21,218 research outputs found
A 2 h periodic variation in the low-mass X-ray binary Ser X-1
No full textSpectroscopy of the low-mass X-ray binary Ser X-1 using the Gran Telescopio Canarias have revealed a ?2 h periodic variability that is present in the three strongest emission lines. We tentatively interpret this variability as due to orbital motion, making it the first indication of the orbital period of Ser X-1. Together with the fact that the emission lines are remarkably narrow, but still resolved, we show that a main-sequence K dwarf together with a canonical 1.4 M? neutron star gives a good description of the system. In this scenario, the most likely place for the emission lines to arise is the accretion disc, instead of a localized region in the binary (such as the irradiated surface or the stream-impact point), and their narrowness is due instead to the low inclination (?10°) of Ser X-1
r-barnes/richdem: Zenodo DOI Release
No full text<p>RichDEM is a set of digital elevation model (DEM) hydrologic analysis tools. RichDEM uses parallel processing and state of the art algorithms to quickly process even very large DEMs.</p>
<p>RichDEM offers a variety of flow metrics, such as D8 and D∞. It can flood or breach depressions. It can calculate flow accumulation, slops, curvatures, &c.</p>
<p>RichDEM is available as a performant C++ library, a low-dependency Python package, and a set of command-line tools.</p>
Repositioning the graphic designer as researcher
No full textIn academic terms, the discipline of graphic design is relatively young. Consequently the position of the discipline within academic territory, and the role of the designer, continue to be debated. In part, these debates have been a product of attempts to define and defend the discipline’s borders from within, in order to establish a sense of the role of graphic design and the graphic designer as commensurate with other disciplines both within and beyond art and design. In recent years graphic designers have variously been defined as ‘authors’, ‘producers’ and ‘readers’, yet none of these definitions seem to have provided any kind of productive or lasting impact within the academy. This paper suggests that rather than continue to seek territorial definitions and positions from within, it could be more productive to look beyond the confines of the discipline. Gaining a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on, and understanding of, qualitative research methods from other disciplines may enable the graphic designer to more fully position his or her practice within the wider academy. Such a perspective could help facilitate the repositioning and redefinition of the graphic designer as ‘researcher’ - a move that would be productive in relation to the future development of postgraduate research within the discipline
64. Barnes (T. D.), Constantine and Eusebius
No full textNautin Pierre. 64. Barnes (T. D.), Constantine and Eusebius. In: Revue des Études Grecques, tome 98, fascicule 465-466, Janvier-juin 1985. p. 217
cheryl-barnes/Predation_TrophicStability: Ecological Applications Publication Release v1.0.0
No full textCitation: Barnes, C. L., A. H. Beaudreau, M. W. Dorn, K. K. Holsman, and F. J. Mueter. 2020. Development of a predation index to assess trophic stability in the Gulf of Alaska. Ecological Applications.
Overview
This repository details the methods used to calculate indices of predation for Walleye Pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) in the Gulf of Alaska (MT per year; 1990 to 2015). Pollock predators included: Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomias), Pacific Cod (Gadus macrocephalus), Pacific Halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis), Sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), and Walleye Pollock conspecifics. We used predation indices to estimate synchrony in pollock consumption and make inferences about trophic stability among demersal fishes in the Gulf of Alaska.
File Structure
Input data (survey and food habits) and shapefiles can be found in Folder 1 ('1_Data' folder). Folders 2 through 5 contain species-specific analyses and resulting estimates for each component of the predation index. Results from distribution/density models (i.e., large .rda files) were not included. Folder 6 contains predation indices (all predators combined) for each of the spatial scales of interest: basin, the area encompassed by the stock assessment for Gulf of Alaska pollock, subregion, and statistical area. Script files in Folder 6 also include variance ratio calculations, which enabled estimates of synchrony and portfolio effects. Specific analyses that resulted in publication tables and figures are noted throughout.
All analyses were conducted using R v3.6 (R Core Team 2018).
Data Sources
Total Predator Biomass: Total biomass estimates were obtained from the most recent stock assessment for each groundfish predator (Barbeaux et al. 2017, Dorn et al. 2017, Hanselman et al. 2017, Spies et al. 2017, Stewart and Hicks 2017). Coast-wide estimates for Pacific Halibut were adjusted to reflect biomass in the Gulf of Alaska.
