1,720,985 research outputs found
Open Peer Reviewers in Africa Workshop Module I Template Slides
This template slide deck, available both in .pdf and .pptx format, was developed in the context of a Wellcome Trust funded project to pilot a three-part workshop series called Open Peer Reviewers in Africa. This deck is the first of two—Module II template slide deck available here. Details about the workshop and information about how to run your own version of the workshop can be found in the Trainer Guide.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
All contributing authors in alphabetical order:
Alsop, Shane; Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Havemann, Johanna; Korzec, Kornelia; Munene, Aurelia; Namoune, Rachida; Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy; Saderi, Daniela; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Contributions were made as follows:
Conceptualization: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Data curation: n/a
Formal Analysis: n/a
Funding acquisition: Saderi, Daniela
Investigation: n/a
Methodology: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Project administration: Alsop, Shane; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Korzec, Kornelia; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns
Resources: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Software: n/a
Supervision: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Ngugi; Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy
Translations: Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Namoune, Rachida; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Validation: Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen, Outa, Nicholas
Visualization: n/a
Writing – original draft (training materials and project report): Saderi, Daniela
Writing – review & editing: Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Jo
Modèle de diapositives du Module I de l'Atelier ouvert destiné aux pairs évaluateurs pour l'Afrique
Ce modèle de diapositive, disponible en format .pdf et .pptx, a été développé dans le contexte d’un projet financé par le Wellcome Trust et vise à piloter une série d’ateliers en trois parties intitulée Atelier ouvert aux pairs évaluateurs pour l’Afrique. Ce modèle est le premier des deux diapositives du module II à notre disposition. Vous trouverez des détails sur l’atelier et des informations relatives sur la façon de gérer votre propre version de l’atelier dans le Guide du formateur.
Divulgation : ces traductions ont été effectuées par Roseline Dzekem Dine.
Ce contenu constitue un modèle. Il est destiné à être adapté au public et à la culture, tous les exemples utilisés peuvent ne pas être pertinents ou appropriés.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
All contributing authors in alphabetical order:
Alsop, Shane; Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Havemann, Johanna; Korzec, Kornelia; Munene, Aurelia; Namoune, Rachida; Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy; Saderi, Daniela; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Contributions were made as follows:
Conceptualization: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Data curation: n/a
Formal Analysis: n/a
Funding acquisition: Saderi, Daniela
Investigation: n/a
Methodology: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Project administration: Alsop, Shane; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Korzec, Kornelia; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns
Resources: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Software: n/a
Supervision: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Ngugi; Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy
Translations: Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Namoune, Rachida; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Validation: Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen, Outa, Nicholas
Visualization: n/a
Writing – original draft (training materials and project report): Saderi, Daniela
Writing – review & editing: Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Jo
شرائح المراجعين المفتوحة في إفريقيا للوحدة التدريبية الأولى
تم تطوير مجموعة شرائح القوالب هذه، المتوفرة بتنسيق pdf و pptx ، في سياق مشروع ممول من Wellcome Trust لتجربة سلسلة من ورش العمل المكونة من ثلاثة أجزاء تسمى Open Peer Reviewers in Africa. هذه المجموعة هي الأولى من مجموعتين - مجموعة شرائح قالب الوحدة الثانية المتاحة هنا. يمكن العثور على تفاصيل حول ورشة العمل ومعلومات حول كيفية تشغيل نسختك الخاصة من ورشة العمل في دليل المدرب. (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7509683)
بيان الإفصاح عن المعلومات
الإفصاح:
هذا المحتوى عبارة عن نموذج ويهدف إلى تكييفه مع الجمهور والثقافة ، وقد لا تكون جميع الأمثلة المستخدمة ذات صلة أو
مناسبة.
----
This template slide deck, available both in .pdf and .pptx format, was developed in the context of a Wellcome Trust-funded project to pilot a three-part workshop series called Open Peer Reviewers in Africa. This deck is the first of two—Module II template slide deck available here. Details about the workshop and information about how to run your own version of the workshop can be found in the Trainer Guide.
Disclosure Statement
Disclosure: This content is a template and is meant to be adapted to the audience and culture, not all examples used may be relevant or appropriate.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
All contributing authors in alphabetical order:
Alsop, Shane; Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Havemann, Johanna; Korzec, Kornelia; Munene, Aurelia; Namoune, Rachida; Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy; Saderi, Daniela; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Contributions were made as follows:
Conceptualization: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Data curation: n/a
Formal Analysis: n/a
Funding acquisition: Saderi, Daniela
Investigation: n/a
Methodology: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Project administration: Alsop, Shane; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Korzec, Kornelia; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns
Resources: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Software: n/a
Supervision: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Ngugi; Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy
Translations: Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Namoune, Rachida; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Validation: Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen, Outa, Nicholas
Visualization: n/
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Open Peer Reviewers in Africa Workshop Module II Template Slides
This template slide deck, available both in .pdf and .pptx format, was developed in the context of a Wellcome Trust funded project to pilot a three-part workshop series called Open Peer Reviewers in Africa. This deck is the second of two—Module I template slide deck available here. Details about the workshop and information about how to run your own version of the workshop can be found in the Trainer Guide.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
All contributing authors in alphabetical order:
Alsop, Shane; Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Havemann, Johanna; Korzec, Kornelia; Munene, Aurelia; Namoune, Rachida; Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy; Saderi, Daniela; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Contributions were made as follows:
Conceptualization: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Data curation: n/a
Formal Analysis: n/a
Funding acquisition: Saderi, Daniela
Investigation: n/a
Methodology: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Project administration: Alsop, Shane; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Korzec, Kornelia; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns
Resources: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Software: n/a
Supervision: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Ngugi; Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy
Translations: Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Namoune, Rachida; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Validation: Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen, Outa, Nicholas
Visualization: n/a
Writing – original draft (training materials and project report): Saderi, Daniela
Writing – review & editing: Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Jo
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
