210,089 research outputs found
SUCCESSION OPPORTUNITIES IN FAMILY BUSINESS PRO-AVTO NOVAK, ERIKA NOVAK, S.P.
No full textDružinska podjetja so še vedno slabo raziskano področje v gospodarski panogi, še posebej v Sloveniji, saj je na to temo zelo malo literature, je pa to področje, ki postaja vedno bolj zanimivo za podjetnike. Pri družinskem podjetju gre za združitev družine in podjetja v harmonizirano celoto, saj je po navadi družina ustanovitelja posredno ali neposredno vključena v razvoj in delovanje podjetja. Ta podjetja imajo pomembno prednost pred ostalimi, saj je pripadnost podjetju dosti višja, kot v drugih, ne družinskih podjetjih, kar lahko privede do boljšega uspeha podjetja.
V diplomskem seminarju smo preučili izbrano družinsko podjetje Pro-avto Novak, Erika Novak, s.p. na podlagi praktične aplikacije različnih avtorjev, še posebej smo se osredotočili na vprašanje nasledstva družinskega podjetja, saj je ta točka v vseh družinskih podjetjih kritična za obstoj. Proces planiranja nasledstva je zelo pomemben za obstoj družinskega podjetja, ki ga žal veliko družinskih podjetij začne prepozno ali premalo natančno, kar lahko privede do komplikacij tako v domačem okolju, kot v podjetju in lahko v najhujšem primeru celo privede do zaprtja tega podjetja in predvsem pa velikih sporov v družini. Tistim podjetjem, ki se na planiranje nasledstva pravočasno osredotočijo, uspešen prenos iz ene v drugo generacijo prinese uspešno nadaljnje poslovanje podjetja in uspeh ter ugled v poslovnem in domačem okolju.
V družinskem podjetju, ki smo ga preučili, so se planiranja nasledstva le dotaknili in do danes niso podrobno preučili. Lastnik/manager je vključil v podjetje svoje otroke že zgodaj, odločil se je, da želi, da podjetje prevzame eden od otrok, vendar se še ni odločil, komu in kako bo prepustil podjetje.
Lastnik podjetja je začasno predal podjetje svoji ženi, ampak še vedno sam aktivno vodi podjetje. Oba otroka, ki sta bodoča in morebitna naslednika, še nista dokončala šolanja. Če se lastnik ne bo kmalu posvetoval s celotno družino, kako naprej in podrobno planiral nasledstva, zna priti do manjših komplikacij, ko bo prišlo do neizogibne odločitve. Po našem mnenju pa ni nujno, da bi bilo to uničujoče za podjetje.
Po preučeni literaturi vidimo, da se vsi avtorji strinjajo in tudi praksa kaže na to, da je za obstoj in razvoj družinskega podjetja pri prenosu lastništva pomembno, da se nasledstvo natančno planira, saj bo le tako zadeva potekala nemoteno in brez večjih komplikacij in presenečenj tako v družini, kot v podjetju Pro-avto Novak, s.p.Family businesses are still poorly studied area in the industry, especially in Slovenia, because the topic is not mentioned alot in the literature, but it is an area of study that is becoming increasingly interesting for entrepreneurs. In family business is all about uniting family and business as a harmonized whole, because it is usually the founders family that is directly or indirectly involved in the development and activities of the company. On one hand, these companies have an advantage over others, because loyalty to the company is much higher than in other non-family firms, which may lead to better business success.
In the graduate seminar, we examine the entire family business selected on the basis of the theory by various authors, especially focused on the issue of succession of family business, since this point in family businesses is critical for survival of the business. The process of succession planning is the most important for the existence of the family business, which is unfortunately in a lot of family firms undertaken too late or in to small detail, which can lead to complications at home and in the company and in the worst case even to the closure of businesses and major conflicts in the family. Those companies that do take succession planning under great consideration in time, and successfuly transfer from the first to the second generation, brings a successful future to the family business and success and reputation in the industry and home environment.
In the chosen family business, we have studied, they didn\u27t took the succession planning as seriously as the should, and they didn\u27t discussed it in detail. The owner/manager includet his children in the company eary on, because he knew he wanted the business to stay in the family, but has not yet decided whom and how he will leave the company. The business owner has temporarily handed company to his wife, but he is still actively involved with the company, because the children had not yet completed their education. If the owner will not consult soon with the whole family and do a detailed plan for succession, it can get to the smaller complications when it comes to the inevitable decision who to leave the company to, but in our opinion it will not be devastating to the company, because they are already making some plans in this direction.
With all the studied literature and articles, we can see that a lot of authors agree with each other and the practice shows that the existence and development of the family business after the transfer of ownership is important to make a great succession plan carefully, because only then will it be smoothly and without major complications and surprises both in the family and the company
Nemastoma bidentatum subsp. gruberi Novak, Slana Novak, Kozel & Raspotnig 2021, ssp. nov.
No full textNemastoma bidentatum gruberi Novak, Slana Novak, Kozel & Raspotnig ssp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 17EA28A1-5F36-4DFC-9191-9C8680496FAC Figs 1A, C, 2– 3, 4E, 5E, 6E, 7E, 8E, 9E, 10E, 11E, 12E, 13D; Table 8 Nemastoma bidentatum sparsum – Novak et al. 2002: 136 [partim: Brežice, Črnomelj, Kočevje, Krško, Litija, Metlika, Novo mesto, Ribnica, Sevnica,Trebnje]. — Novak 2004b: 245 [partim: Buje, Karojba, Vižinada]; 2005b: 105. Diagnosis Relatively long-legged subspecies of Nemastoma bidentatum, with strait Ch ventral margin, and Pa-Fe with either 4 subequidistantly positioned spines or pointed tubercles or long setae on low protrusions, or their combination in the distal Pa-Fe half, or alternatively, with 2–3 distal stout thorns. Rec sem with one tubular and 12 elongated balloon-like vesicles. Etymology The subspecies name ʻ gruberi ʼ is dedicated to Jürgen Gruber (Vienna), our teacher, colleague and friend, who generously introduced us to the taxonomy of harvestmen and helped in identifying problematic specimens. Material examined Holotype SLOVENIA – WL18 • 1 ♂; Dolenje Laknice, Mokronog; 45.93° N, 15.21° E; 237 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct. 2013; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg.; mixed forest litter sift; PMSL-Opiliones-GR 4661. Paratypes SLOVENIA – WL18 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; PMSL-Opiliones-GR 4664 • 5 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; PMSL-Opiliones-GR4662, GR4666, GR4667, GR4669, GR4673, GR4676 to GR4679. Other material ITALY – VL05 • 1 ♀; Chiusa/Ricmanje; 29 Sep. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (275/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL15 • 1 ♀; Basovizza/Bazovica; 29 Sep. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (271/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL. CROATIA – UL92 • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ (paratypes of N. b. sparsum); vicinity of Buje, and VL02, Vižinada; Sep. 1963; R. Sturany leg.; NHMW 4700. – VL01 • 1 ♂; Karojba; 28 Feb. 1990; F. Potočnik leg. (1307/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL13 • 1 ♀; Mlini; 30 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (32/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL. – XL90 • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Ponor Sušik, Drežnik; 8 Sep. 2009; A. Schönhofer leg. (Coll. ASc 334, ASc det., TN rev. 5/2012); PMSL. SLOVENIA – UL93 • 4 ♀♀, 1 juv.; Abrami; 19 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (148/1999, rev. 2018); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 20 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (188/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♀; Dragonja; 14 Sep. 2000; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (154/2001, rev. 2015); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Dragonja valley; 26 Jun. 2015; T. Novak leg. (78/2015 = GR 5123−5130); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Ivankovec; 23 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1791/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; Lucija–Seča – Debernardo; 22 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1817/1998, rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♂; Korte; 23 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1821/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 33 ♂♂, 30 ♀♀; Medljan, Korte; 21 Aug. 1999; T. Novak leg. (239/1999, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 juv.; ibid.; 22 Jun. 2000; B. Bertoncelj, B. Ogrizek and T. Novak leg. (217/2000, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (218/2000, TN rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♂; Padna; 19 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (168/1999, rev. 2017); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; Parecag; 23 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1788/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; Seča; 10 Oct. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1844/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; 24 Oct. 1998, L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1881/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; ibid.; 21 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (236/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 15 ♂♂, 21 ♀♀; ibid.; 21 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (231/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 6 ♀♀; Sečovlje; 1 Mar. 2009; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂; Sv. Peter; 11 Oct. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1850/1998, rev. 2015); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Sv. Sab, Padna; 19 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (151/1999, rev. 2009); PMSL • 1 ♀; Škrline, Dragonja; 20 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (194/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL03 • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Boršt; 14 Apr. 2011; T. Novak leg. (76/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (81/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL04 • 1 ♀; Ankaran; 29 Sep. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (276/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Kolombini, Spodnje Škofije; 26 Sep. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (94/2007, rev. 2018); PMSL • 5 ♂♂; Mlinarji – Osp; 26 Sep. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (97/2007, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Rižana; 24 Sep. 2016; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (18/2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; Škocjanski zatok, Koper; 15 Oct. 2009; S. Polak leg. (PK 1/2015); NM • 4 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Zgornje Škofije – Tinjan; 26 Sep. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (88/2007); PMSL. – VL07 • 4 ♀♀; Hrastje, Šmarje; 17 Aug. 2000 (674/2000, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL13 • 1 ♂; Poletiči, Kubed; 4 Sep. 2016; T. Marinko leg. (27/2016); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Sočerga; 28 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (31/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL14 • 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Bezovica; 29 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 1/1990, TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; Hrpelje, Kozina; 2 Apr. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (651/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 2 ♂♂; Predloka; 29 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (35/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Rižana; 29 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (33/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL15 • 1 ♀; Botač; 22 Mar. 1990; M. Černila, B. Horvat and I. Sivec leg. (1246/1997); PMSL. – VL16 • 1 ♂; Divača; 2 Apr. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (174/2001, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL17 • 1 ♂; Vrabče, Podnanos; 10 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (632/1998, rev. 2017); PMSL. – VL18 • 1 ♂; Uhanje; 3 Sep. 2001; T. Novak leg. (329/2001, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL23 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Poljane pri Podgradu; 18 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (166/2012, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL25 • 3 ♀♀; Buje; 10 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (163/2001, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Goriče pri Framljah; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (343/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (344/2011); PMSL. – VL28 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Podvrh, Raka; 18 Jul. 2012; P. Kozel, T. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (55/2012); PMSL • 9 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀; ibid.; (GR 3734–3746); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; ibid.; (GR 3791); PMSL. – VL29 • 6 ♂♂, 12 ♀♀; Dolnje Brezovo, Sevnica; 30 Jun. 2012; (GR 3670–3683); PMSL. – VL36 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Palčje – Mt. Javorniki; 1 Oct. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (361/2011, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL45 • 1 ♀; Koritnice − Mašun; 2 Oct. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (329/2011, rev. 2014); PMSL. – VL47 • 1 ♀; Suha reber, Koritnice; 21 Jan. 2007; S. Polak leg. (107/2007); NM. – VL54 • 1 ♀; Sviščaki; 20 May 1989; T. Trilar leg. (271/2000, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 25 May 1989; T. Trilar leg. (275/2000, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 21 Jul. 2001; B. Bertoncelj, U. Bertoncelj and T. Novak leg. (29/2001, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (34/2001, rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀; Travni Dolci, Mt. Snežnik; 12 Aug. 2001; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (195a/2001, rev. 2020); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Mt. Veliki Snežnik; 20 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (185a/1999, rev. 2020); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 12 Sep. 2018; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (116/2018); PMSL. – VL36 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Palčje − Javorniki; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (361/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL66 • 1 ♀; Benete, Runarsko; 31 May 2004; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (33/2004, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL67 • 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Nova vas – Volčje; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (25/2006, rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♂; Runarsko; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (38/2006, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Veliki vrh, Runarsko; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (36/2006, rev. 2015); PMSL • 7 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Volčje; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (28/2006, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL69 • 1 ♂; Veliki vrh pri Šmarju; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (156/2011); PMSL. – VL74 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Goteniški Snežnik; 28 May 2000; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (247/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♀; Strma reber, Zgornji Čačiči; 27 Sep. 1996; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 126/1996, TN rev. 2008); PMSL. – VL75 • 2 ♂♂; Draga; 17 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (94/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Mt. Goteniški Snežnik; 28 May 2000; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (253/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL. – VL76 • 1 ♂; Bukovica, Ribnica; Jul.1994; B. Oven leg. (LSN 25/1996, TN rev. 2009); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Lipovšica, Sodražica; 22 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (100/2011, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; Nova Štifta; 22 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (105/2011); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Ribnica; 6 Sep. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (828/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (831/2000, rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♀; Mt. Turn; 27 Jun. 1980; B. Drovenik leg. (383/2002, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 28 Aug. 1980; B. Drovenik leg. (394/2002, rev. 2009); PMSL. – VL77 • 1 ♂; Dolnje Retje; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (161/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Rašica, Velike Lašče; 16 Jun. 1986 (261/2002, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Velike Poljane, Ortnek; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (142/2011, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL78 • 1 ♂; Laporje; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (151/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Zagradec pri Grosupljem; 7 Jul. 1986; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (500/2002, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL79 • 1 ♀; Veliki Lipoglav − Dobrinje; 8 Jul. 1986; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (467/2002, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL83 • 2 ♂♂; Vršič, Banjaloka; 24 Apr. 2001; S. Brelih leg. (121/2001, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL84 • 1 ♂; Jelenja vas; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (137a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (153/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Pleš, Borovec pri Kočevski Reki; 19 Sep. 2013; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (71/2013, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL85 • 1 ♀; Grčarice; 18 Oct. 2013; T. Novak leg. (63/2013, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Grčarske Ravne; 18 Oct. 2013; T. Novak leg. (66/2013, TN rev. 2019); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; Kočevje; 6 Sep. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (822/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (825/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Stojna, Kočevje; 25 Oct. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (92/2001, rev. 2008); PMSL. – VL86 • 1 ♀; Dolenja vas; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (110/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (154/2012, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL87 • 1 ♂; Breg pri Zagradcu; 4 Nov. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (805/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – VL89 • 1 ♀; Potok, Stična; 4 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (658/1998, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL93 • 1 ♂; Brsnik, Fara; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (157/2011, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL94 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Dolenja Žaga; 29 Apr. 2001; S. Brelih leg. (131/2001, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♀; Dolenja Žaga – Podstene; 26 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (90/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Gorenja Žaga; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (111a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (159/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Ograja; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (109a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (121a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (144/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (148/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Ograja – Suhor − Morava; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (120a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (138a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (152/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Ograja – Zdihovo; 26 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (76/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 3 juvs; ibid.; 12 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (32/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 2 juvs; Podstene pri Kostelu; 12 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (24/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂; Rajndol; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (821/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Srednji Potok, Banja Loka; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (68/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 2 juvs; Štalcerski preval; 12 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (33/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL. – VL95 • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Dolga vas; 17 Aug. 1985; T. Novak, M. Slana Novak and L. Slana Novak leg. (LSN 97/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Livold; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (123a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (158/2011); PMSL. – VL97 • 1 ♀; Dvor, Lašče; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (112/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Železno, Dobrnič; 4 Nov. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (812/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – VL99 • 3 ♀♀; Nova gora, Čatež; 15 Aug. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (61/2007, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VM80 • 1 ♂; Litija; 10 Sep. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (809/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (834/2000, rev. 2015); PMSL. – WL03 • 2 ♂♂; Dolenje Kozice; 18 Apr.−13 May 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (509/2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 18 Apr.