Relative Predator Densities: Bottom trawl survey data (all groundfish predators; 1990 to 2017) were collected by the Resource Assessment and Conservation Engineering (RACE) Division of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC, NOAA) and are publicly accessible at https://www.afsc.noaa.gov/RACE/groundfish/survey_data/data.htm. See von Szalay et al. (2016) for information about bottom trawl survey design and data collection methods. Setline survey data (Pacific Halibut; 1998 to 2017) were collected by the International Pacific Halibut Commission and are publicly available at: https://iphc.int/data/fiss-data-query. For setline survey methods, see Clark and Hare (2006). Longline survey data (Sablefish; 1990 to 2017) were collected by the AFSC's Auke Bay Laboratories and can be found at https://www.afsc.noaa.gov/maps/longline/Map.php. See Sigler and Zenger (1989) for methods descriptions of the longline survey.
Mean Annual Rations and Age-specific Proportions of Pollock Consumed: Food habits data (all groundfish predators; 1990 to 2015) were provided by the AFSC's Resource Ecology and Ecosystem Modeling (REEM) Program and are publicly accessible at: https://access.afsc.noaa.gov/REEM/WebDietData/DietDataIntro.php. For food habits data collection and processing methods, see Livingston et al. (2017).
Financial and Logistical Support
This project was funded by the Pollock Conservation Cooperative Research Center (G00009488) and the Rasmuson Fisheries Research Center associated with the University of Alaska Fairbanks. An anonymous donor supplied additional funds via the Northern Gulf of Alaska Applied Research Award. The University of Alaska (Juneau Fisheries Division and Southeast Sitka Campus) provided facilities and additional support.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate assistance with data acquisition and processing from Kerim Aydin, Steve Barbeaux, Troy Buckley, Dana Hanselman, Tom Kong, Geoff Lang, Wayne Palsson, and Ian Stewart. Jordan Watson and Lorenzo Ciannelli provided guidance on the initial development of spatial models. Mary Hunsicker and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments to improve upon the analyses detailed here.
The authors would like to acknowledge Terry Quinn for offering his insight and expertise during earlier stages of this project. We have dedicated this work to him.
References
Stock Assessments
Barbeaux, S., K. Aydin, B. Fissel, K. Holsman, and W. Palsson. 2017. Assessment of the Pacific cod stock in the Gulf of Alaska. North Pacific Fishery Management Council Gulf of Alaska SAFE Report 189–332.
Dorn, M., K. Aydin, B. Fissel, D. Jones, A. McCarthy, W. Palsson, and K. Spalinger K. 2017. Assessment of the Walleye Pollock stock in the Gulf of Alaska. North Pacific Fishery Management Council Gulf of Alaska SAFE Report 47–182.
Hanselman, D. H., C. J. Rodgveller, C. R. Lunsford, and K. H. Fenske. 2017. Assessment of the Sablefish stock in Alaska. North Pacific Fishery Management Council Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska SAFE Report 327–502.
Spies, I., K. Aydin, J. N. Ianelli, and W. Palsson. 2017. Assessment of the Arrowtooth Flounder stock in the Gulf of Alaska. North Pacific Fishery Management Council Gulf of Alaska SAFE Report 749–846.
Stewart, I., and A. Hicks. 2017. Assessment of the Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) stock at the end of 2017. International Pacific Halibut Commission IPHC-2018-AM094-10.
Survey and Food Habits Data
Clark, W. G., and S. R. Hare. 2006. Assessment and management of Pacific halibut: data, methods, and policy. IPHC Scientific Report 83.
Livingston, P. A., K. Aydin, T. W. Buckley, G. M. Lang, M-S. Yang, and B. S. Miller. 2017. Quantifying food web interactions in the North Pacific – a data-based approach. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 100(4):443–470.
Sigler, M. F., and H. H. Zenger, Jr. 1989. Assessment of Gulf of Alaska Sablefish and other groundfish based on the domestic longline survey, 1987. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC Report 169.
von Szalay, P. G., and N. W. Raring. 2016. Data report: 2015 Gulf of Alaska bottom trawl survey. Seattle, WA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-325.
