1,720,990 research outputs found
(Table 1) Noble gas elemental abundance of pillow lava in DSDP sites
(Table 1) Noble gas elemental abundance of pillow lava in DSDP site
(Table 2a) Isotopic composition of He, Ne, Ar and Kr of pillow lava in DSDP sites
(Table 2a) Isotopic composition of He, Ne, Ar and Kr of pillow lava in DSDP site
(Table 2a) Isotopic composition of He, Ne, Ar and Kr of pillow lava from CYAMEX samples
(Table 2a) Isotopic composition of He, Ne, Ar and Kr of pillow lava from CYAMEX sample
(Table 1) Noble gas elemental abundance of pillow lava from CYAMEX samples
(Table 1) Noble gas elemental abundance of pillow lava from CYAMEX sample
(Table 2b) Isotopic composition of Xe of pillow lava in DSDP sites
(Table 2b) Isotopic composition of Xe of pillow lava in DSDP site
(Table 2b) Isotopic composition of Xe of pillow lava from CYAMEX samples
(Table 2b) Isotopic composition of Xe of pillow lava from CYAMEX sample
(Table 1) Step-heating degassing data for argon-39 in volcanic rock from DSDP Hole 58-446A
(Table 1) Step-heating degassing data for argon-39 in volcanic rock from DSDP Hole 58-446
(Table 1) Step-heating degassing data for argon-39 in volcanic rock from DSDP Hole 60-458
(Table 1) Step-heating degassing data for argon-39 in volcanic rock from DSDP Hole 60-45
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