−13 May 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (550/2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 5 Jul. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Pirnat leg. (1135/2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 6 Aug. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Pirnat leg. (1090/2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 30 Sep. –28 Oct. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (PK 64/2012); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 25 Nov. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Pirnat leg. (270/2018); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 25 Nov. −23 Dec. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (1027/2018); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Srednji Radenci; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 51/1986, rev. 2008); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Stari trg ob Kolpi; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (851/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Dolenji Radenci – Breg pri Sinjem vrhu; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (135a/2011); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (149/2011); PMSL. – WL05 • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀, 1 juv.; Črmošnjice; 16 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (160/1997); PMSL • 1 ♀; Koprivnik, Kočevski Rog; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (867/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Mt. Mirna gora; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (59/2015); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; ibid.; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (66/2015); PMSL. – WL06 • 1 ♂; Cerovec − Selišče, Podturn pri Dolenjskih toplicah; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (145/2011, rev. 2017); PMSL. – WL07 • 1 ♂; Boršt pri Dvoru; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (113/2012); PMSL • 1 ♀; Prečna, Mirna; Jun. 2000; V. Jaćimović leg. (PK and TN 100/2020); PMSL. – WL08 • 1 ♂; Rdeči kal, Dobrnič; 4 Nov. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (872/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Trebnje; 29 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (787/2000, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (787a/2000, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (788/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL. – WL13 • 4 ♀♀; Balkovci, Vinica; 15 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (212/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Dolenji Radenci – Breg pri Sinjem vrhu; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (146/2011); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Kot pri Dramlju; 16 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (207/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Špeharji, Vinica; 16 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (201/1999, rev. 2006); PMSL • 6 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Vinica – Sinji vrh; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 59/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂; Vukovci; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (764/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL14 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Bistrica, Črnomelj; 26 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (65/1999, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; Črnomelj; 15 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (221/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 2 juvs; Desinec – Črnomelj; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (385/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Tanča gora; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (861/1998, rev. 2015); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Sinji vrh, Vinica; 16 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (205/1999, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL15 • 1 ♀; Krupa spring; 10 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (808/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 6 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 3 juvs; Lokve, Črnomelj; 2 Jul. 1995; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (105/1997, rev. 2009); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Mihelja vas; 18 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 55/1986, TN rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; Praprot; 6 Aug. 1997; T. Novak leg. (418/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (432/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 22 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (37/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (110/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Stranska vas; 22 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (108/1999, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Vrčice; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (110/2012); PMSL • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀; Vrčice – Semič; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (64/2015); PMSL. – WL16 • 2 ♀♀; Laze, Uršna Sela; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (103/2012, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (108/2012, rev. 2018); PMSL. – WL17 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Brod, Novo Mesto; 31 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (811/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Novo mesto; Karaman leg. (87/1983 microscopic preparation, JH det., TN rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; Karaman leg. (108/1983 microscopic preparation, JH det., TN rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (814/2000); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (153/2018 microscopic preparation, JH det., TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀, 1 ♀; ibid.; 31 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (811/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Ratež; 29 Apr. 1995; S. Brelih leg. (750/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL18 • 6 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Dolenje Laknice; 26 Oct. 2013; T. Novak leg. (GR 4661, 4662, 4664, 4666, 4667, 4669, 4673, 4676, 4677−4679); PMSL. – WL19 • 1 ♀; Boštanj – Mokronog – Križ; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (70/2007, rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Jelovec; 15 Aug. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (56/2007); PMSL. – WL23 • 1 ♂; Zilje; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (767/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Zilje – Vinica; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (364/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL24 • 5 ♂♂, 1 ♀, 1 juv.; Gorenjci pri Adlešičih; 15 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (218/1999, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Dragoši, Griblje; 18 Apr. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (733/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Griblje − Desinec; 16 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (161/1997, rev. 2009); PMSL. – WL25 • 1 ♂; Bečka jama cave, Cad. No. 6275, Boldraž; 9 Jun. 2004; V. Germovšek, T. Tkavc, A. Kocuvan and T. Novak leg. (21/2004, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Božakovo; 3 May 2004; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (48/2004, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Bušinja vas; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (743/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀; Kapljišče; 16 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 113/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 juv.; ibid. (LSN 119/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; Metlika; 31 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (816/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (818/2000, rev. 2015); PMSL • 7 ♂♂, 9 ♀♀; Trnovec, Metlika; 23 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (141/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Sv. Urban, Metlika; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (784/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL26 • 1 ♂; Krašnji vrh; 9 Jun. 2004; V. Germovšek, T. Tkavc, A. Kocuvan and T. Novak leg. (37/2004, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Markučev Mlin, Krašnji vrh; 1 Jul. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (21/2007); PMSL • 4 &fema
Nemastoma bidentatum subsp. martensi Novak, Slana Novak & Raspotnig 2021, ssp. nov.
