1,608 research outputs found

    Software tools for implementing simulation studies in adaptive seamless designs : introducing R package ASD

    No full text
    Adaptive designs for clinical trials have the potential to improve the efficiency of clinical research by, for instance, seamlessly combining different stages of a clinical development programme

    Adaptive seamless clinical trials using early outcomes for treatment or subgroup selection : methods, simulation model and their implementation in R

    No full text
    Adaptive seamless designs combine confirmatory testing, a domain of phase III trials, with features such as treatment or subgroup selection, typically associated with phase II trials. They promise to increase the efficiency of development programmes of new drugs, for example, in terms of sample size and/or development time. It is well acknowledged that adaptive designs are more involved from a logistical perspective and require more upfront planning, often in the form of extensive simulation studies, than conventional approaches. Here, we present a framework for adaptive treatment and subgroup selection using the same notation, which links the somewhat disparate literature on treatment selection on one side and on subgroup selection on the other. Furthermore, we introduce a flexible and efficient simulation model that serves both designs. As primary endpoints often take a long time to observe, interim analyses are frequently informed by early outcomes. Therefore, all methods presented accommodate interim analyses informed by either the primary outcome or an early outcome. The R package asd, previously developed to simulate designs with treatment selection, was extended to include subgroup selection (so‐called adaptive enrichment designs). Here, we describe the functionality of the R package asd and use it to present some worked‐up examples motivated by clinical trials in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and oncology. The examples both illustrate various features of the R package and provide insights into the operating characteristics of adaptive seamless studies

    Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials with subgroup selection

    No full text
    Growing interest in stratified medicine is leading to increasing importance of subgroup analyses in confirmatory clinical trials. Conventionally, confirmatory clinical trials either focus on a subgroup identified in advance or assess subgroup effects once the trial is completed. The focus of this article is methodology for adaptive clinical trials that both identify whether a treatment is particularly effective in a predefined subgroup, potentially enabling alteration of recruitment, and assess the effectiveness in the subgroup and/or whole population. Methods for such adaptive trials are described and compared, and the logistical and regulatory issues associated with such approaches are discussed

    The influence of flow discharge variations on the morphodynamics of a diffluence-confluence unit on a large river

    No full text
    This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is freely available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.Bifurcations are key geomorphological nodes in anabranching and braided fluvial channels, controlling local bed morphology, the routing of sediment and water, and ultimately defining the stability of their associated diffluence–confluence unit. Recently, numerical modelling of bifurcations has focused on the relationship between flow conditions and the partitioning of sediment between the bifurcate channels. Herein, we report on field observations spanning September 2013 to July 2014 of the three-dimensional flow structure, bed morphological change and partitioning of both flow discharge and suspended sediment through a large diffluence–confluence unit on the Mekong River, Cambodia, across a range of flow stages (from 13 500 to 27 000 m3 s−1). Analysis of discharge and sediment load throughout the diffluence–confluence unit reveals that during the highest flows (Q = 27 000 m3 s−1), the downstream island complex is a net sink of sediment (losing 2600 ± 2000 kg s−1 between the diffluence and confluence), whereas during the rising limb (Q = 19 500 m3 s−1) and falling limb flows (Q = 13 500 m3 s−1) the sediment balance is in quasi-equilibrium. We show that the discharge asymmetry of the bifurcation varies with discharge and highlight that the influence of upstream curvature-induced water surface slope and bed morphological change may be first-order controls on bifurcation configuration. Comparison of our field data to existing bifurcation stability diagrams reveals that during lower (rising and falling limb) flow the bifurcation may be classified as unstable, yet transitions to a stable condition at high flows. However, over the long term (1959–2013) aerial imagery reveals the diffluence–confluence unit to be fairly stable. We propose, therefore, that the long-term stability of the bifurcation, as well as the larger channel planform and morphology of the diffluence–confluence unit, may be controlled by the dominant sediment transport regime of the system. © 2017 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Natural Environment Research Council. Grant Numbers: NE/JO21571/1, NE/JO21881/1, NE/JO21970/

    Correction : A conditional error function approach for subgroup selection in adaptive clinical trials

    No full text
    It has recently come to our attention that some of the results presented in Table II in ’A conditional error function approach for subgroup selection in adaptive clinical trials’ (Statistics in Medicine 2012; 31:4309–4320) are not correct. An R software coding issue resulted in numerical errors in the reported results for the conditional error function approach (CEF) and for the combination test approach by Spiessens and Debois (CT-SD). We have corrected these errors in the following table. We also, for reasons of consistency with the CEF approach, now present type I error rates for the CT-SD approach based purely on rejection of the intersection hypothesis inline image rather than as previously on rejection of both intersection and one or the other of the elementary hypotheses inline image and inline image. It is now clear that type I error rates are controlled at the nominal 2.5% level for both approaches, and our previous assertion that the CEF methodology was uniformly, although only marginally, more powerful than the CT-SD methodology is no longer supported by the simulation results for the selected scenarios. Correction of coding errors produced such small changes to data presented in Figures 1–3 as to be indistinguishable from normal simulation error; updated data underlying these plots are available on request from the authors. We apologize for any inconvenience this error has caused
    corecore