Species Distribution Modeling
Barnes, C. L., A. H. Beaudreau, M. E. Hunsicker, and L. Ciannelli (2018). Assessing the potential for competition between Pacific Halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomias) in the Gulf of Alaska. PLoS ONE 13(12):e0209402.
Hunsicker, M. E., L. Ciannelli, K. M. Bailey, S. Zador, and L. Stige. 2013. Climate and demography dictate the strength of predator-prey overlap in a subarctic marine ecosystem. PLoS ONE 8(6):e66025.
Shelton, A. O., M. E. Hunsicker, E. J. Ward, B. E. Feist, R. Blake, C. L. Ward, et al. 2017. Spatio-temporal models reveal subtle changes to demersal communities following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. ICES Journal of Marine Science doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsx079.
Bioenergetics
Armstrong JB and Schindler DE. 2011. Excess digestive capacity in predators reflects a life of feast and famine. Nature. 476:84–87.
Beaudreau, A. H., and T. E. Essington. 2009. Development of a new field-based approach for estimating consumption rates of fishes and comparison with a bioenergetics model for lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:565−578.
Harvey, C. J. 2009. Effects of temperature change on demersal fisheries in the California Current: a bioenergetics approach. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:1449–1461.
Holsman, K. K., and K. Aydin. 2015. Comparative methods for evaluating climate change impacts on the foraging ecology of Alaskan groundfish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 521:217–235.
Holsman, K. K., K. Aydin, J. Sullivan, T. Hurst, and G. Kruse. 2019. Climate effects and bottom-up controls on growth and size-at-age of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) in Alaska (USA). Fisheries Oceanography 28:345–358.
Miscellaneous
Brodziak, J. 2012. Fitting length-weight relationships with linear regression using the log-transformed allometric model with bias-correction. NOAA Technical Memorandum PIFSC-H-12-03.
Chipps, S. R., and J. E. Garvey. 2007. Assessment of diets and feeding patterns. In: Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. C. S. Guy and M. L. Brown, editors. Bethesda, MD. American Fisheries Society 473–514.
R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Interview with Charles A. Barnes
No full textInterview in six sessions, July and August 1987, with Charles A. Barnes, professor of physics, Caltech. He talks about his childhood and adolescence in Ontario, Canada; his early affinity for mathematics and science; undergraduate years at Canada’s McMaster University; wartime work in the British-Canadian atomic energy project at Chalk River, Montreal; and postwar PhD studies in physics at the University of Cambridge, working with O. Frisch and D. Wilkinson. The discussion of his 40-year career in Caltech's Kellogg Radiation Laboratory deals with many aspects of the lab’s history, personnel, and research contributions. Barnes talks about his nuclear physics collaborations with W. Fowler, T. Lauritsen, C. Lauritsen, and R. Christy. He gives a detailed account of his and Kellogg’s accelerator-based investigations into the nature of the weak nuclear interaction—a key focus of postwar work in quantum field theory and the development of grand unified theories—and describes research collaborations in this area with theorists M. Gell-Mann and R. P. Feynman. He talks about Kellogg’s social and scientific culture, the development of its accelerators and the chronology of its research, its groundbreaking investigations into stellar evolution and stellar nucleosynthesis, and the awarding of the 1983 Nobel Prize in physics to Fowler for his work in nucleosynthesis. Barnes describes his work with J. Bahcall on the solar neutrino flux and discusses the research contributions of K. Thorne, J. DuMond, F. Boehm, M. Schmidt, and G. J. Wasserburg, among others. The interview also covers Kellogg’s role in the physics and astrophysics community, both within and beyond Caltech, and the lab’s relationship with Caltech administration, including presidents and division chairs; Barnes’s work with students; and his views on current trends and future directions in physics and astrophysics
Corticosteroid inhibition of airway microvascular leakage.
No full textWe studied the effect of dexamethasone on microvascular leakage (using Evans blue dye as a marker of plasma exudation) induced in rat airways by platelet-activating factor (PAF). Intravenously administered PAF caused a dose-related increase in plasma leakage over the range 0.1 to 1 micrograms/kg. At 500 ng/kg PAF, the response was maximal in the extrapulmonary airways examined with increases in leakage above those in control animals of 312% in the larynx, 295% in the trachea, and 167% in the main bronchi. A maximal response was not achieved in the intrapulmonary airways at the doses of PAF tested: at 1 microgram/kg the increase was 206% above that in control animals. Dexamethasone, given by intraperitoneal injection 24 h and 4 h before PAF at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on each occasion, partially inhibited leakage induced by PAF (1 microgram/kg) in all airway levels studied by 43 to 65%. At each level the tissue concentration of dye was reduced to a value that was significantly (p less than 0.05) different from either PAF or control values. We also determined whether a high dose (8 mg/kg) of dexamethasone given intraperitoneally would inhibit plasma leakage of dye induced by either PAF or antigen-challenge of sensitized rats. When given 4 h before antigen, dexamethasone completely prevented allergen-induced leakage in the airways showing significant leakage (larynx, trachea, and intrapulmonary airways). Similarly, dexamethasone (4 h before) partially inhibited PAF-induced leakage in the trachea and main bronchi. In summary, in rat airways, both low and high doses of dexamethasone markedly inhibit mediator-induced plasma exudation
Interview with William Barnes by Stephen Brimm, July 30, 2001
No full textOral history interview with William William Sr. with comments by William Barnes Jr. Stephen Brimm was the interviewer.
William Barnes Sr. worked for the Federal Government from 1935 to 1940 before transferring to the Indiana Department of Conservation. He discusses his career with the federal government and with the state of Indiana, with his son chiming in at times. He also shares recollections of John Gottschalk, Harold Mosbaugh, John Rowle, H. P. Cottingham, J. Clark Salyer, Dan Jansen, Bull Madden, Dale Martin, Art Thigens, Bob Peck, Sam Jorgenson, Sam Parr.
Organization: FWS
Names: William Barnes, Sr, William Barnes, Jr.
Years: 1935-1940 (William Barnes, Sr.)
Program: Wildlife & Sport Fish Restoration
Keywords: History, Biography, Directors (USFWS), Employees (USFWS), Forestry, Forests, Dan Janzen, C.R. "Pink" Guttermith, J. Clark SalyerINTERVIEW WITH WILLIAM BARNES
BY STEPHEN BRIMM JULY 30, 2001
MR. BRIMM: This is Steve Brimm from the D. C. Booth Historic National Fish
Hatchery. I am in Huron, South Dakota at the State Fair and we are visiting tonight with
Bill Barnes, Sr., and his son, Bill Barnes, Jr. We are going to review a few moments from
Mr. Barnes’ past, his relationships with some of the Fish and Wildlife Services former
Directors, and some of our programs that he was involved with. Mr. Barnes, where
would you like to begin?
MR. BARNES, SR: I’ll begin with my recollections about John Gottschalk. I met John
in 1934. At that time was Camp Forester at a CCC Camp in southern Indiana. When I
met him he was giving a movie at a conservation club. This was my first association with
John. Later, between 1935 and 1940, I was employed by the Federal government under
the Resettlement Administration, the Farm Security Administration and the Soil
Conservation Service. I was located as a Project Forester, in charge of all forestry and
conservation work on a thirty thousand acre area in southern Indiana. At that time, it was
being developed by the Federal government for transfer to the Indiana Department of
Conservation, after it had been completed. My association with the employees during
the 1935-1940 period was involved with their interest in fish and wildlife on this
resettlement area. Many of them came down, and although it was being developed as a
State Forest, the Division of Fish and Game became quite interested in it. Many of them
came down for hunting, particularly for Quail at that time. John came down and spent a
day with me when we were hunting Bobwhite Quail. I didn’t really associate with him
much between that time and when I was in charge of the first Federal aid project in
Indiana. I was involved as the Project Leader of the Pittman-Roberson Project.
MR. BRIMM: What year was that?
