1,720,973 research outputs found
Champagne-Ardenne
Neiss Robert. Champagne-Ardenne. In: Gallia, tome 43, fascicule 2, 1985. pp. 357-377
Reims (Marne). Cathédrale
Neiss Robert. Reims (Marne). Cathédrale. In: Archéologie médiévale, tome 25, 1995. p. 259
Reims (Marne). Cathédrale
Berry Walter, Neiss Robert. Reims (Marne). Cathédrale. In: Archéologie médiévale, tome 27, 1997. p. 205
La structure urbaine de Reims antique et son évolution du Ier au III* siècle ap. J.C
Neiss Robert. La structure urbaine de Reims antique et son évolution du Ier au III* siècle ap. J.C. In: Revue archéologique de Picardie, n°3-4, 1984. Les villes de la Gaule Belgique au Haut-Empire. pp. 171-191
Reims (Marne). Le groupe archiépiscopal
Neiss Robert, Berry Walter. Reims (Marne). Le groupe archiépiscopal. In: Archéologie médiévale, tome 26, 1996. pp. 254-255
Reims (Marne). Le groupe archiépiscopal
Neiss Robert, Berry Walter. Reims (Marne). Le groupe archiépiscopal. In: Archéologie médiévale, tome 26, 1996. pp. 254-255
Préface
Blanchet Jean-Claude, Neiss Robert. Préface. In: Revue archéologique de Picardie, n°1-2, 1990. La peinture murale romaine dans les provinces du Nord. p. 5
Préface
Blanchet Jean-Claude, Neiss Robert. Préface. In: Revue archéologique de Picardie, n°1-2, 1990. La peinture murale romaine dans les provinces du Nord. p. 5
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
