1,720,973 research outputs found
The Newark Basin, the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, and the Triassic-Jurassic Boundary. Field Trip for the 8th Annual DOSECC Workshop on Continental Scientific Drilling, May 22-25, 2004. Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey
Lacustrine cyclicity and the Triassic-Jurassic transition. Geological Society of America, Field Guide for the 2006 Meeting
The Triassic-Jurassic faunal and floral transition in the Fundy Basin, Nova Scotia (Field Trip A7: The Triassic-Jurassic faunal and floral transition in the Fundy Basin, Nova Scotia. Geological Association of Canada, Mineralogical Association of Canada, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Canadian Society of Soil Sciences, 2005 Joint Meeting, Halifax, NS)
Triassic-Jurassic faunal and floral transition in the Fundy Basin, Nova Scotia. North American Paleontological Congress Field Guidebook
Causes and consequences of the Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction as seen from the Hartford basin
Flame extinguished! End-triassic mass extinction polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons reflect more than just fire
Global warming induced-wildfires of the 21st century reveal the catastrophic effects that widespread biomass burning has on flora and fauna. During mass extinction events, similar wildfire episodes are considered to play an important role in driving perturbations in terrestrial ecosystems. To better evaluate the record of biomass burning and potential carbon cycle feedbacks at the end-Triassic mass extinction (~202 Ma; ETE), we investigated the relative abundances of a range of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the 13C values of regular isoprenoids and n-alkanes at key sections in the SW UK. These data reveal little evidence for intensive wildfire activity during the extinction event, in contrast to what has been reported further afield in European, Chinese, and Greenland ETE sections. Herein, PAHs instead reflect greater contributions from an episode of soil erosion that we attribute to Large Igneous Province (LIP)-driven acid rain, and possible distal sources of smoke, suggestive of fire elsewhere in the UK/European basins. This terrestrial ecosystem perturbation is coincident with those in the marine realm, indicating ecosystem perturbations occurred across multiple habitats throughout the latest Rhaetian in the SW UK. Additionally, this geochemical approach reveals that the precursor carbon isotope excursion (CIE) routinely used in chemostratigraphic correlations is unrelated to LIP activity, but instead results from the increased input of terrestrially derived 13C-depleted plant material. Furthermore, we find the initial CIE (commonly used to mark the extinction level, but which is now known to precede the ETE) is also unrelated to biomass burning. Collectively, these data reveal that processes other than combustion of terrestrial material are important for the terrestrial phase of the ETE in the SW UK. Similar investigations are required on other ETE sections, both those in close proximity to the LIP driving the extinction and those further afield, to more clearly determine the negative effect(s) of LIPs and their geographic extent in the terrestrial realm
Flame out! End-Triassic mass extinction polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons reflect more than just fire
Global warming induced-wildfires of the 21st century reveal the catastrophic effects that widespread biomass burning has on flora and fauna. During mass extinction events, similar wildfire episodes are considered to play an important role in driving perturbations in terrestrial ecosystems. To better evaluate the record of biomass burning and potential carbon cycle feedbacks at the end-Triassic mass extinction (∼202 Ma; ETE), we investigated the relative abundances of a range of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the δ 13C values of regular isoprenoids and n-alkanes at key sections in the SW UK. These data reveal little evidence for intensive wildfire activity during the extinction event, in contrast to what has been reported elsewhere in European, Chinese, and Greenland ETE sections. Herein, PAHs instead reflect greater contributions from an episode of soil erosion that we attribute to Large Igneous Province (LIP)-driven acid rain, and possible distal sources of smoke, suggestive of fire elsewhere in the UK/European basins. This terrestrial ecosystem perturbation is coincident with those in the marine realm, indicating ecosystem perturbations occurred across multiple habitats throughout the latest Rhaetian in the SW UK. Additionally, this geochemical approach reveals that the precursor carbon isotope excursion (CIE) routinely used in chemostratigraphic correlations is unrelated to LIP activity, but instead results from the increased input of terrestrially derived 13C-depleted plant material. Furthermore, we find the initial CIE (commonly used to mark the extinction level, but which is now known to precede the ETE) is also unrelated to biomass burning. Collectively, these data reveal that processes other than combustion of terrestrial material are important for the terrestrial phase of the ETE in the SW UK. Similar investigations are required on other ETE sections, both those in close proximity to the LIP driving the extinction and those further afield, to more clearly determine the negative effect(s) of LIPs and their geographic extent in the terrestrial realm
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
