66 research outputs found
Relativistic models for the BepiColombo radioscience experiment
No full textTo test General Relativity with the tracking data of the BepiColombo Mercury orbiter we need relativistic models for the orbits of Mercury and of the Earth, for the light-time and for all the spatio-temporal reference frames involved, with accuracy corresponding to the measurements: 10 cm in range, 2 micron/s in range-rate, over 2 years. For the dynamics we start from the Lagrangian post-Newtonian (PN) formulation, using a relativistic equation for the solar system barycenter to avoid rank deficiency. In the determination of the PN parameters, the difficulty in disentangling the effects of β from the ones of the Sun's oblateness is confirmed. We have found a consistent formulation for the preferred frame effects, although the center of mass is not an integral. For the identification of strong equivalence principle (SEP) violations we use a formulation containing both direct and indirect effects (through the modified position of the Sun in a barycentric frame). In the light-time equations, the Shapiro effect is modeled to PN order 1 but with an order 2 correction compatible with (Moyer 2003). The 1.5-PN order corrections containing the Sun's velocity are not relevant at the required level of accuracy. To model the orbit of the probe, we use a mercury-centric reference frame with its own "Mercury Dynamic Time": this is the largest and the only relativistic correction required, taking into account the major uncertainties introduced by non-gravitational perturbations. A delicate issue is the compatibility of our solution with the ephemerides for the other planets, and for the Moon, which cannot be improved by the BepiColombo data alone. Conversely, we plan to later export the BepiColombo measurements, as normal points, to contribute with their unprecedented accuracy to the global improvement of the planetary ephemerides
Narrow-Angle and Wide-Angle Astrometry via Long Baseline Optical/Infrared Interferometers
No full textLong baseline optical/infrared interferometers, such as the Mark III Stellar Interferometer on Mt. Wilson and the ASEPS-0 Testbed Interferometer on Palomar Mountain, California, have good capabilities for narrow-angle and wide-angle astrometry with very high precision. Using the Mark III Interferometer many spectroscopic binaries became “visual” for the first time. The measurement accuracy of angular separation is 0.2 mas, the smallest separation measured between two components is 2 mas, the maximum magnitude difference is 4 mag, and the smallest semimajor axis is 4 mas. Such high angular resolution and dynamic range have been used to determine stellar masses with precision of 2% and differential stellar luminosities to better than 0.05 mag for separations of less than 0.″2. For some binary stars, not only have the systems been resolved, but also the diameter of the primary component has been determined, yielding direct measurements of stellar effective temperature with high accuracy. For parallax determination, the precision is 1 mas or better and is unaffected by interstellar extinction. For wide-angle astrometry with the Mark III interferometer, the observation results yielded average formal 1σ errors for FK5 stars of about 10 mas. Presently a new infrared interferometer, the ASEPS-0 Testbed Interferometer on Palomar Mountain is under construction, and is being optimized to perform high accuracy narrow-angle astrometry using long baseline observations at 2.2 μm, with phase referencing for increased sensitivity. The goal is to demonstrate differential astrometric accuracies of 0.06–0.1 mas in order to allow for detection of extra-solar planets in the near future
Toward inertial reference frames with the SIM observatory
No full textThe SIM Lite Observatory is expected to provide a global astrometric reference frame surpassing the 1-μas accuracy threshold in some spherical harmonics. A range of time-varying physical distortions of the reference frame will become observable as large-scale perturbations of the proper motion field. I consider the main sources of the apparent and physical motion of reference objects, such as the aberration of light caused by the acceleration of SIM, long gravitational waves and hypothetical rotation of the Universe, and present some estimates of the astrometric sensitivity to these effects. I argue that a global solution and covariance analysis is of crucial importance for the SIM mission to differentiate the inevitable accidental and systematic zonal errors from real physical phenomena
Cooperative engineer. Vol. 36 No. 1 (October 1958)
No full textContents:
Frontispiece - Facets of Sales
Avenues of Engineering: Sales, by Robert Frazer
Memory Systems, by Gary Clinehens
The Hikers, by Jerry Shiffer
Differential Transformers, by Kenneth P. Seidelmann
Let's Plug in the Sun, by Paul Montgomery
Co-op Calendar: Miss Barbara Brown
New Staff
What I Think: Only Work Widens, by John Welch
Quadrangle News
News Briefs, by Jack Snarr
Brain Teasers, by E. M. TakahashiPublished quarterly from 1921-1975 by the students and alumni of the College of Engineering, University of Cincinnati
- …
