1,720,998 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    Abstract 224: Critical variables for automated protein immunodetection using western blot

    No full text
    Abstract Reliable immunodetection of proteins is a critical step in the discovery of novel biomarkers. It is often performed manually. The immunodetection protocol consists of multiple steps including blocking of nonspecific binding sites, incubation using primary and secondary antibodies and extensive washing between steps that easily introduce bias and errors. The quality of results depends on multiple subjective and objective factors such as the qualification and technical skills of the personnel performing the assay and the accuracy of temporal and temperature control, especially during the immunodetection step. BlotCycler™, automated western blot processor, use fluidic control system that allows to eliminate the variability associated with immunodetection and to achieve higher sensitivity by optimized washing procedure. We used BlotCycler to analyze critical variables for immunodetection including temperature, incubation time and reagent mixing. Relatively small changes in duration and temperature of incubation significantly affect not only the intensity of signal but also the specificity of antibody interaction with antigen. Automated immunodetection at 4ºC significantly improve the specificity of detection and sensitivity that allows reproducible detection of low expressing proteins. Automated processing using BlotCycler allows optimization and control of critical variables leading to improved reproducibility and specificity of immunodetection and should be routinely used for biomarker candidate discovery and confirmation, reliable protein quantification, primary antibody specificity testing, and optimization of primary and secondary antibodies concentrations. Citation Format: Alexander Margulis, David P. Chimento, Russ Yukhananov. Critical variables for automated protein immunodetection using western blot [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 224. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-224</jats:p
    corecore