No full text<i>Nemastoma bidentatum martensi</i> Novak, Slana Novak & Raspotnig ssp. nov. <p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CCDC54EF-D41A-4547-A4D4-50370212C243</p> <p>Figs 2–3, 4G, 5G, 6G, 7G, 8G, 9G, 10G, 11G, 12G, 13F; Table 10</p> Diagnosis <p> Subspecies of <i>Nemastoma bidentatum</i> with Ch basal article with a saw-like series of 1–3 μm high denticles on anterior margin of ventral hump, and a row of 5–11 denticles and tubercles in the distal half of Pa-Fe. Rec sem of 12–14 slightly elongated balloon-like vesicles.</p> Etymology <p> The subspecies name ʻ <i>martensi</i> ʼ is dedicated to Jochen Martens (Mainz), our teacher, colleague and friend, who provided the first modern revision of harvestmen in Slovenia.</p> Material examined <p> <b>Holotype</b> SLOVENIA – <b>VL23</b> • 1 ♂; Poljane pri Podgradu; 45.50° N, 14.10° E; 597 m a.s.l.; 25 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg.; thermophile scrub and mixed forest litter sift; PMSL-Opiliones-TN 287/2011. <b>Paratypes</b> SLOVENIA – <b>VL23</b> • 8 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; PMSL-Opiliones-TN 287/2011.</p> <p> <b>Other material</b></p> <p> SLOVENIA – <b>VL15</b> • 3 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀; Buje; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (316/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL • 2 ♂♂; ibid.; (316a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Mt. Ostrič; 29 Aug. 2014; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (32/2014); PMSL. – <b>VL23</b> • 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Poljane pri Podgradu; 15 May 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (40/2012); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 18 Aug. 2011; (165/2012); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 20 May 2012; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (GR 3597−3601, TN det.); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 24 Oct. 2013; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (GR 6017, 6018, 6020, TN det.); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; ibid.; 28 Oct. 2013; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (GR 4651, 4653, 4654, 4656, 4657, 4659, TN det.); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Velika Medvižica; 18 Jul. 2014; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (15/2014); PMSL. – <b>VL24</b> • 1 ♂; Mala Plešivica, Golac; 20 Sep. 2012; T. Novak leg. (169/2012); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 5 Oct. 2012; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (PK 20/2012, TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 21 May 2014; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (PK 18/2014); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (PK 18/2014); PMSL • 1 ♂; Mt. Mala Pleševica – Mt. Lipica; 19 Oct. 2014; T. Novak leg. (26/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂; Obrov – Golac; 19 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (253/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Mt. Velika Pleševica; 19 Oct. 2014; T. Novak leg. (14/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (16/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂; Velika vrata, Mt. Velika Pleševica; 6 Oct. 2012; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (186/2012); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (PK 16/2012, TN rev. 2018); PMSL. – <b>VL25</b> • 1 ♀; Buje – Suhorje; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (298/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL26</b> • 3 ♂♂; Fameljska loza, Senožeče; 1 Oct. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (351/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL33</b>; PMSL • 3 ♂♂; Starod; 25 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (269/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL34</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Harije; 19 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (224a/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL43</b> • 2 ♀♀; Novokrajska jama cave, Cad. No. 810, Novokračine; 21 Jul. 2006; P. Trontelj and M. Zagmajster leg. (PK and TN 96/2020); PMSL • Novokračine; 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (307/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – <b>VL44</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Jablanica – Trpčane; 9 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (252/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – <b>VL53</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Šešnovica; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (300/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL54</b> • 1 ♀; Bezgovec, Zabiče; 13 Nov.–10 Dec. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (PK 50/2012; TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 16 Oct.–13 Nov. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (PK 58/2012; TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; Mt. Snežnik; 12 Sep. 2018; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (116b/2018); PMSL. – <b>VL84</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Pleš, Borovec pri Kočevski Reki; 19 Sep. 2013; T. Novak leg. (60/2013, rev. 2015); PMSL. – <b>VL87</b> • 1 ♂; Veliki Grintovec, Zagradec, Žužemberk; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (117/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL.</p> Description <p> <b>Male</b> (holotype)</p> <p>BODY. Length 1.63, width 1.26.</p> <p>CHELICERAE. Ch basal article (without Apo) length 0.57, 2.5 times as long as wide at Ch max width at dorsal hump, and with a saw-like series of 1–3 μm high denticles on anterior margin of ventral hump (not visible on Figs). Ch-Apo small, 0.31 times as high as basal article length, rounded-trapezoid, widest distally, highest posteriorly; Ch-Apo height 0.18, max width 0.15, min width 0.09 (at the base), frontal margin quarter moon-like. Secretion field medially. Distal article length 0.58, max width 0.19, movable finger length 0.23 (Figs 4G, 5G, 6G).</p> <p> PEDIPALPS. Pa-Tr oval-trapezoid, moderately high (Pa-Tr height:length <i>~</i> 0.6:1), Pa-Fe moderately robust (Pa-Fe min:max width ~1:3.0), with 7 subequidistant low, stout, irregularly shaped tubercles and denticles in the distal Pa-Fe half. Pa-Pt moderately robust (length: max width ~ 1:4.0) (Figs 5G, 6G). Pa article lengths in Table 10.</p> <p>PENIS. Pe length 1.44, base 0.45, glans 0.12, stylus 0.07 (Figs 7G, 8G).</p> <p>LEGS. Pseudoarticle leg-Fe formula I−IV: 0−1−1−2. Tarsomere leg-Fe formula I−IV: 8−17−8−9. Leg article lengths in Table 10.</p> <p> <b>Female</b></p> <p>BODY. Length 2.23, width 1.60.</p> <p>CHELICERAE. Ch basal article length 0.60, 2.9 times as long as wide at dorsal hump, with slightly, evenly arched dorsal margin in front dorsal indentation, and medial straight portion in middle of slightly concave ventral margin (Fig. 13F). Distal article length 0.63, max width 0.20, movable finger length 0.23.</p> <p>PEDIPALPS. Pa-Tr with moderately high, arched, with straight posterior portion of dorsal margin, Pa-Fe slightly widened distally; Pa-Pt, Pa-Ti and Pa-Ta elongated (Fig. 13F). Pa article lengths in Table 10.</p> <p>OVIPOSITOR. Ovipositor length 0.94, Rec sem of 12–14 slightly elongated vesicles (Fig. 11G).</p> <p>LEGS. Leg article lengths in Table 10.</p> Distribution <p>Croatia, Slovenia. Vertical distribution in Slovenia: 320−1030 m a.s.l. Type locality: Poljane pri Podgradu (45.50° N, 14.10° E, 597 m a.s.l.), Slovenia.</p> Ecology <p> <i>Nemastoma b. martensi</i> ssp. nov. is native to lowland to submontane habitats with thermophile scrub and <i>Quercetalia pubescenti–petraeae</i> and <i>Tilia platyphyllos</i> Scop. forest communities, with partly substantial admixture of <i>Fagus sylvatica</i> and <i>Corylus avellana</i> L. in southwestern Slovenia. Phenology: adults probably eurychronous.</p>Published as part of <i>Novak, Tone, Novak, Ljuba Slana, Kozel, Peter, Schaider, Miriam Gudrun, Komposch, Christian, Lipovšek, Saška, Podlesnik, Jan, Paušič, Igor & Raspotnig, Günther, 2021, Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence, pp. 1-67 in European Journal of Taxonomy 777</i> on pages 28-30, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.777.1561, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5637112">http://zenodo.org/record/5637112</a>
Helga M. Novak and Günter Grass. A friendship in letters
No full textDie im Deutschen Literaturarchiv Marbach aufbewahrte Korrespondenz zwischen Helga M. Novak und Günter Grass wurde zum Anlass, die Kontakte der beiden Schriftsteller, auch anhand anderer Dokumente zu rekonstruieren. Ein Schwerpunkt ist die Darstellung der Unterstützung Novaks durch Grass ab Herbst 2004 bei ihren Bemühungen um eine Aufenthaltsgenehmigung in Deutschland. Es wird ebenfalls auf die Spuren der freundschaftlichen Beziehung im Werk von Grass und Helga M. Novak verwiesen. Zum Schluss wird in einem Exkurs die polnische Rezeption Novaks summarisch beschrieben.The correspondence between Helga M. Novak and Günter Grass, that’s found in the German Literature Archive Marbach, became an opportunity to reconstruct their contacts, also on the basis of other documents. A focal point is the autumn of 2004 when Grass supported Novak’s efforts to gain a residence permit in Germany. Traces of the friendly relationship were also reflected in the work of Grass and Helga M. Novak. Finally, Polish reception of Novak is briefly presented in digression
Helga M. Novak und Günter Grass. Eine Freundschaft in Briefen
No full textDie im Deutschen Literaturarchiv Marbach aufbewahrte Korrespondenz zwischen Helga M. Novak und Günter Grass wurde zum Anlass, die Kontakte der beiden Schriftsteller, auch anhand anderer Dokumente zu rekonstruieren. Ein Schwerpunkt ist die Darstellung der Unterstützung Novaks durch Grass ab Herbst 2004 bei ihren Bemühungen um eine Aufenthaltsgenehmigung in Deutschland. Es wird ebenfalls auf die Spuren der freundschaftlichen Beziehung im Werk von Grass und Helga M. Novak verwiesen. Zum Schluss wird in einem Exkurs die polnische Rezeption Novaks summarisch beschrieben.The correspondence between Helga M. Novak and Günter Grass, that’s found in the German Literature Archive Marbach, became an opportunity to reconstruct their contacts, also on the basis of other documents. A focal point is the autumn of 2004 when Grass supported Novak’s efforts to gain a residence permit in Germany. Traces of the friendly relationship were also reflected in the work of Grass and Helga M. Novak. Finally, Polish reception of Novak is briefly presented in digression
Recommended from our members
A letter from J.J. Novak to Dr. Hector P. Garcia regarding a form required to treat Lucio de La Rosa.
No full textA letter from J.J. Novak to Dr. Hector P. Garcia regarding a form required to treat Lucio de La Rosa
Hadzinia ferrani Novak & Kozel 2014, sp. n.
No full textHadzinia ferrani sp. n. Figs 1–25. Material examined. Holotype: ♂, the Ferranova buža cave, the Cave Cadastre No. 8085, N 45°58´35˝, E 14°15´07˝, Mt. Ulovka (801 m), Zaplana, Vrhnika, Slovenia, 29.XII.2012, the cave section of Hamex, - 75 m, on a flowstone concretion named Animal Planet, M. Ferran leg.: 1 ♂ and a ♂ chitinous remains−exuvium? (TN 1/2013; TN = Coll. T. Novak, finally in the Nat. Hist. Mus. of Slovenia, Ljubljana); 06.VIII.2005, the cave section of Stotka, - 100 m, on a wet wall, M. Ferran leg.: 1 juvenile (paratype) (TN 67/2013); 26.I.2013, Stotka, on a wet wall: 1 ♀ (allotype) (TN 2/2013), T. Novak leg.; 16.II.2013, Stotka: 1 ♀ (TN 2/2013) and Animal Planet: 1 ♀ (paratypes) (TN 68/2013), T. Novak, N. Matijević leg.; 11.IV.2014, Hodnik, - 170m, T. Delić, T. Šuštar, F. Gabrovšek leg.: 1 ♂ (in present courtesy of T. Delić). In addition, two observations are available: 30.IV.2005, Animal Planet, M. Ferran (photo): 1 ex., and 21.−22.IV.2012, - 170 m, A. Bizjak, M. Staut (observation): 1 ex. Diagnosis. Very small (1.1−1.4), highly specialized eyeless troglobiotic Hadzinia, characterized by its low ocular tubercle and long, thin appendages: basal cheliceral article 2/3 as long, and pedipalp 6-times as long as body. Pedipalp tarsus strongly bent ventrally. Glans with sparse, long, rod-like minute spines and a few conical minute spines. As far as has been established, H. ferrani sp. n. is endemic to the karst of Mt. Ulovka (801 m) in central Slovenia. Etymology. The species name ferrani is dedicated in honor of Milan Ferran (Ljubljana), who started the investigations within the Ferranova buža cave, and who discovered and collected the first specimen of this species. Description. Male, holotype: Body length 1.11, body tender, with scutum magnum. Color of body light beige (Figs 1, 2). Dorsum weakly sclerotized, with dense, short (up to 5 µm) mucronate, cuticular microtubercles (microtrichia) covering most of the cephalothorax and abdomen, gradually changing from microtrichia at the cephalothorax edges into dense tuberculate microgranula (Fig. 3). Ocular tubercle low but well pronounced, wider than long, starting half its length behind the anterior edge of the dorsal scutum. Cuticle of cephalothorax thicker in the center and thinner towards the edges, with scattered oval and irregularly shaped spots of thiner parts (Fig. 4). Eyes completely reduced, but former position indicated by round cuticular spots, where probably the reduced optical nerves emerged (seen under fluorescence; Fig. 4). Supracheliceral lamellae large, with straight frontal margin and mammillary tubercles, similar to those in female (Fig. 20) and H. karamani (Karaman, 2013, fig. 15). Coxae and ventral side of the body with sparse long setae in a transverse row close to the posterior border of each sternite (Figs 2, 21). Setae longest on pedipalp coxae. Chelicerae intense reddish-brown, long and slender (Figs 7, 9, 10), without apophysis and gland openings, resembling those of Nemaspela species. Lengths of basal article, distal article and movable finger, 0.78, 0.92 and 0.37, respectively. Basal segment basally and terminally widened, without apophysis and glandular pores, with an antero-superior group of three long bristles. Distal segment slender, elongated, frontally evenly set with long bristles, the longest ones as long as the article diameter. Fixed finger with two large black teeth and a series of 14 diaphanous teeth at the base; movable finger with six large teeth, becoming lower and longer towards the apex of the finger, and a series of 13 diaphanous teeth. Pedipalps light reddish-brown, without secondary sexual differences (Figs 6, 12), very long, slender, with scattered, very densely set clavate glandular setae on all articles, except trochanter, diminishing in size from femur till tarsus, and giving a voluminous appearance in living animals. Femur subterminally crooked ventrally, with a few dense short setae disto-dorsally. Patella as long as femur, distally slightly bent, with a group of short setae proximally and one long bristle distally. Tibia distally gradually narrowing. Tarsus long, slightly club-like and ventrally conspicuously bent at an angle of ca. 45°, with two long bristles. For lengths of articles, see Table 1. Legs (Fig. 5; Table 1) beige with darker article endings, very long and thin (L body: L leg II = 1: 22.7), with up to 22 pseudoarticulations (in metatarsus II). Claws simple, straight in preserved specimens (Fig. 5). Leg articles cylindrical, with dense cover of fine bristles, interspersed by few long ones (Fig. 5). Penis (Figs 8, 11; 21, here pay attention to protruding glans) longer than body (possibly caused by body shrinkage in alcohol), 1.22 long, glans 0.13, basis 0.20. Truncus dorsally bent, with nearly parallel margins, narrowest in the middle, slightly dorso-ventrally flattened. Basis straight, oval elongated, incised for about half its length. Glans brownish, elongated barrel-like and slightly wider than truncus, terminally truncated with a pair of conspicuous lateral humps encompassing medial furrow, with sparse long rod-like minute spines and few conical minute spines. Stylus emerging subapically, on the ventral side in the middle of terminal glans furrow between lateral humps (dorsal view). Female: Body length 1.40, whitish to slightly reddish-brown (Figs 14, 15, 22, 23, 24). Chelicerae as in male, somewhat more robust (Figs 16, 17). Lengths of basal article, distal article and movable finger 0.80, 0.98 and 0.42, respectively. Pedipalps (Fig. 13) as in male, lengths of articles see Table 1. Legs (Table 1; Figs 23, 24, distal tarsomerae Fig. 18) as in male, but relatively shorter. Claws as in male. Ovipositor (Fig. 19) ca. 0.45 long, receptacula seminis apparently monovesicular, less than 10 µm, either