MR. BARNES, SR: I was employed on July 1, 1940. At that time, John was still with
the Division of Fish and Game. The name of that organization was later changed to the
Division of Fish and Wildlife but it was known as the Division of Fish and Game at that
time. John was Superintendent of Fisheries. H. P. Cottingham was Superintendent of
Game and John Rowle was Superintendent of Game Wardens. Those were the three main
sections in the Division of Fish and Game at that time. They also had an education
section that visited conservation clubs. They showed movies and did a lot of work like
that. This is the way that John, evidently became associated with the Division. I believe
that his father was a prominent State Senator from northeaster Indiana. I can’t verify
this, but I believe that someone could. He was a Democratic Senator. Simmons, who was
the Director of the entire Division of Conservation, and Kunckle who was also in the
picture as Director of the Division of Fish and Game were all from that section of
northeastern Indiana. I assume that this probably made preparations for John’s
association, because everything at that time was political. Any time that politics changed
there was an entire turn over of everyone, except for me and our men in the Federal Aid
program. At that time we were protected by the Hatch Act. They assumed that if they
tried to do something with our entire group, their Federal aide funds might be canceled for
the State. I staid on during the war. I was born in 1908 and I was in my thirties at that
time. We were still planning on having the area transferred to the Indiana Division of
Forestry as a State Forest. But when we started to get involved in World War II, why
things changed quite a bit. It must have been in the late 1940s or in early 1941, John left
the Division and he went to Indiana University to pursue some graduate work under Dr.
William Ricker who was in charge of the Indiana Lake and Stream Survey. After the war,
John accepted a position with Seagram’s Distillery in Lawrenceburg, Indiana. At that
time, they were working on Penicillin, and John staid there. I know that I have forgotten
some parts of the story. I think that John got his Bachelor’s degree from Irwin College in
Richmond, Indiana. It was a Quaker college. I do not know his religion. But I believe
that is where he got his Bachelor’s degree before he came. And he had evidently had just
graduated ahead of this time when I first saw him showing movies. The picture that I
have shown you represents some of the history of the old Division of Fish and Game.
The Division was under the Democratic regime for sixteen years and at the end of twelve
year, Simmons and Kunckle backed the wrong fellow in the Primary. They felt that
Governor Schrecker, who was also a Democrat, would want them to resign. But he
didn’t. I talked to his Secretary and he told me that Schrecker would have been glad for
them to have remained. The two of them resigned. During that period, “Pink”
Guttermith [sic] who is shown in this picture had been in charge of the educational
section. He took over as the new Director of the Division of Fish and Game. Then he
accepted a position with the Wildlife Management Institute as Vice President under Ira
Gabrielson. [Showing a photograph] He is in this picture after having taken that position,
and John is in the picture long after he had left. The reason they are in the picture is at
the end of the sixteen years the Republican Party took over for four years. There was a
complete change of everyone except for, as I said, the Pittman-Roberson personnel. Then
at the end of that period, between 1946 and 1950, Schrecker came back, after a lapse of
one four year period as Governor for the second time. When he came back, why all of
these people were reunited. John happened to be at the North American Wildlife
Conference in Milwaukee, along with Simmons who was the former Director of the
Division of Conservation. Cottingham then took over as the Director of Fish and Game,
and Kunckle took over as the Director of Fish and Game after this lapse of four years.
What happened was that they all got together, and at this time, this picture was taken.
At this time, John had been with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service for several years. I
assume this picture was taken about 1950 or 1951. The whole bunch kind of got
together, and of course, Cottingham and Kunckle were back in. After Pink Guttermith
accepted the Vice Presidency of the Wildlife Management Institute Harold Mosbaugh
who is also in this picture, became the Director of the Division of Fish and Game. At
that time the central office of the U. S. Fish Wildlife Service of the Department of the
Interior was in the Merchandise-Mark building in Chicago. We went to Chicago and
inquired about employment with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. John submitted his
application. I submitted my application, as did Hank Cottingham and Harold Mosbaugh.
My wife didn’t want me to leave Indiana and so after my application had been approved
and I had been told to report for an assignment on the Missouri River Basin Survey, I
resigned and Cottingham resigned. Gottschalk and Mosbaugh went with the Fish and
Wildlife Service. I had received instructions to report to a location in Wyoming with John
Gottschalk. I didn’t report and then John went from there. I suppose politics also
entered in to the Federal program too. John, I think, took over the Dingo-Johnson
program. Did he go over this with you?
MR. BRIMM: It rings a bell.
