1,720,961 research outputs found
The abnormal red-cell oxalate transport is a risk factor for idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a prospective study.
No full textAn abnormal erythrocyte transmembrane oxalate flux was described in recurrent idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis, To verify whether it might represent a risk marker of renal stone disease, two prospective studies were carried out, One hundred ninety patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis who were enrolled at their first episode of lithiasis during the period 1984 to 1986, form the basis of the first prospective study. The impact of erythrocyte oxalate transport anomaly, gender, familial occurrence of nephrolithiasis, hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, and hyperuricosuria on stone recurrence by both bivariate and multivariate analysis of frequencies was assessed. The predictive value of the erythrocyte anomaly for a patient's becoming a stone former was also assessed in five nephrolithiasic families. Recurrence occurred in 57.9% of patients; this was significantly associated with the erythrocyte anomaly, hyperoxaluria, and male gender, However, when using multivariate analysis, only gender and the erythrocyte anomaly were statistically significant and were independent predictors of recurrency, The probability of stone recurrency predicted by the logistic model ranged from 30.1% for women with normal erythrocyte oxalate transport, to 73.4% for men with the erythrocyte anomaly, The family follow-up showed that only subjects with the erythrocyte abnormality become renal stone-formers in the 8-yr survey. By showing the predictive value of the erythrocyte oxalate anomaly for recurrent calcium nephrolithiasis, our findings support the notion that this anomaly is a risk factor in renal stone disease
The hypercalciuric effect of PGE2 in nephrolithiasic patients is mediated by inhibition of Na-K-Cl co-transport activity.
No full text
The abnormal red-cell oxalate transport is a risk factor for idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a prospective study.
No full textAn abnormal erythrocyte transmembrane oxalate flux was described in recurrent idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis. To verify whether it might represent a risk marker of renal stone disease, two prospective studies were carried out. One hundred ninety patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis who were enrolled at their first episode of lithiasis during the period 1984 to 1986, form the basis of the first prospective study. The impact of erythrocyte oxalate transport anomaly, gender, familial occurrence of nephrolithiasis, hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, and hyperuricosuria on stone recurrence by both bivariate and multivariate analysis of frequencies was assessed. The predictive value of the erythrocyte anomaly for a patient's becoming a stone former was also assessed in five nephrolithiasis families. Recurrence occurred in 57.9% of patients; this was significantly associated with the erythrocyte anomaly, hyperoxaluria, and male gender. However, when using multivariate analysis, only gender and the erythrocyte anomaly were statistically significant and were independent predictors of recurrency. The probability of stone recurrency predicted by the logistic model ranged from 30.1% for women with normal erythrocyte oxalate transport, to 73.4% for men with the erythrocyte anomaly. The family follow-up showed that only subjects with the erythrocyte abnormality become renal stone-formers in the 8-yr survey. By showing the predictive value of the erythrocyte oxalate anomaly for recurrent calcium nephrolithiasis, our findings support the notion that this anomaly is a risk factor in renal stone disease
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