undeveloped in examined specimens (n=2) or very difficult to see. Relationships. Presently, H. ferrani sp. n. is the only other species described from the genus Hadzinia. Hadzinia ferrani sp. n. can be distinguished from H. karamani especially by its overall slender segments: relatively very long and slender chelicerae in H. ferrani sp. n. vs. relatively short and robust in H. karamani, straight and subterminally crooked vs. sinusoidally curved pedipalp femur, slender vs. thick patella, elongated barrel-shaped vs. truncated cone-like glans, and by long rod-like minute spines besides a few conical ones in H. ferrani sp. n. vs. only conical spines in H. karamani. Distribution. Hadzinia ferrani sp. n. has been found only in the Ferranova buža cave. The species is thus likely endemic to the western Dinaric karst, and probably restricted to the karstic region of Mt. Ulovka (801 m) in central Slovenia. Ecology. In the Ferranova buža cave, all records were taken from a depth of over 70 m beneath the surface where temperatures yielded 7.6 to over 10°C. Individuals were found on bare wet limestone walls beside trickling and seeping water, sometimes showered by water droplets, and on wet flowstone concretions and walls. Their relatively long appendages suggest adaptation to spacious habitats, while their movable, pointed claws enable efficient clinging in slippery and water-drenched sites. This indicates that H. ferrani sp. n. probably prefers terrestrial phreatic habitat sensu Jeannel (1926), i. e., habitats consisting of tiny water trickles in aerated channels inaccessible to humans. These channels originate in the epikarst and pass into the deep karstic massifs (Novak et al. 2012).Published as part of Novak, Tone & Kozel, Peter, 2014, Hadzinia ferrani, sp. n. (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae), a highly specialized troglobiotic harvestman from Slovenia, pp. 135-145 in Zootaxa 3841 (1) on pages 136-137, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3841.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/492830
„Ihr habt die Hereros ausgerottet!“ Der deutsche Kolonialismus in Südwestafrika im Werk von Helga M. Novak
No full textDer deutsche Kolonialismus in Südwestafrika und die Ausrottung der Herero bilden eine wichtige thematische Achse im Werk von Helga M. Novak. Die Analyse der einschlägigen Texte zeigt, dass die Autorin der in der DDR herrschenden Deutung des Kolonialismus stets verpflichtet blieb. Novak teilt die von den DDR-Historikern vertretene Kontinuitätsthese, laut der eine kontinuierliche Entwicklung zwischen dem wilhelminischen Kolonialismus und dem Faschismus bestanden habe. Eine Schlüsselfigur in Novaks Aufarbeitung des deutschen Kolonialismus bildet der General Lettow-Vorbeck, einer der Hauptverantwortlichen der Niederschlagung des Aufstands der Herero; die Verklärung als Held, der er in der Bundesrepublik der 1960er Jahre aufgrund seiner siegreichen Kriegskampagne in Ostafrika unterworfen wurde, belegt nach der Ansicht Novaks das Fortbestehen reaktionärer Kräfte in den Institutionen der BRD.Helga M. Novak often in her works refers to the German Colonialism in South West Africa and particularly to the genocide of the Herero. The analysis of the texts in which Novak dealt with these themes shows how the author remained lifelong devoted to the interpretation of colonialism which was prevailing in the GRD. Novak subscribed to the so called „continuity theory“, according to which a coherent development dating from the German Colonialism in the Era of Emperor Wilhelm II to Fascism became recognizable; furthemore Novak stigmatizated the glorification for which General LettowVorbeck, one of the main responsibles of the extermination of the Herero, was acclaimed in the Bundesrepublik of the 1960s because of his success in the military campaign in Eastafrica during the First World War. Owing to this example, Novak could give evidence of how reactionary tendencies remained in force within the institutions of the German Federal Republic
A Translation of Selected Short Stories by Helga M. Novak
No full textThis project is a translation of twenty short stories by Helga Novak, a contemporary author born in eastern Berlin. The stories were all written between 1965 and 1980. They are divided into four sections: Fish Factory, Carpet Weaving, Traveling, and Sojourn in a Crazy House. The first three sections consist of very short stories, approximately one page long, taken from Novak\u27s collection called Geselliges Beisammensein (Social Gathering). The last section is made up of three longer stories, each about 10 pages long, taken from Aufenthalt in einem irren Haus (Sojourn in a Crazy House), which represent some of Novak\u27s later work. I have also included a translator\u27s introduction, relating some of my experiences in translating a longer work and my position in the discourse of translation theory
„Die Wurzeln sind ausgerissen. Man ist nackt und fremd.“ Helga M. Novak und die rumäniendeutsche Literatur
No full text1985 besuchte Helga M. Novak erstmalig Rumänien. Ein schicksalhaftes Ereignis, bei der sie Freundschaften zu Vertretern der rumäniendeutschen Literatur knüpfte, die bereits die Ausreise in die Bundesrepublik beantragt hatten. In ihren Lebenswegen sah Helga M. Novak die eigene Biografie gespiegelt, die Hinwendung zu ihnen war damit gleichzeitig ein Weg zum einstigen Verlust von Heimat und Sprache.In 1985, Helga M. Novak visited Romania for the first time. A fateful incident because, during that time, she formed friendships to several representatives of Romanian-German literature who had already made their applications for an exit visa. In their journeys through life, Helga M. Novak saw her own biography because, meeting them, reminded her of her own loss of home and language
- …