MR. BARNES, SR: Of course, Pink Guttermith, or C. R. Guttermith, we called him
“Pink” with the Wildlife Management Institute, he and John were quite influential in
Washington. I don’t know when John served as the Director. I do remember a time,
when he was Director, that he was interested in getting some kind a project in Indiana,
because there was no National Wildlife Refuge in Indiana at that time. He came down and
I flew with him in a plane over part of southern Indiana looking for a prospective area for
National Wildlife Refuge. He had wanted to at least do something for Indiana. I believe
he did establish some kind a Fisheries Research Station or something in some location in
southern Indiana. I never heard what happened to it. I don’t know whether it just
disappeared or what happened to it. Indiana did not get at National Wildlife Refuge until
months later than that. In fact, Charlie Sheffield who was with the Regional office in
Minneapolis kind of ramrodded a Wildlife Refuge in a part of Indiana that I didn’t think
was even worth making a Refuge out of, if you want to know the truth.
MR. BARNES, JR: He was the first Manager.
MR. BARNES, SR: This shows that a lot of times how things can be established. And
now, they have another Wildlife Refuge down in part of the area that flew over with John
on the Patoka River. Another thing that I remember is that back in the 1940s we were
trying to actually get a Wildlife Refuge in the Kankakee region of northwestern Indiana.
At one time, that area contained over a half million acres of marsh that was real important
for ducks and geese and other wildlife in Indiana. This was while Guttermith was still in
there, and I think that maybe it was while Kunckle was still in there. This was in the
early 1940s. We met with J. Clark Salyer in Kentland, Indiana, which is in that region. I
believe that he had one of his engineers by the name of Taylor in on it. We looked over
this area and Salyer said, “What would this cost, per acre”? I told him that I thought it
would cost about 50.00 an acre. And now it contains way over eight thousand acres, I think. It
just shows up that at that time, land could have been purchased, but now it is gone. I
don’t look for them to really have any Refuges of much size whatsoever in the Kankakee
region. At the present time the counties north of the Kankakee River are being considered
by different agencies. What are your different agencies now? There is the North
American… I don’t remember all of the difference agencies, but evidently they are all
contributing. And since that time of course the Indiana Lake Shore has been purchased
and I think that was is going to happen it that they will be able to add some areas to the
lake shore and places like that. I don’t see how they, at the present time, would ever end
up in taking up all of that valuable agricultural land. This is my only feeling about it.
My association with the Fish and Wildlife Service goes back to the time when I took over
the Federal Aide projects. I coordinated those projects for years. And since that time,
there has been just one other person who just retired. I was Coordinator of all Federal
Aide projects, Pittman-Roberson and Dingo-Johnson for quite a few years. My
association primarily with the Fish and Wildlife Service has been with the Federal Aide
Projects. My title was Federal Aide Coordinator. We have had a lot of different meetings
with various people who at the time were from the Regional office in Minneapolis,
instead of Denver. At the Regional office, when Bob Burwell was in there they always
had a Federal Aide Inspector who coordinated the work in the region. That was my
association with them. I had some pictures, and I am sure that the Regional office
probably has the same ones. Every year we would meet in a different State of the region.
At the time, North and South Dakota were in the Region and that has all been changed.
The Regional Office would have some of the Federal Aide coordination meetings that we
had, and if they want any pictures of those, I have one. I know that they also have one of
our meeting in Illinois. I have another one of our meeting in North Dakota. It was on a
Sharptail hunt that we had up there. I have that, and I think that they also have it. My
association was with them. I can tell you that during the time when I first came on in the
1940s there was a fellow by the name of Vernon Morrick who I think was the Regional
Director. I don’t even know what his background or education was. Dan Jansen came in
as the Director out of Minneapolis. Everyone had a high degree of respect for Dan
Jansen. I know that Knuckle and all of us really liked him. I remember one time when we
met in Minneapolis he actually has some of us around to his home. Later, after he came
to Washington I met him, and some of the other fellows that were associated with him
then. At that time they were talking about endangered species for the first time that I had
heard about. I did meet Al Day, but I don’t much about Al other than that after he had
retired, he came to Indiana and was researching information for a book. Are you familiar
with the book that he wrote?
MR. BARNES, JR: I can’t remember.
