1,720,962 research outputs found
Green and social process patterns for sustainable businesses: lessons learned from Italian Benefit Corporations
Full text linkIn the last decades the attention of citizens and companies on sustainability issues has increasingly grown. Today companies are asked to consider economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability to operate in ways that secure long-term economic performance by avoiding detrimental social and environmental behaviour.
Such a growing attention towards sustainability has led to the introduction of new methods, approaches, and organizational models to consider sustainability within business. As to methods and approaches, in the present work, those offered by Sustainable Business Process Management are examined. As to the new organizational models, the attention is focused on Benefit Corporations.
Sustainable Business Process Management (S-BPM) – the managerial discipline that provides organizations with methods, approaches, and techniques to embed sustainability in the management of business processes – has recently emerged as a research stream of Business Process Management. In addition to traditional performance (i.e. time, quality, cost, and flexibility), in the case of S-BPM, the environmental and social performance are considered to properly manage business processes along their entire life cycle.
Benefit Corporations – innovative hybrid form of businesses that purse both profits and common benefit objectives – have also been established to mitigate negative externalities attributed to the enterprises’ narrow focus on profit maximization that has characterized the capitalism model. Such a model has generated prosperity and improved the quality of life, but not without undesirable, in many cases harmful, social and environmental consequences.
The dissertation aims to identify sustainable (green and social) process patterns that companies may adopt to undertake a sustainable transformation of their business processes. A sustainable process pattern provides reusable and practice-based solutions to environmentally and socially analyse, design and redesign a business process. By adopting the theoretical lens of process theory and a pragmatist qualitative research design, a qualitative content analysis of Benefit Corporations’ sustainability reporting documents has been conducted to systematically and objectively identify sustainable practices that Benefit Corporations implement to achieve their sustainability goals. Such sustainable practices have constituted the practical basis for the derivation of a set of thirty sustainable process patterns.
The dissertation has theoretical and practical implications. By analysing sustainable practices adopted by Benefit Corporations to achieve sustainability goals, it contributes to advance academic knowledge on Benefit Corporations and address some literature gaps. By providing a set of sustainable process patterns, it contributes to advance academic knowledge in the field of Sustainable Business Process Management. As to practical implications, the dissertation provides a handbook of sustainable practices (in the form of sustainable process patterns) that companies and process analysts may adopt to analyse, design, and redesign business processes, and make them more environmentally and socially sustainable
Digital Transformation Models for the I4.0 Transition: Lessons from the Change Management Literature
Full text linkThe growing diffusion of digital technologies, especially in production systems, is leading to a new industrial paradigm, named Industry 4.0 (I4.0), which involves disruptive changes in the way companies organize production and create value. Organizations willing to seize the opportunities of I4.0 must thus innovate their processes and business models. The challenges that companies must face for the transition towards I4.0 paradigm are not trivial. Several digital transformation models and roadmaps have been lately proposed in the literature to support companies in such a transition. The literature on change management stresses that about 70% of change initiatives—independently of the aim—fail to achieve their goals due to the implementation of transformation programs that are affected by well-known mistakes or neglect some relevant aspects, such as lack of management support, lack of clearly defined and achievable objectives and poor communication. This paper investigates whether and to what extent the existing digital transformation models (DTMs) and roadmaps for I4.0 transition consider the lessons learnt in the field of change management. To this aim, a Systematic Literature Review to identify existing models and roadmaps is carried out. The results obtained by the review are discussed under the lens of the change-management literature. Based on that, the shortcomings and weaknesses of existing DTMs are pinpointed. Extant DTMs mainly focus on digital transformation initiatives carried out in manufacturing companies; they do not cover all the phases of the digital transformation process but rather focus on the definition of the I4.0 vision, strategy and roadmap. Little attention is devoted to the implementation and consolidation of digital change. Change management lessons are considered to a limited extent, based on which, some suggestions for better dealing with digital transformation initiatives are discussed. The paper contributes to advancing knowledge on models and approaches to support organizations in managing digital transformation. The identification of change management activities that a digital transformation initiative should involve as well as the suggestions on how to effectively deal with it can be used by managers to successfully lead the I4.0 transition journey in their organizations
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dysphagia in Huntington's disease: Correlation with clinical features
No full textHuntington's disease (HD) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterised by motor impairment, cognitive decline and psychiatric disorders. Dysphagia is a pathologic condition that increases morbidity and mortality of the affected people. Our aim was to evaluate dysphagia in a group of HD patients in view of motor, cognitive and functional decline. Thirty-seven genetically confirmed HD patients were submitted to clinical evaluations of swallowing. Bedside Swallowing Assessment Scale (BSAS) was used. Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) was applied for a preliminary classification of swallowing difficulties. All patients were also evaluated by the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS). A group of 39 controls comparable for sex and age were recruited for BSAS scores normalisation. The BSAS scores indicated that in our HD cohort, 32.4% presented relevant or severe dysphagia. The DOSS levels were significantly correlated with main clinical features, such as age, disease duration and motor impairment, with special regard to lingual protrusion ability, dysarthria and bradykinesia. The total functional capacity (TFC) and cognitive scales did not show significant correlation with DOSS levels. The results of clinical examination of swallowing indicated that dysphagia is a prevalent motor symptom of HD
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
