1,721,126 research outputs found

    Testing for the Supremacy of a Multinomial Cell Probability

    Full text link
    Tests for the supremacy of a multinomial cell probability are developed. The tested null hypothesis states that a particular cell of interest is not more probable than all others. Rejection of this null leads to the conclusion that the cell of interest has a strictly greater probability than all other cells. The null hypothesis constrains the multinomial probability vector to a nonconvex region that is a union of closed convex cones. The likelihood ratio test for this problem is derived and shown to be equivalent to an intersection–union test. The least favorable configuration of the multinomial probability vector in the null parameter space is derived, and the limiting null distribution of the test statistic that is stochastically greatest is shown to be a mixture of point mass at zero and a chi-square distribution with a single degree of freedom. Asymptotic and valid finite-sample testing procedures are proposed and examined via a simulation study and the analysis of two datasets. The proposed procedures are extended to test whether the cell with the largest observed frequency is uniquely most probable. An equivalence between a likelihood ratio test for this problem and a union–intersection test is demonstrated.This is a manuscript of an article published as Nettleton, Dan. "Testing for the supremacy of a multinomial cell probability." Journal of the American Statistical Association104, no. 487 (2009): 1052-1059. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08213. Posted with permission.</p

    Borrowing Information Across Genes and Experiments for Improved Error Variance Estimation in Microarray Data Analysis

    Full text link
    Statistical inference for microarray experiments usually involves the estimation of error variance for each gene. Because the sample size available for each gene is often low, the usual unbiased estimator of the error variance can be unreliable. Shrinkage methods, including empirical Bayes approaches that borrow information across genes to produce more stable estimates, have been developed in recent years. Because the same microarray platform is often used for at least several experiments to study similar biological systems, there is an opportunity to improve variance estimation further by borrowing information not only across genes but also across experiments. We propose a lognormal model for error variances that involves random gene effects and random experiment effects. Based on the model, we develop an empirical Bayes estimator of the error variance for each combination of gene and experiment and call this estimator BAGE because information is Borrowed Across Genes and Experiments. A permutation strategy is used to make inference about the differential expression status of each gene. Simulation studies with data generated from different probability models and real microarray data show that our method outperforms existing approaches.This article is published as Ji, Tieming; Liu, Peng; and Nettleton, Dan (2012) "Borrowing Information Across Genes and Experiments for Improved Error Variance Estimation in Microarray Data Analysis," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology: Vol. 11: Iss. 3, Article 12. doi: 10.1515/1544-6115.1806. Posted with permission.</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Estimating the number of true null hypotheses from a histogram of p values

    Full text link
    In an earlier article, an intuitively appealing method for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in a multiple test situation was proposed. That article presented an iterative algorithm that relies on a histogram of observed p values to obtain the estimator. We characterize the limit of that iterative algorithm and show that the estimator can be computed directly without iteration. We compare the performance of the histogram-based estimator with other procedures for estimating the number of true null hypotheses from a collection of observed p values and find that the histogram-based estimator performs well in settings similar to those encountered in microarray data analysis. We demonstrate the approach using p values from a large microarray experiment aimed at uncovering molecular mechanisms of barley resistance to a fungal pathogen.This article is published as Nettleton, Dan, JT Gene Hwang, Rico A. Caldo, and Roger P. Wise. "Estimating the number of true null hypotheses from a histogram of p values." Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics 11, no. 3 (2006): 337. doi: 10.1198/108571106X129135.</p

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore