5 research outputs found
PENJABATAN NON-MUSLIM PADA JABATAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA DALAM PANDANGAN HUKUM ISLAM:
No full textPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pendapat ulama kontemporer tentang hukum penjabatan non-muslim pada jabatan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) di sistem pemerintahan republik dan memberikan prefensi dari pendapat-pendapat mereka, kemudian mengimplementasikan hukum tersebut di dalam konteks Indonesia. Beberapa dari kalangan ulama Islam menyamakan DPR di dalam sistem demokrasi dengan Majelis Syuro dalam sistem pemerintahan islam, sedangkan kalangan ulama di pihak lain berpendapat DPR dalam demokrasi dan Majelis Syuro dalam sistem pemerintahan islam memiliki prinsip-prinsip yang berbeda. Perbedaan paradigma ini menyebabkan perbedaan mereka dalam menjawab pertanyaan: apakah boleh non-muslim menjabat jabatan DPR di negara dengan mayoritas muslim? Bagi kalangan ulama yang menganggap DPR dan Majelis Syuro adalah dua entitas yang sama mereka berpendapat tidak boleh bagi non-muslim untuk menjabat jabatan DPR karena jabatan itu termasuk dalam kekuasaan umum (al-wilayah al-‘amah) yang tidak boleh dilimpahkan kepada non-muslim, sedangkan bagi kalangan yang menganggap DPR dan Majelis Syuro adalah dua entitas yang berbeda meskipun memiliki beberapa kemiripan berpendapat boleh bagi non-muslim untuk menjabat jabatan DPR karena jabatan itu bukan termasuk kekuasaan umum (al-wilayah al-‘ammah). Setelah menelaah dalil-dalil dari kedua belah pihak dan menganalisis bantahan setiap dalil yang diajukan kedua belah pihak, peneliti lebih condong kepada pendapat yang melarang non-Muslim untuk menjabat DPR di negara muslim khususnya Indonesia
Muslim Societies, Civil and Political Rights, and The Guarantee of Religious Freedom: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Turkiye Constitutions
No full textUntil the middle of the 20th century, many Muslim population countries became free and independent countries following the end of world colonization. Those countries try to adopt several modern political and legal values, including establishing democracy and state constitutions. One of the constitution's contents in a democratic country is guaranteeing and strengthening civil and political rights. Civil and political rights regulation should be written in a partial part of the constitution as a commitment to live in modern democratic circumstances. Philosophically, citizens' civil and political rights in democratic circumstances cannot be restricted by government. Nevertheless, a gap in the legal argument regarding the limitation of civil and political rights in constitutions is constantly discussed. This article looks at civil and political rights limitations in two cases in different countries: Indonesia and Turkiye. These two countries were chosen as subjective data based on the legal system's proximity pattern and socio-religious conditions. Both countries are also close to the civil law system and have historical references to Islam. In addition, both countries have experience with the restriction of religious organizations. Indonesia has dealt with the restriction of Hizbut Tahrir Movement. Meanwhile Turkiye has experience in banning Gulen Movement. By this background, some questions emerge: How do Indonesian and Turkish constitutions, as Muslim population countries, guarantee human rights issues? By using a comparative legal study and a sociological-empirical approach, this article compares the Indonesian and Turkiye constitutions to see how the two countries guarantee human rights, predominantly civil and political rights. The result of this article reveals that national consensus, national security, stability, and legitimate political power are some of the legal arguments that are always present in the discourse on restrictions on human rights. Under these conditions, human rights restrictions are commonly regulated in the constitution, which contains human rights laws
Larangan Kawin Mojok bagi Pasangan Calon Pengantin Perspektif ‘Urf
No full textMojok marriage is a marriage that is prohibited among the people of Tamansari Village, the people of Tamansari Village believe that when the mojok marriage is forced to be carried out, there is a disaster or disaster that befalls the bride and groom's family, based on this maslah researchers conduct research with the aim of studying and describing the views of the people of Tamansari Village regarding the Prohibition of Mojok Marriage, as well as Review 'urf against Mojok Marriage in Tamansari Village. The method used empirically (field Research) and qualitative approaches that produce qualitative descriptive data, the author in determining respondents using the purposive sampling method in the way that people are considered to know best what we expect. data in the field researchers use the interview method Researchers in analyzing a problem using the theory of analysis 'Urf or custom. The results of the prohibition research are the legacy of the ancestors, and the prohibition deserves to be obeyed because the prohibition is also for the good of the child and the household, in addition to being a society is also neutral about the ban, because every thing depends on each other's beliefs. In terms of the various 'urf is included in the category of al-'urf fi'li (Habits in the form of deeds), when viewed from its scope, it is classified as 'urf khas (special tradition), when viewed in terms of acceptance and rejection it can enter the 'urf that is shahih and it can also enter the 'urf that is fasi
Larangan Kawin Mojok bagi Pasangan Calon Pengantin Perspektif ‘Urf: Desa Tamansari Kecamatan Wuluhan Kabupaten Jember
No full textMojok marriage is a marriage that is prohibited among the people of Tamansari Village, the people of Tamansari Village believe that when the mojok marriage is forced to be carried out, there is a disaster or disaster that befalls the bride and groom\u27s family, based on this maslah researchers conduct research with the aim of studying and describing the views of the people of Tamansari Village regarding the Prohibition of Mojok Marriage, as well as Review \u27urf against Mojok Marriage in Tamansari Village. The method used empirically (field Research) and qualitative approaches that produce qualitative descriptive data, the author in determining respondents using the purposive sampling method in the way that people are considered to know best what we expect. data in the field researchers use the interview method Researchers in analyzing a problem using the theory of analysis \u27Urf or custom. The results of the prohibition research are the legacy of the ancestors, and the prohibition deserves to be obeyed because the prohibition is also for the good of the child and the household, in addition to being a society is also neutral about the ban, because every thing depends on each other\u27s beliefs. In terms of the various \u27urf is included in the category of al-\u27urf fi\u27li (Habits in the form of deeds), when viewed from its scope, it is classified as \u27urf khas (special tradition), when viewed in terms of acceptance and rejection it can enter the \u27urf that is shahih and it can also enter the \u27urf that is fasi
AMIN AL-KHULI: RÂID TAJDÎD AL-BALÂGHAH FÎ AL-ASHR AL-HADÎTS
No full textThis research aims to uncover the names of thinkers who encourage the renewal of Balaghah (Arabic Islamic Rethoric), as well as to find the pioneer of the renewal of Balaghah in modern era. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The author takes data from Munir Muhammad Kholil Nida\u27s dissertation (1980), and other references related to the title of the discussion. Among the results of this study, it is known that Munir mentioned important names who are considered the pioneers of Balaghah reform in modern times, including: Ahmad Badawi, Mustafa Amin and Ali Jarim, Abdul Aziz Basyari, Anis Al-Maqdisi, Ali Al-Umari, Abdu Ar-Razaq Muhyiddin, Amin Al-Khuli, and Ahmad As-Syaib. And the most important pioneers of reform among them were Amin Al-Khuli and Ahmad As-Syaib. Because both of them made a special book on the principles of their renewal ideas. And Amin Al-Khuli is considered superior to Ahmad As-Syaib with a logical division of titles, and the ability to provide satisfactory explanations in the selection of titles in the new Balaghah concept
