1,721,945 research outputs found
Niels C. Beck
No full textNiels C. Beck, Dean of Parks College (1948-53) [Image printed in 1949 Archive, p80
Niels C. Petersen
No full textSeries 328 | Board of Pardons | Prisoners' pardon application case files | Niels C. PetersenCase files consist of letters to the Governor, a formal application for a pardon, petitions and letters of support from the public and officials connected to the case. Cases illustrate the process of review by the board of cases of prisoners incarcerated in the Utah prison system to determine if they should be released before their regular sentence ended
Demythologizing and the Philosophia Perennis: Bultmann, Jaspers and Heidegger
No full textPaper by Dr. Niels C. Nielsen, Jr
A-1286: 234 West 300 North, Hyrum, Utah, Niels C. Jensen residence. Lots 2-3 Block 17 Plat C. 1930s
No full textA-1286: 234 West 300 North, Hyrum, Utah, Niels C. Jensen residence. Lots 2-3 Block 17 Plat C. 1930
Nielsen, Niels C., Jr., Fundamentalism, Mythos, and World Religions, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1993
No full textBastian Jean-Pierre. Nielsen, Niels C., Jr., Fundamentalism, Mythos, and World Religions, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1993. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 76e année n°1, Janvier-mars 1996. pp. 105-106
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
