1,721,017 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Understanding Language Models: Optimization, Architecture, and Emergent Abilities

    No full text
    The remarkable success of large language models (LLMs) has led to significant advances across a wide range of tasks. However, their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, largely due to the complexity of their architectures (e.g., Transformers, Mamba) and the intricate ways in which predictions depend on data relationships. This thesis aims to uncover the fundamental principles behind the effectiveness of LLMs. A central focus of this work is the optimization behavior of attention mechanisms, the core computational component of Transformer architectures. Unlike traditional neural networks, attention allows models to capture rich dependencies across sequences through token-to-token interactions. This thesis investigates the underlying mechanism of attention by analyzing its optimization dynamics. We show that optimized attention behaves similarly to a Support Vector Machine (SVM), effectively separating important tokens from less relevant ones using linear constraints on token-pair outer products. These selected tokens contribute most significantly to model performance. We further extend this analysis to next-token prediction, where we theoretically prove that a similar implicit bias holds. While softmax attention has demonstrated strong empirical performance, its quadratic time and memory complexity limits its efficiency. To address this, recent architectures such as linear attention, state-space models, and gated linear attention have been proposed, achieving near-linear complexity per token via recurrent formulations. In addition to analyzing softmax attention, this thesis studies the optimization landscapes of these efficient alternatives in the context of in-context learning (ICL). We show that they implicitly perform variants of gradient descent over the in-context demonstrations, treating them as training data. We also investigate the role of model depth in leveraging unlabeled data. Our analysis reveals that while single-layer architectures fail to benefit from unlabeled in-context examples, multi-layer attention models can effectively exploit them, highlighting the importance of depth in semi-supervised in-context learning. Beyond architectural differences, this thesis explores optimization behavior across diverse problem settings, including retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), LoRA adaptation, and multitask prompting, providing insights that align more closely with real-world applications. Finally, we examine the emergent abilities of LLMs through both theoretical and empirical lenses. We formalize ICL as an algorithm learning problem, where the sequence model implicitly constructs a hypothesis function from the input prompt at inference time. We show numerically that sufficiently large, well-pretrained models can implement near-optimal algorithms. We also investigate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, where models decompose complex tasks into simpler subproblems. We propose a two-stage interpretation of CoT: first, filtering and grouping relevant reasoning steps; second, performing in-context learning over each group. This framework explains the benefits of CoT reasoning in enhancing model expressivity and reducing in-context sample complexity. Overall, this thesis aims to uncover the foundations of LLM effectiveness through the lens of optimization behavior, model architecture, and emergent capabilities.PhDElectrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studie

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore