1,721,020 research outputs found
Figure 4 in Smenispa irregularis (Bleeker, 1857) (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae), a Buccal-attaching Fish Parasite from Australia
No full textFigure 4. Smenispa irregularis, male (9 mm) (AM P89833). (A–D) pereopod 1, 2, 6, 7 respectivelY; (E) ventral view of pleotelson. Scales: A–D= 0.25 mm; E = 1 mm.Published as part of Martin, Melissa B., Bruce, Niel L. & Nowak, Barbara F., 2014, Smenispa irregularis (Bleeker, 1857) (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae), a Buccal-attaching Fish Parasite from Australia, pp. 233-240 in Records of the Australian Museum 66 (4) on page 238, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.66.2014.1602, http://zenodo.org/record/468474
FIGURE 21 in Review of the fish-parasitic genus Cymothoa Fabricius, 1793 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae) from Australia
No full textFIGURE 21. Cymothoa propria, ovigerous female paratype (15 mm; APK 75002-75005). A–E, pereopods 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 respectively.Published as part of Martin, Melissa B., Bruce, Niel L. & Nowak, Barbara F., 2016, Review of the fish-parasitic genus Cymothoa Fabricius, 1793 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae) from Australia, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4119 (1) on page 36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4119.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/25850
Ceratothoa novaezelandiae Filhol 1885
No full textCeratothoa novaezelandiae Filhol, 1885 Ceratothoa Novae –Zelandiae Filhol, 1885: 449. Meinertia novae –zelandiae.— Hutton, 1904: 262. Codonophilus novae –zeelandiae.— Nierstrasz, 1931: 132. Ceratothoa novae –zelandiae.— Trilles, 1973 b: 1245. Ceratothoa novaezelandiae.— Collette, 1974: 19.— Hadfield, Bruce & Smit, 2014 a: 33. Types and type locality. The male holotype (13 mm; sample 62; MNHN) was collected from Dunedin, New Zealand by Captain Hutton from an unknown host (Filhol 1885). Remarks. Trilles (1973 b) examined what he considered to be the holotype of Ceratothoa novaezelandiae, the specimen data corresponding with that in Filhol’s (1885) description. Trilles (1973 b) stated that C. novaezelandiae was similar to C. trigonocephala and considered the species to be synonymous with C. trigonocephala. Hadfield et al. (2014 a) mentioned that the identity of C. novaezelandiae could not be confirmed and the synonymy with C. trigonocephala was not upheld. Although the holotype of C. novaezelandiae was not examined, we consider that synonymy (Trilles 1973 b) with C. trigonocephala is open to question as the holotype is a male specimen. Ceratothoa novaezelandiae is therefore brought out of synonymy with C. trigonocephala and is here regarded as species inquirenda. Hosts. Unknown. Distribution. Dunedin, New Zealand (Filhol 1885).Published as part of Martin, Melissa B., Bruce, Niel L. & Nowak, Barbara F., 2015, Review of the fish-parasitic genus Ceratothoa Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae) from Australia, with description of two new species, pp. 251-294 in Zootaxa 3963 (3) on pages 286-287, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24217
Glossobius
No full textKey to the species of Glossobius 1. Body with scattered pigmentation; posterior margins of pereonites 3–5 with median point; posterior margin of pleotelson rounded.......................................................................... Glossobius parexocoetii – Body without scattered pigmentation; posterior margins of pereonites 3–5 without median point; posterior margin of pleotelson not rounded...................................................................................... 2 2. Rostrum acute; pleopod 1 lateral margin weakly convex; uropod exopod longer than endopod....... Glossobius hemiramphi – Rostrum rounded or blunt; pleopod 1 lateral margin strongly convex; uropod exopod similar or shorter than endopod...... 3 3. Labrum prominent, posterolateral margins produced; pleon as wide as or less wide than pereonite 7 width; coxae 2–7 anteroventral margins broader than posteroventral margins....................................... Glossobius anctus – Labrum small, posterolateral margins narrowly rounded; pleon wider than pereonite 7 width; coxae 2–7 anteroventral margins similar size to posteroventral margins..................................................................... 4 4. Body subparallel; pereonites 1 and 2 with large bulbous lateral lobe; pereopod 3 dactylus larger and longer than other dactyli, two or more times longer than pereopod 3 propodus......................................... Glossobius impressus – Body sub-rhomboid; pereonites 1 and 2 without bulbous lateral lobe; pereopod 3 dactylus no longer or no larger than other dactyli, less than twice or less as long as pereopod 3 propodus................................... Glossobius auritusPublished as part of Martin, Melissa B., Bruce, Niel L. & Nowak, Barbara F., 2015, Review of the buccal-attaching fish parasite genus Glossobius Schioedte & Meinert, 1883 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae), pp. 337-350 in Zootaxa 3973 (2) on page 339, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3973.2.8, http://zenodo.org/record/23858
Glossobius parexocoetii Kononenko & Mordvinova 1988
No full textGlossobius parexocoetii Kononenko & Mordvinova, 1988 Glossobius parexocoetii Kononenko & Mordvinova, 1988: 103, figs. 1–3. Type and type locality. The holotype (ZMMU No.Mc 1033) and paratype (ZMMU No.Mc 1034) were collected off Conakry, Guinea, from sailfin flyingfish Parexocoetus brachypterus (Richardson, 1846) and deposited at The Zoological Museum of Moscow University (ZMMU). Remarks. Glossobius parexocoetii is identified by the subparallel body shape, rostrum subacute, slender antennula and antenna, lack of bulbous lobe on pereonite 1, rounded pleotelson posterior margin and subequal uropod rami. Kononenko & Mordvinova (1988) provided figures of the antennula, antenna, mouthparts and uropods of the female and male G. parexocoetii type. The female and male share similar morphological characteristics: 3 maxillula setae, 7 antennula segments, 9 antenna segments and subequal uropod rami lengths. The female differs from the male by having: maxilliped article 3 with 2 setae (compared to 1 seta), maxilla with 10 setae (compared to 4 setae), and the article 3 of the mandibular palp is without a setae (compared to 1 seta). Glossobius parexocoetii differs from G. impressus in the less prominent lateral lobes on pereonite 1, pereonite 4 subrectangular, pleonites 1–5 with concave posterior margins, antenna with 9 segments (compared to 8 segments), and pleotelson posterior margin rounded (Kononenko & Mordvinova 1988). Distribution. Reported from the tropical eastern North Atlantic Ocean (Kononenko & Mordvinova 1988). Hosts. Reported from Parexocoetus brachypterus (Kononenko & Mordvinova 1988).Published as part of Martin, Melissa B., Bruce, Niel L. & Nowak, Barbara F., 2015, Review of the buccal-attaching fish parasite genus Glossobius Schioedte & Meinert, 1883 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae), pp. 337-350 in Zootaxa 3973 (2) on page 346, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3973.2.8, http://zenodo.org/record/23858
Ceratothoa contracta Miers 1880
No full textCeratothoa contracta (Miers, 1880) Cymothoa contracta White: 1847: 110 [nomen nudum]. Lironeca contracta Miers, 1880: 466 (footnote).— Avdeev, 1975: 24.— Ellis, 1981: 124.— Trilles, 1994: 176. Livoneca contracta.— Nierstrasz, 1931: 144. Ceratothoa contracta.— Bruce, 1990: 286. Types and type locality. The syntypes are held at the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH 1844: 105; 1846: 89) (Ellis 1981; Bruce 1990) from an unknown host. Type locality is unknown according to Ellis (1981) but mentioned as Australia by White (1847) and Miers (1880). Remarks. White (1847) mentioned a new species, without description or figures, from the collections of the Natural History Museum, London, collected in Australia by J. B. Jukes, Esq. and Earl of Derby. Miers (1880, p. 466) validated the species in a footnote as Lironeca contracta, comparing the species to Ichthyoxenus jellinghausii Herklots, 1870 “…apparently distinguished by the much broader basis articles of the last four pereopods and a subacute rostrum”. Bruce (1990) later transferred the species to Ceratothoa (see Bruce & Bowman 1989) based on antennula, pereopod and pleon morphology, although the body shape is wider than usual for the genus. A request to borrow the syntypes was unsuccessful as the specimens could not be located or may have been lost (Miranda Lowe, personal communication). Until the specimens can be located and redescribed, C. contracta is regarded as species inquirenda. Hosts. Unknown. Distribution. Australia (White 1847; Miers 1880).Published as part of Martin, Melissa B., Bruce, Niel L. & Nowak, Barbara F., 2015, Review of the fish-parasitic genus Ceratothoa Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae) from Australia, with description of two new species, pp. 251-294 in Zootaxa 3963 (3) on pages 285-286, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24217
Ceratothoa contracta Miers 1880
No full textCeratothoa contracta (Miers, 1880) Cymothoa contracta White: 1847: 110 [nomen nudum]. Lironeca contracta Miers, 1880: 466 (footnote).— Avdeev, 1975: 24.— Ellis, 1981: 124.— Trilles, 1994: 176. Livoneca contracta.— Nierstrasz, 1931: 144. Ceratothoa contracta.— Bruce, 1990: 286. Types and type locality. The syntypes are held at the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH 1844: 105; 1846: 89) (Ellis 1981; Bruce 1990) from an unknown host. Type locality is unknown according to Ellis (1981) but mentioned as Australia by White (1847) and Miers (1880). Remarks. White (1847) mentioned a new species, without description or figures, from the collections of the Natural History Museum, London, collected in Australia by J. B. Jukes, Esq. and Earl of Derby. Miers (1880, p. 466) validated the species in a footnote as Lironeca contracta, comparing the species to Ichthyoxenus jellinghausii Herklots, 1870 “…apparently distinguished by the much broader basis articles of the last four pereopods and a subacute rostrum”. Bruce (1990) later transferred the species to Ceratothoa (see Bruce & Bowman 1989) based on antennula, pereopod and pleon morphology, although the body shape is wider than usual for the genus. A request to borrow the syntypes was unsuccessful as the specimens could not be located or may have been lost (Miranda Lowe, personal communication). Until the specimens can be located and redescribed, C. contracta is regarded as species inquirenda. Hosts. Unknown. Distribution. Australia (White 1847; Miers 1880).Published as part of Martin, Melissa B., Bruce, Niel L. & Nowak, Barbara F., 2015, Review of the fish-parasitic genus Ceratothoa Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae) from Australia, with description of two new species, pp. 251-294 in Zootaxa 3963 (3) on pages 285-286, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24217
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
