1,721,567 research outputs found
Microdialysis - a model for studying chronic wounds
Microdialysis has been used for more than 20 years as a method of sampling the interstitial fluid space. It has been used in both animals and human tissues, in vivo. The principle of microdialysis is based on the passive diffusion of a compound along its concentration gradient. One major advantage of this sampling technique is that it is simple, relatively cheap, and minimally invasive. Consequently, microdialysis has been employed in a variety of research and clinical settings to recover endogenous molecules and metabolites from the tissue space. It has also been used to measure the tissue penetration of xenobiotics and to follow their temporal and spatial distribution. Most recently, microdialysis has begun to be used as a diagnostic tool and its application to clinical investigation at the bedside explored. This review describes the principles of the technique of microdialysis and its current uses in both an experimental and clinical setting. It goes on to consider current methods of wound fluid sampling and the range of bioactive molecules that have been detected in wound fluid recovered using these techniques. Finally, the use of microdialysis as a novel method for sampling wound fluid in vivo and its ability to provide a fluid that is unaffected by the sampling method and that is representative of the wound environment is discussed
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
A comparison of cutaneous vascular responses to transient pressure loading in smokers and nonsmokers
Smoking has been recognized as a risk factor for pressure ulcer development. This study investigated the hypothesis that smoking causes alterations in cutaneous vascular perfusion, which may contribute to this increased risk. With the use of the laser Doppler fluximetry (LDF), the adaptive vasodilatory response to a transient pressure load at the sacrum was measured in nine healthy female smokers and their age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and menstrual cycle matched nonsmoker controls. In all subjects, removal of the pressure load resulted in a reactive hyperaemic response. The total hyperaemic response was approximately 45% smaller in smokers compared to nonsmoker controls. The reduction was due to a shortening of the duration of the response predominantly through an increase in the rate of recovery from peak, which was twice as fast in the smokers (2.4 ± 1.7 AU ¥ seconds) compared with the nonsmoking controls (1.1 ± 0.9 AU ¥ seconds) (p < 0.005). We conclude that changes in the vascular responsiveness can be measured objectively at skin sites at risk of pressure ulcers. We have also shown that vascular responsiveness is altered in light smokers compared to control subjects. These preliminary data open the way for further investigation into the risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
