However, current approaches rely on scarce manually collected data that often do not completely reveal people skills. Our work aims to find out relationships between jobs and people skills making use of data from LinkedIn users' public profiles. Semantic associations arise by applying Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). We use the mined semantics to obtain a hierarchical clustering of job positions and to build a job recommendation system. The outcome proves the effectiveness of our method in recommending job positions. Anyway, we argue that our approach is definitely general, because the extracted semantics could be worthy not only for job recommendation systems but also for recruiting systems. Furthermore, we point out that both the hierarchical clustering and the recommendation system do not require parameters to be tuned

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore