1,694 research outputs found
Louis P. Lochner; Ludwig "Louis" Paul Lochner
No full textPosed, head and shoulders. Lochner in war correspondent's uniform. On verso: Louis P. Lochner."Ludwig 'Louis' Paul Lochner (February 22, 1887-January 8, 1975) was an American political activist, journalist, and author." He served for many years as head of the Berlin bureau of Associated Press, best remembered for his work there as a foreign correspondent. Lochner was awarded the 1939 Pulitzer Prize for correspondence for his wartime reporting from Nazi Germany."(Wikipedia
Letter from L. P. Lochner & C. F. Smith to [John Muir], 1909 Sep 7.
No full textONE DOLLAR PAYS ASSOCIATION DUES AND SUBSCRIPTION FOR THE MAGAZINE FOR ONE YEARALUMNI ASSOCIATION of the University of WisconsinEXECUTIVE COMMITTEBALBERT J. OCHSNKR, \u2784. . PRESIDENTMISS ELIZABETH WATERS, \u2785, VICE-PRESIDENTWILLARD G. BLEYER, \u2796 - REC. SECRETARYMATTHEW S. DUDGEON, \u2795 - TREASURERJ. GLENN WRAY, \u2798MRS. JOHN M. OLIN, \u2776ROBERT G. SIEBECKER, \u2778CHARLES N. BROWN, LAW \u2781TIMOTHY L. HARRINGTON, \u2790LOUIS P. LOCHNER, \u2709, Alumni Fellow in Journalism, CHARLES F. SMITH. Jr., \u2708, Bnaineaa Manager,Acting Editor. Box 1127. Phone 2893 1715 Adama Ave. Phone 1878GEORGE W. BLANCHARD, \u2706, Advertising Manager. 615 Lake St. Phone 193Wisconsin Alumni MagazinePOUNDED IN 1899Madison, Wis., September 7, 1909.Fellow Alumnus:Please read the inclosed letter from Doctor Ochsner, the President of the Wisconsin Alumni Association. In it he makes clear the duty of every loyal Alumnus of Wisconsin. You will notice that the first duty which he enumerates is that of subscribing-for the magazine, which depends on you for its existence. It is in regard to this duty that I want to call your especial attention.From a financial point of view, we have sufficient subscribers already to maintain an Alumni Magazine. It must necessarily be our object, however, to improve the magazine from year to year. Such an improvement in the first place demands more money to support it, which money must come from new subscriptions. We.cannot cease to appeal to the Alumni for help until every graduate of the University is enrolled on our subscription list.Aside from the financial side, there is the desire on the part of those interested that the magazine should carry its messages to every Alumnus, so that this large and powerful body of Alumni may combine in using its influence for the good of the University. This is the primary aim of the Alumni Magazine,-to bring the Alumni into closer communication with each other and with the University. It is certainly worth at least one dollar to maintain this one remaining link to bind you to the University.We appeal to you to subscribe at once to the Wisconsin Alumni Magazine for one year as a trial. Surely it deserves that much support from every Alumnus, and if after giving it a trial, you find it not worth while, then you have done your duty. Subscribe now and help us to get out a magazine that will far surpass any other Alumni Magazine in the country. All you have to do is to fill out the inclosed slip.and forward it and one dollar to the Wisconsin Alumni Magazine, Box 1127, Madison, Wis.Yours sincerely,L. P. Lochner, Acting Editor,C. P. Smith, Jr., Business Manager.A LIVE. MONTHLY MAGAZINE IN WHICH IT PAYS TO ADVERTISE. GUARANTEED CIRCULATION04579https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmcl/31253/thumbnail.jp
Das Seltene Alter betrachtet so wol in denen verlängerten Jahren der Alt-Vätter/ Als beseufzet bei dem izt leider verkürzetem Rest derselben : Samt dessen eigentlichen Ursachen / von M. Carl Friderich Lochnern/ P. J. F.
No full textForeword: What\u27s So Wicked About Lochner?
No full textIn this brief Foreword to a forthcoming symposium on Lochner v. New York, Professor Randy Barnett asks the question, What\u27s So Wicked About Lochner? Modern Progressives cannot complain about its protection of so-called substantive due process, since they favor just that. Nor can they claim that Lochner violates the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, since these legal analysts by and large reject originalism altogether. This leaves only today\u27s judicial conservatives to adhere to a purified Roosevelt New Deal jurisprudence of disdain for Lochner. The author answers that Lochner is objectionable precisely because its reliance on the Due Process Clause perpetuated the serious misinterpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment established by the 5-4 decision in the Slaughter-House Cases. While Lochner\u27s use of a presumption in favor of the liberty of citizens is basically sound—however well it may have been applied in the actual case—its reliance on the Due Process Clause, rather than on the Privileges or Immunities Clause, undermined the legitimacy of its method. The author offers the outline of an approach to Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment that gives a distinct meaning to each of its four Constitution-altering clauses
Learning from Lochner: Critical Theory from the Corpse of the Lochner Zombie
No full textabstract: In modern legal and political debates, Lochner v. New York is regularly praised by libertarians for its rejection of economic regulation. To understand the libertarian impulse for revitalizing the Lochner decision, we must examine the foundations Lochner was decided on and the cases and laws that led to the end of the Lochner Era. The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (Wagner Act) was passed as a counter-revolution to the anti-regulatory framework of the Lochner Era, and it found its legal accompaniment in the West Coast Hotel and NLRB v. Jones decisions. Some retrenchment followed: The Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act) was passed to undercut the Wagner Act in ways that is possible to see as either a return to Lochnerism or as the rise of an executive supremacy argument in to the labor market. Writing during the negotiations of Taft-Hartley, Max Horkheimer, in Eclipse of Reason, explicitly rejects the economic premises that Taft-Harley rests upon and criticizes its logic of governance. We can learn from Horkheimer’s critique of the rationality behind the Taft-Hartley Act in order to understand the fundamental issues with the Lochner decision and modern libertarian attempts at confining governmental regulation to means that ensure the functioning of free-markets. This paper analyzes the economic rationality of the Wagner and Taft-Hartley Acts, arguing that the Wagner Act was a rejection of Locherian logic and that there is latent Lochnerian premises within the Taft-Hartley Act. This paper defines the Lochner zombie and seeks to understand the attractive power that the decision has on modern legal thought. Libertarian groups use the premises of the Lochner decision, civil rights and protection of contract as a means to render all, or almost all, governmental market regulation unconstitutional. I will be examining the cases of Lochner v. New York and West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish. In doing so, I will be utilizing the legal theories of Roberto Mangabeira Unger and the critical theory of Max Horkheimer as a framework for understanding the resurrection of the Lochner zombie. Part of the purpose of this paper is to establish a linkage between Horkheimer’s analysis of means-ends rationality and the reconstructive legal interpretation advocated by Unger. Using both Unger and Horkheimer together allows for a more robust critique of the ever more dominating libertarian legal theories. The Taft-Hartley Act and modern libertarian attacks on governmental regulation seek to replace the institutional and regulatory model of the Wagner Act with a theory of legal disciplinarity bound to economics and contract theory such that it would systematically exclude ethical and social justice forms of rationality from the canons of legal thinking. I counter this by proposing legal interdisciplinarity that utilizes critical theory and rationalizing legal analysis to promote democratization and governmental regulation. The only way to slay the Lochner zombie is to develop a reconstructive theory of law as a discipline situated relative to economics and other social sciences
Recommended from our members
The Lochner era and comparativeconstitutionalism
No full textThe Lochner era exerts a powerful hold over the American constitutional imagination. I want to explore a related phenomenon that has received insufficient attention from students of comparative constitutionalism—namely, the role of the Lochner era in constitutional discourse outside of the United States. Instead of serving as a positive model for drafting and construing constitutional provisions, the Lochner era serves as a negative guide to constitutionalism. I argue that Lochner has three distinct meanings. First, Lochner stands for judicial activism, understood as the constitutionalization of judicial policy preferences. Second, Lochner is synonymous with economic libertarianism. Finally, Lochner represents constitutional crisis. Lochner discourse illustrates that comparative constitutional experience can function dialogically, by furnishing narratives of constitutional failure that facilitate and enable constitutional choice. Learning across jurisdictions does not simply mean the transplantation and/or adaptation of positive constitutional models. Rather, it further entails the avoidance of negative models or constitutional pathologies, which can serve as foils to highlight the potentially worrisome implications of certain institutional, textual and interpretive options.</p
Anhang; Oder Beschreibung der Provinzien Aus denen die so berühmte Halb-Insel Morea bestehet ...
No full textSchlüsselseiten aus dem Exemplar der ULB Halle: AB 44 4/i, 12 (2)18 Portr. u. 22 Ill. (Kupferst.
Rehabilitating Lochner
No full textThis Article examines the background and debates on the framing of the fourteenth amendment, in light of the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lochner v. New York. The author focuses on the framing of section 1 of the fourteenth amendment, as well as the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and argues that the Thirty-ninth Congress, which framed the amendment, was strongly dedicated to securing the material rights. He further argues that the Framers regarded due process as a general guarantee for natural and fundamental rights, which included liberty of contract and of private ownership, yet, at the time the amendment was framed and ratified, and for some time thereafter, a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court regarded due process as safeguarding vested property interests, but not contractual freedom. The author argues that, by the time of the Lochner case, the Court had erased this distinction and secured liberty of contract, and that this development was consistent with the Framers\u27 meaning of due process
Artist Interview - Lochner | Carmichael
No full textLochner|Carmichael are Jillian Lochner, who has worked as a commercial photographer for many years in fashion and on brand campaigns, and Andrew Carmichael, who arrived in commercial photography via a fine-art route. Lochner’s past clients include the likes of Absolut vodka, American Express, Levi’s and the New York Times Magazine; Carmichael has shown art at the ICA in London and in Vienna and Madrid. They started to work together creating still-life photography in 2014 and their collaborations have been featured in Italian Vogue, Sunday Telegraph Luxury, Amica and Creative Review.
Their work together is a genuine collaboration: each has their strengths and areas of expertise, but their joint creative output is very much the result of two minds; you could not say that one was the author and the other the support. Lochner brings great sensibility, a restrained palette and love of the flat image. Carmichael brings his making and sculptural background and a love of depth and perspective.
Prior to shooting, ideas are finessed, tested and critiqued. During the image-making process they are tested and critiqued further and then re-touched — all as a collaborative endeavour. Each has trust in the other, and as long as one is emotionally committed to an idea, they will work with each other until a successful outcome is achieved or will mutually agree to abandon it to mine another seam. They are a husband-and-wife team who know each other very well; they see their mutual support as a great strength
Die prognostische Validität des Interviews in der Führungskräfteauswahl
No full textLochner-Hannen P. Die prognostische Validität des Interviews in der Führungskräfteauswahl. Berichte aus der Psychologie. Aachen: Shaker; 2002
- …
