1,720,981 research outputs found
INSIGHT INTO THE INTERCALATION PROBLEM OF THE LI/CUO CELL BY ANALYTICAL ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPIES
No full text
SURFACE ANALYTICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ANHYDROUS AND HYDRATED RUTHENIUM DIOXIDE POWDERS BY XPS
No full textANALYTICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF A SURFACE STANDARD - USE OF COMPLEMENTARY TECHNIQUES (XPS, UPS, EELS)
No full textAnalytical characterization of electrode systems by surface spectroscopies: advantages and limits. A brief review
No full textA brief review is proposed with the aim of illustrating the many powerful ways in which the analytical characterization of electrode surfaces can support electrochemical and electroanalytical studies. Both advantages and limits in coupling surface electron spectroscopies (mainly XPS) and electrochemical techniques are outlined by selected examples from authors' and others' production. The need of high quality digital data for a reliable curve fitting of spectra is stressed
New findings on polypyrrole chemical structure by XPS coupled to chemical derivatization labelling
No full text
ANALYTICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ELECTRODE SURFACE BY X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON-SPECTROSCOPY - BETA-PBO2-BASED CATHODE IN VOLTAGE-COMPATIBLE LITHIUM CELLS
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
