1,720,963 research outputs found
Comparison of Excess Weight Loss and Body Composition Between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients Following Gastic Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy
Background Bariatric surgery provides excellent results in term of weight loss and improve associated metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There is low evidence in literature about changes in body composition
in relation to different bariatric procedures and the presence of T2DM. Aim of this study is to evaluate changes in body composition in diabetic obese patients vs. non-diabetic obese patients who underwent different bariatric procedures, Gastric bypass (LRYGB) or Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG). Methods the Body composition of obese patients eligible to surgery was evaluated by bioelectrical impedence analysis (Tanita BC 418-MA) before and 1-year after surgery. A variation test was used to analyze results (BMI and body composition). Results 46 patients underwent bariatric procedures: 20 patients LRYGB and 26 patients SG. 21 patients preoperatively suffered from T2DM and 25 did not. Data concerning BMI and body composition were collected at baseline and 1- year follow-up in four subgroups of patients: obese non-diabetic patients (group 1) and obese diabetic patients (group 2) who underwent LRYGB, obese non-diabetic patients (group 3) and obese diabetic patients (group 4) who underwent Sleeve gastrectomy. At 1-year follow-up, fat mass and fat-free mass differences in percentage were statistically significant in each subgroup. There were no statistically significant differences as regards BMI, fat mass and fat-free mass percentages between subgroups 1 and 2 as there were, in contrast, between group 3 and 4. Conclusions bariatric surgery can induce good results in term of weight loss, reduction of fat mass as well as fat-free mass improvement. Obese diabetic patients submitted to Sleeve Gastrectomy have a worse improvement of fat mass and free-fat mass compared to non diabetic patients submitted to the same procedure
Laparoscopic reinforced sleeve gastrectomy: early results and complications
BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was pioneered as a two-stage intervention for super and super-super obesity to minimize morbidity and mortality; it is employed increasingly as a primary procedure. Early outcomes and integrity of laparoscopic SG (LSG) against leak using a technique incorporating gastric transection-line reinforcement were studied.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2009, 121 patients underwent LSG (16, two-stage; 105, primary). Of the patients, 66% were women, mean age 38.8 ± 10.9 (15.0-64.0), and body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) 48.7 ± 9.3 (33.7-74.8). Bovine pericardium (Peri-Strips Dry [PSD]) was used to reinforce the staple line. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used, as appropriate. The paired t test was used to assess change from baseline; bivariate analyses and logistic regression were used to identify preoperative patient characteristics predictive of suboptimal weight loss.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 105 min (95-180), and mean hospitalization was 5.6 days (1-14). There was no mortality. There were 6 (5.0%) complications: 1 intraoperative leak, 1 stricture, 1 trocar-site bleed, 1 renal failure, and 2 wound infections. There were no postoperative staple-line leaks. Following 15 concomitant hiatal hernia operations, 3 (20%) recurred: 1 revised to RYGB and 2 in standby. Two post-LSG hiatal hernias of the two-stage series required revisions because of symptoms. BMI decreased 24.7% at 6 months (n = 55) to 37.5 ± 9.3 (22.2-58.1); %EWL was 48.1 ± 19.3 (15.5-98.9). Twelve-month BMI (n = 41) was 38.4 ± 10.5 (19.3-62.3); %EWL was 51.7 ± 25.0 (8.9-123.3). Forty-eight-month BMI (n = 13) was 35.6 ± 6.8 (24.9-47.5); %EWL was 61.1 ± 12.2 (43.9-82.1) (p 70% of patients who experienced <50% EWL at 6 months. At 2 weeks, 100% of type 2 diabetes patients (n = 23) were off medication (mean HbA(1C), 5.9 ± 0.5%; glycemia, 90.0 ± 19.9 mg/dL (p < 0.01) at 3 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic PSD-reinforced LSG as a staged or definitive procedure is safe and effective in the short term and provides rapid type 2 diabetes mellitus reduction with a very low rate of complications
Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Retrospective Comparison.
BACKGROUND:
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are performed in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study is to evaluate retrospectively the clinical efficacy of RYGB and SG in two groups of obese T2DM patients.
METHODS:
From the hospital database, we extracted the clinical records of 31 obese T2DM patients, of whom 15 (7 F/8 M) had undergone laparoscopic SG (LSG) and 16 (7 F/9 M) laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) in the period 2005-2008. The groups were comparable for age (range 33-59 years) and BMI (range 38-57 kg/m(2)). LRYGB alimentary limb was 150 cm, and biliopancreatic limb was 150 cm from the Treitz ligament. LSG vertical transection was calibrated on a 40-Fr orogastric bougie. Data were analysed at 6, 12 and 18-24 months with reference to weight loss and remission of comorbidities.
RESULTS:
The reduction in body weight was comparable in the two groups. At 18-24 months the percent BMI reduction was 29 ± 8 and 33 ± 11 % in LSG and LRYGB, respectively. Percent excess weight loss was 53 ± 16 and 52 ± 19 % in LSG and LRYGB, respectively. Thirteen patients in LSG and 14 patients in LRYGB discontinued their hypoglycaemic medications. Five (55 %) patients in LSG and eight (89 %) in LRYGB discontinued antihypertensive drugs. Three out of five patients in LSG and one out of two patients in LRYGB withdrew lipid-lowering agents.
CONCLUSIONS:
LSG and LRYGB are equally effective in terms of weight loss and remission of obesity-related comorbidities. Controlled long-term comparisons are needed to establish the optimal procedure in relation to patients' characteristics
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