MR. BARNES, SR: Well, anyway he was researching that and I gave him some
information that he used in his book for Indiana. That was my association with Al.
Otherwise, I didn’t have too much association with him. I can’t remember too much
about the rest of it. Other than of course the fact that Bill [his son] started in North
Dakota under Bull Madden. Did you know Bull?
MR. BRIMM: No, I wasn’t around him.
MR. BARNES, JR: He was a good boss.
MR. BARNES, SR: Bull had a brother who remained in Indiana in Fish and Wildlife by
the name of Bill Madden. Bull went with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull was
Bill’s younger brother. [Addressing his son] You know all about Bull.
MR. BARNES, JR: Yeah. I was thinking too Dad, that you had a chapter in that book
on water fowling on the Mississippi. You each had a chapter to write and I know that
you wrote one on Indiana about back in the market hunting days. That is interesting. I
know that you have got that book. Who decided to do that?
MR. BARNES, SR: Eugene Connate, and the publishing company in New York City
decided it.
MR. BARNES, JR: It wasn’t something that the Fish and Wildlife Service instituted? I
thought that maybe it was.
MR. BARNES, SR: He called it Wild Flying in the Mississippi Flyway instead of “Water
fowling” in the Mississippi Flyway. He has each State give a resume of wild fowl and
they included Ducks and Geese and Rails and Gallinules and everything else. I know that
you interviewed some of those old market hunters.
MR. BARNES, SR: Right. Yes, I did. Practically all of my association was with the
Regional office in Minneapolis. One of our men, who left us, was Dale Martin. Did you
ever hear of Dale Martin? He was a Federal Aide Inspector for the Region. He was in
Minneapolis. And a fellow by the name of John Langenbach was another Federal Aide
Inspector. There were several of them that would always come to each State and check on
what you were doing. They also had an auditor from the Regional office who came and
audited our Federal Aide expenditures. His name was Art Thigens. He was an Auditor
out of Minneapolis for years and years. Anyway, my association has been with all of
those fellows.
As I said earlier, John and I were to report to Wyoming, and Mosbaugh reported to
Billings, Montana. He acted as a liaison officer between with all of the States involved
with the Missouri River Basin. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service employed him. I
imagine that if they wanted to write histories about all of this, why, they’re going to have
an awful big book! I mean, if they are going to cover all of the regions in the United States
that’s got to be a task for somebody!
MR. BRIMM: We’ve got a Historian back there at NCTC that wants to do that. And
the more stories that he can get from the people that were involved with the Fish and
Wildlife Service, he figures that there is more flavor that he can put in that book and it will
be more accurate. It will probably give stories that aren’t written down anywhere yet.
MR. BARNES, SR. That’s right. Well up until our old department was taken out of
politics, why, the whole thing was political. It became the Department of Natural
Resources, and that was in 1965. After that the thing was stabilized, but before that,
whenever the politics changed in Indiana the whole personnel changed, as I said, with the
exception of our Federal Aide group. So you can see that I never had a very good taste in
my mouth for politicians! I just couldn’t understand how they could be involved. But I
suppose that the Fish and Wildlife Service has had the same deals. I don’t know. You
fellows know more about that.
MR. BARNES, JR: I never noticed it since I started. But maybe it was before that.
MR. BRIMM: Maybe in the early years it was all enclosed, just like the States were.
MR. BARNES, SR. That’s right. I know that your Directors have changed.
MR. BRIMM: Oh yeah. They generally change with the turn over of administrations.
It didn’t filter all the way down.
MR. BARNES, SR. With us, if soaked all the way down to the Federal Aide projects.
MR. BRIMM: Did you ever know what happened to that Mr. Mosbaugh?
MR. BARNES, SR: He died.
MR. BRIMM: I mean, after he went to Billings. Did he stay in Billings?
MR. BARNES, SR. Oh yes. He served out the rest of his time, until he retired there.
His widow is still living in Billings. Her name is Margaret. In fact, I send her a Christmas
card every year. Harold of course, was the Director in the Division of Fish and Game at
the time when he accepted this position with the River Basin Survey. He was Indiana
Director at that time. Wasn’t there a Peck-Sloan? Bob Peck was in charge of the Army
Corp of Engineers, and Sloan was on the State side, I think. I think that maybe Harold
took the position that Sloan had had.
