1,721,190 research outputs found
T. P. Wiseman, Unwritten Rome. Exeter, University Press, 2008
No full textPoucet Jacques. T. P. Wiseman, Unwritten Rome. Exeter, University Press, 2008. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 79, 2010. pp. 644-647
T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and his World. A Reappraisal
No full textTordeur Pol. T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and his World. A Reappraisal. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 58, 1989. p. 314
T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and His World. A Reappraisal
No full textTordeur Pol. T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and His World. A Reappraisal. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 56, 1987. pp. 365-366
T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and His World. A Reappraisal
No full textTordeur Pol. T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and His World. A Reappraisal. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 56, 1987. pp. 365-366
T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and his World. A Reappraisal
No full textTordeur Pol. T. P. Wiseman, Catullus and his World. A Reappraisal. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 58, 1989. p. 314
T. P. Wiseman, Cinna the Poet and other Roman Essays
No full textLiénard Edmond. T. P. Wiseman, Cinna the Poet and other Roman Essays. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 44, fasc. 2, 1975. pp. 735-736
T. P. Wiseman, New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 B.C.-A.D. 14
No full textRaepsaet-Charlier Marie-Thérèse. T. P. Wiseman, New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 B.C.-A.D. 14. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 41, fasc. 1, 1972. pp. 397-398
T. P. WISEMAN (Ed.), Classics in Progress. Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome.
No full textSomville Pierre. T. P. WISEMAN (Ed.), Classics in Progress. Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome.. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 74, 2005. pp. 686-687
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
