1,720,960 research outputs found
Uloptera undetermined
No full textUloptera sp. Uloptera sp. is listed from Benin (Le Gall 2015) and is most likely Uloptera burgeoni (Bourgoin, 1921), since this is the most widespread species and is known from Ivory Coast, Ghana, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Gabon (Schoolmeesters 2021).Published as part of Philips, T. Keith, Mudge, Alan D., Orozco, Jesus, Neidlinger, Robert, Beinhundner, Gerhard & Joly, Claude, 2022, A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae), pp. 151-188 in Zootaxa 5150 (2) on page 178, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/662115
FIGURE 12 in A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae)
No full textFIGURE 12. Species overlap among Ghana, Ivory Coast, and Benin as well as the number of unique species in each country. Size of circles are proportional to the number of species in each country compared to Ghana, not just the number of species total.Published as part of Philips, T. Keith, Mudge, Alan D., Orozco, Jesus, Neidlinger, Robert, Beinhundner, Gerhard & Joly, Claude, 2022, A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae), pp. 151-188 in Zootaxa 5150 (2) on page 179, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/662115
Niphobleta squamipes
No full textNiphobleta squamipes (Gerstaecker, 1883) This species has previously been reported from Ghana (Joly 2001; Mudge et al. 2012). However, after further study, Joly (2018) listed this species as Niphobleta kraatzi (Kolbe, 1892) in place of N. squamipes (confirmed by P. Antoine and C. Joly, personal communication, August 2018). Hence, we do not include N. squamipes as part of Ghana’s fauna until this record can be verified. Five or six species of Niphobleta are currently recognized including three from Ghana: N. dominula Kraatz, 1880, N. kraatzi, Kolbe, 1892, and N. niveosparsa (Kraatz, 1880) (Beinhundner 2017).Published as part of Philips, T. Keith, Mudge, Alan D., Orozco, Jesus, Neidlinger, Robert, Beinhundner, Gerhard & Joly, Claude, 2022, A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae), pp. 151-188 in Zootaxa 5150 (2) on page 178, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/662115
Fornasinius higginsi
No full textFornasinius higginsi (Westwood, 1874) Maquart & Malec (2017) mention Goliathus (Fornasinius) higginsi, as being reported from Ghana in Mudge et al. (2012), but this citation is incorrect. Fornasinius higginsi, however, is recorded from Ghana in Beinhundner (2017) and is known from the Eastern and Western regions (D. Moore, M. De Palma, personal communication). The other Fornasinius species known from Ghana, F. klingbeili Zöller, Fiebig & Schulze, 1995 is known from the Eastern and Volta Regions as well as neighboring Togo, where the larvae were collected in hyrax (Afrotheria: Hyracoidea) middens (Maquart & Malec 2017).Published as part of Philips, T. Keith, Mudge, Alan D., Orozco, Jesus, Neidlinger, Robert, Beinhundner, Gerhard & Joly, Claude, 2022, A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae), pp. 151-188 in Zootaxa 5150 (2) on page 178, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/662115
FIGURE 5. A in A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae)
No full textFIGURE 5. A. Leucocelis (Amauroleucocelis) brunneipennis (Moser, 1912). B–C. Leucocelis (Amauroleucocelis) decellei Ruter, 1969. D–E. Leucocelis (Amauroleucocelis) intermedia Antoine, 1987. F–G. Leucocelis (Amauroleucocelis) maraisi Antoine, 1987. H–I. Leucocelis (Amauroleucocelis) septicollis (Schaum, 1848). J. Oxythyrea (Stichothyrea) guttifera (Afzelius, 1817). K. Oxythyrea (Stichothyrea) picticollis Kraatz, 1882. L. Oxythyrea (Oxythyrea) petiti (Gory & Percheron, 1833). M–N. Paralleucosma glycyphanoides dives Antoine, 1989. O. Arielina strigifrons (Moser, 1911). P. Coenochilus calcaratus Westwood, 1874. Q. Coenochilus cf. regalis Bourgoin, 1929. R. Coenochilus costipennis (Moser, 1913). S. Coenochilus delkeskampi Schein, 1954. T. Coenochilus impressus (Moser, 1911).Published as part of Philips, T. Keith, Mudge, Alan D., Orozco, Jesus, Neidlinger, Robert, Beinhundner, Gerhard & Joly, Claude, 2022, A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae), pp. 151-188 in Zootaxa 5150 (2) on page 163, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/662115
Oxythyrea scintillans
No full textOxythyrea scintillans (Janson, 1907) A reference to this taxon listed in Fédière et al. (1989) from the Ivory Coast has not been found and is not included in Table 4. As this species is absent from the catalogs of Schenkling (1921), Krajčík (1998, 1999) and Schoolmeesters (2021), we believe it is in error.As further evidence, Janson did publish two papers in 1907 (Janson 1907a,b) but this species was not included in either one. Therefore, this record most likely refers to Acrothyrea scintillans (De Lisle, 1947) which is known from the Ivory Coast (Beinhundner 2017; Moretto & Rojkoff 2021).Published as part of Philips, T. Keith, Mudge, Alan D., Orozco, Jesus, Neidlinger, Robert, Beinhundner, Gerhard & Joly, Claude, 2022, A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae), pp. 151-188 in Zootaxa 5150 (2) on page 178, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/662115
FIGURE 2. A–C in A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae)
No full textFIGURE 2. A–C. Pachnoda concolor Schürhoff, 1938. D–F. Pachnoda cordata cordata (Drury, 1773). G–I. Pachnoda cordata tigris (Herbst, 1790). J–K. Pachnoda Fédièrei Rigout, 1989. L. Pachnoda marginata aurantia (Herbst, 1790). M–O. Pachnoda marginata cerandei Rigout, 1984. P–R. Pachnoda marginata marginata Drury, 1773. (P: female, Q: male) S. Pachnoda meloui Bourgoin, 1915. T. Pachnoda nigritarsis Harold, 1880.Published as part of Philips, T. Keith, Mudge, Alan D., Orozco, Jesus, Neidlinger, Robert, Beinhundner, Gerhard & Joly, Claude, 2022, A rich and diverse fauna: an illustrated guide to the cetoniines of Ghana with comparisons to Ivory Coast and Benin (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae), pp. 151-188 in Zootaxa 5150 (2) on page 160, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/662115
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