MR. BARNES, JR: Was that before the main stem Missouri dams were built?
MR. BARNES, SR: Oh yeah. In fact, that was when John and I were supposed to be
working on River Basin projects, when I was told to go to Wyoming. That’s were John
started.
As far as my career is concerned, why, I got a Bachelor’s degree in Forestry. That was
three years in Pennsylvania. I think it was the second oldest forest school in the United
States. It is now part of Penn State University. It is call Mont Alto. It went through the
same politics too. Of course Penn State was much stronger than our Forestry School. In
fact the school that I went to taught nothing but Forestry. They were primarily educating
us to be district foresters or foresters for the State of Pennsylvania. Well, Penn State
started their Forestry School after that. They had a lot of greater power, so my third year
at Mont Alto they decided that there was going to one school teaching Forestry in
Pennsylvania. That was Penn State, and our school was transferred to Penn State. A lot
of us didn’t like that, so my last year, I went down to North Carolina State, along with
most of us. That’s the reason I graduated from North Carolina State. Otherwise, why, I
would have graduated from good old Pennsylvania Forestry School.
MR. BRIMM: How long were you associated with the CCC program?
MR. BARNES, SR: I was only associated with the CCC from June 1933 until October 1,
1935. I came to Indiana from Florida. I worked for the Florida Forest Service from 1930
until 1933 and at that time, why, some of the people who had attended Mont Alto; Ralph
Wilcox was State Forester, he went to Mont Alto. And Joe Taylor, his assistant went to
Mont Alto also. As soon as the CCC started, they got in touch with a lot of the
graduates of Mont Alto and got them to come to Indiana as Camp Foresters on individual
projects. For example, we started in on private soil erosion control, before the Soil
Conservation Service was even formed. That’s how the Soil Conservation Service got
started. It was just within a few months that Hugh Bennett got the Soil Conservation
Service started.
MR. BRIMM: Your project was in southern Indiana? Your camp?
MR. BARNES, SR: Yes. Later, before I came this five-year employment with the
Federal government why, then we transferred to any area that had been given to Wilcox.
The county next to us near Ferdinand, I transferred down there and that became
Ferdinand State Forest. Then I left there. Wilcox had me go to northern Indiana on a new
CCC Camp. Part of the project there was establishing a nursery. I left that project and
came to Martin County.
Susceptibility of raspberry cultivars to the raspberry cane midge (Resseliella theobaldi BARNES)
No full textDuring the 2004 growing season, five raspberry cultivars were evaluated in terms
of their susceptibility to the raspberry cane midge (Resseliella theobaldi Barnes). The
trial was carried out at Berkenye, Nógrád County, Hungary. The cultivars evaluated
were ‘Rubaca’ from Germany, ‘Fertődi Zamatos’ from Hungary, ‘Tulameen’ from
Canada, and ‘Autumn Bliss’ and ‘Golden Bliss’ from the United Kingdom. Every
other week, twenty-five split primocanes of each cultivar were randomly collected for
laboratory examination. Data recorded for each cultivar included the mean number of
larvae, the mean split length, and the mean extent of bark peeling per primocane.
Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients were calculated for the correlations between
the annual mean number of larvae per primocane on the one hand, and the annual
cumulative mean split length per primocane and annual mean extent of bark peeling
per primocane on the other hand. There was a weak correlation between annual mean
number of larvae and annual cumulative mean split length, and a stronger correlation
between annual mean number of larvae and annual mean extent of bark peeling.
Annual mean number of larvae per primocane and annual mean extent of bark peeling
per primocane were both highest in ‘Rubaca’, which means that the number of larvae
per cane largely depends on the extent of stem peeling, although longitudinal splitting
may also play a role. Therefore, cultivars with hardly any bark peeling and few and
small longitudinal splits can be presumed to be less susceptible to infestation by the
raspberry cane midge. Using these criteria, the least susceptible of the five cultivars
evaluated would be ‘Tulameen’ and ‘Fertődi Zamatos’. Further research is needed to
confirm this conclusion and to gather data on other factors which affect cultivar
choice for new plantations, including winter hardiness, and susceptibility to cane
diseases
- …
