1,721,115 research outputs found
Musto, C W, 406149
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/407075Surname: MUSTO. Given Name(s) or Initials: C W. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 406149. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 41200.243141
Item: [2016.0049.39350] "Musto, C W, 406149
Harnessing distributional semantics to build context-aware justifications for recommender systems
Full text linkThis paper introduces a methodology to generate review-based natural language justifications supporting personalized suggestions returned by a recommender system. The hallmark of our strategy lies in the fact that natural language justifications are adapted to the different contextual situations in which the items will be consumed. In particular, our strategy relies on the following intuition: Just like the selection of the most suitable item is influenced by the contexts of usage, a justification that supports a recommendation should vary as well. As an example, depending on whether a person is going out with her friends or her family, a justification that supports a restaurant recommendation should include different concepts and aspects. Accordingly, we designed a pipeline based on distributional semantics models to generate a vector space representation of each context. Such a representation, which relies on a term-context matrix, is used to identify the most suitable review excerpts that discuss aspects that are particularly relevant for a certain context. The methodology was validated by means of two user studies, carried out in two different domains (i.e., movies and restaurants). Moreover, we also analyzed whether and how our justifications impact on the perceived transparency of the recommendation process and allow the user to make more informed choices. As shown by the results, our intuitions were supported by the user studies
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Generating post hoc review-based natural language justifications for recommender systems
Full text linkIn this article, we present a framework to build post hoc natural language justifications that supports the suggestions generated by a recommendation algorithm. Our methodology is based on the intuition that reviews’ excerpts contain much relevant information that can be used to justify a recommendation; thus, we propose a black-box explanation strategy that takes as input a recommended item and a set of reviews and builds as output a post hoc natural language justification which is completely independent of the underlying recommendation model. To validate our claims, we also introduce three different implementations of our conceptual framework: the first one uses natural language processing and sentiment analysis techniques to identify relevant and distinguishing aspects discussed in the reviews and combines reviews’ excerpts mentioning these aspects in a natural language justification which is presented to the target user. The second implementation extends the first one by introducing automatic aspect extraction and text summarization, which are exploited to generate a unique synthesis presenting the main characteristics of the item that is used as justification. Finally, the third implementation tackles the problem of generating a context-aware justification, that is to say, a justification that differs on varying of the different contextual situations, by automatically learning a lexicon for each contextual setting and by using such a lexicon to diversify the justifications. In the experimental evaluation, we carried out three user studies in different domains, and the results showed that our methodology is able to make the recommendation process more transparent, engaging and trustful for the users, thus confirming the validity of the intuitions behind this work
XAI.it 2022 - Preface to the Third Italian Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Full text linkArtificial Intelligence systems are increasingly playing an increasingly important role in our daily lives. As their importance in our everyday lives grows, it is fundamental that the internal mechanisms that guide these algorithms are as clear as possible. It is not by chance that the recent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) emphasized the users’ right to explanation when people face artificial intelligence-based technologies. Unfortunately, the current research tends to go in the opposite direction, since most of the approaches try to maximize the effectiveness of the models (e.g., recommendation accuracy) at the expense of the explainability and the transparency. The main research questions which arise from this scenario is straightforward: how can we deal with such a dichotomy between the need for effective adaptive systems and the right to transparency and interpretability? Several research lines are triggered by this question: building transparent intelligent systems, analyzing the impact of opaque algorithms on final users, studying the role of explanation strategies, investigating how to provide users with more control in the behavior of intelligent systems. XAI.it, the Italian workshop on Explainable AI, tries to address these research lines and aims to provide a forum for the Italian community to discuss problems, challenges and innovative approaches in the various sub-fields of XAI
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
