1,720,973 research outputs found
Laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis with or without ileostomy: past, present and future of management of perforated diverticulitis
No abstract available
Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival
Background: In right-sided colon cancer surgery, currently there is a great deal of discussion and debate regarding complete mesocolic excision (CME) versus conventional right hemicolectomy (CRH) on postoperative outcomes and oncological results. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the short- and long-term outcomes of CME to standardize surgical approach in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Methods: A systematic review was performed examining available data on randomized and non-randomized studies evaluating the role of CME and D3 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Results: After literature search, 919 studies have been recorded, 110 studies underwent full-text reviews and 30 studies met inclusion criteria. The total number of CME procedures was 5931. Postoperative complications was reported in 28 studies with pooled overall complications of 1.88% for CME surgery. Six studies reported 0% of overall postoperative complications and they demonstrated a low incidence of complications following CME procedure. Anastomotic leak was reported in 27 studies with pooled proportion of 0.92% after CME resections. There were 16 papers reporting overall survival following CME procedure, with a mean of 85% of patients survived at 5 years. Mean 5-year overall survival was 93.05% in stage I patients, 89.76% in stage II patients and 79.65% in stage III patients. Local and distant recurrence were included in 21 studies, reporting tumor recurrence rate of 12.25% following CME. 5-year tumor recurrence was 5.8% in stage I patients, 7.68% in stage II patients and 15.69% in stage III patients. Conclusions: CME does not increase the risk of postoperative complications and significantly improves the long-term oncological impact. Prospective multicentre studies results are needed to verify if CME could be considered standard surgery for right colon cancer
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Intravenous omeprazole versus intravenous ranitidine in the treatment of bleeding duodenal ulcer: A prospective randomized trial
This prospective randomized trial compares the results of i.v. omeprazole and i.v. ranitidine in 45 patients admitted as an emergency with an endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding duodenal ulcer. The patients were randomized to receive i.v. omeprazole, 40 mg bolus followed by 80 mg/day by continuous infusion for 3 days (group A), or ranitidine 50 mg i.v. bolus followed by 400 mg/day i.v. continuous infusion for 3 days (group B). Follow-up endoscopy on day 4 demonstrated successful therapy, except when more than 4 units of blood/day had to be transfused to maintain hemoglobin level above 10 g/l. Bleeding stopped in 20/21 patients in group A (95.2%), and in 17/24 patients in group B (70.80%) (p < 0.05). From the results of the study, it can be concluded that intravenous omeprazole seems to be effective in the control of bleeding duodenal ulcer
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. An extrapancreatic loco-regional site and a review of the literature
Background: Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPT) of the pancreas are rare, low malignancy and predominantly affect young women, but it may be locally aggressive. Pancreatic resection is the main treatment for SPTs. However, low malignancy SPT may give insidious extrapancreatic invasions.
Case report: A 20-year-old woman was admitted with non-specific abdominal pain and diarrhea. A 9-cm SPT of the pancreas was discovered with extra-pancreatic invasion of the left adrenal gland and the spleen, in close contact with the body-tail of the pancreas, proximal portion of the jejunum, splenic flexure of the colon and the gastric fundus, with no signs of infiltration. For the young patient, a pancreas-preserving tumor excision was performed, with en-bloc resection of the spleen and adrenal gland, lymphadenectomy of the splenic vessels (13 lymph-nodes) and pre-pancreatic lymph node dissection, with no need for distal pancreatectomy. The duration of the surgery was 145 min, with no transfusion. The woman's postoperative course was complicated by a splenic lodge abscess treated via CT-guided percutaneous drainage, and a left pleural effusion treated medically, with a hospital stay of 16 days. Histology confirmed the diagnosis of a 9- cm low-grade SPT of the pancreas. In a close follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic 21 months later, with no tumor recurrence and good health.
Conclusions: Low-grade SPT of the pancreas with extra-pancreatic invasion of loco-regional organs can be treated by a pancreas-preserving approach to avoid a pancreatectomy. Moreover, still few cases of extra-pancreatic SPT are reported in the literature and there is an urgent need for more relevant evidence
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
