1,720,988 research outputs found
Reply from authors: Right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits for truncus arteriosus repair: Let's shift the focus
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA): Which measurements are accurate and reliable?
Background
The variation and accuracy of computed tomography angiography (CTA) features of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) have not been completely characterized. We evaluated anomalous right (AAORCA) and left (AAOLCA) coronary arteries by CTA, with an emphasis on reproducibility, comparison with surgical measurements, and effect of nitroglycerin.
Methods
CTAs were interpreted for location of coronary origin & exit from the aorta, course, and dominance; minor & major diameters of the proximal & distal coronaries; shape of orifice; and intramural length. Relationships between vessel measurements, body surface area (BSA), and nitroglycerin use were evaluated. Comparisons between CTA and surgical measurements included intramural length, surgical probe size pre-intervention vs. CTA proximal AAOCA diameter, and surgical probe size post-intervention vs. CTA distal AAOCA diameter.
Results
Of 104 patients [81 (78%) AAORCA], all but 1 were intramural. Compared to AAOLCA, AAORCA patients were more likely to have a high origin (91% vs. 31%, p < 0.01), and slit-like orifice (58% vs. 26%, p < 0.01). When CTAs with nitroglycerin were compared to those without, no difference in proximal AAOCA dimensions was identified; however distal AAOCA and normal-origin coronary dimensions were larger in scans with nitroglycerin. Aside from slit-like orifice, reliability of coronary CTA measurements, including proximal AAOCA minor diameter and intramural length, was moderate to good between readers. In a subgroup of 54 patients, proximal AAOCA minor diameter and intramural length had good agreement and correlation with surgery.
Conclusion
Proximal AAOCA dimensions and intramural length are reproducible variables. The lack of difference in proximal AAOCA dimensions with nitroglycerin may reflect abnormal vessel mechanics. Multicenter studies are an important next step in understanding the generalizability of our findings
Aortic Valve Surgery After Neonatal Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Congenital Aortic Stenosis
Background:We sought to identify predictive factors for aortic valve (AoV) surgery after neonatal balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and characterize clinical outcomes of AoV surgery after neonatal BAV.Methods:Time-to-event analysis identified predictors for AoV surgery after neonatal BAV. Clinical outcomes of AoV surgery following neonatal BAV were examined.Results:This study included 96 consecutive patients who underwent neonatal BAV for congenital aortic stenosis between 1998 and 2018, in 26 of whom a fetal BAV had been performed. Fifty-six patients underwent AoV surgery at a median age of 2.0 years. Significant risk factors for AoV surgery in univariate Cox regression (result presented as hazard ratio [HR], [95% CI]; P value) were a history of fetal BAV (HR, 4.05 [95% CI, 2.19-7.40]; P<0.001), AoV annulus diameter Z score (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.43-0.75]; P=0.001), the presence of endocardial fibroelastosis (HR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.48-4.51]; P=0.001), severe left ventricular dysfunction before neonatal BAV (HR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.03-2.97]; P=0.04), and recent era (HR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.68-5.91]; P=0.0002) in the entire cohort. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden J index analysis identified a cutoff value for AoV annulus diameter Z score of -2.6 in patients without fetal BAV. In 24 patients with midterm cardiac catheterization data, univariate linear regression analysis (result presented as B coefficient [95% CI]; P) showed that the presence of greater-than-moderate aortic regurgitation immediately after BAV (B coefficient, 4.8 [95% CI, 1.0-8.6]; P=0.018) and before AoV surgery (B coefficient, 6.1 [95% CI, 2.2-10.0]; P=0.004) were significant risk factors for elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after AoV surgery, while concomitant endocardial fibroelastosis resection at AoV surgery had a protective effect (B coefficient, -3.8 [95% CI, -7.6 to -0.06]; P=0.05).Conclusions:A small AoV annulus diameter Z score with a cutoff value of -2.6 and a history of fetal BAV were significantly associated with AoV surgery after neonatal BAV. Concomitant endocardial fibroelastosis resection is recommended at AoV surgery following neonatal BAV to improve left ventricular diastolic function
- …
