1,720,988 research outputs found
Pituitary Gland Development: An Update
The embryonic development of the pituitary gland involves a complex and highly spatio- temporally regulated network of integrating signalling molecules and transcription factors. Genetic mutations in any of these factors can lead to congenital hypopituitarism in association with a wide spectrum of craniofacial/midline defects ranging from incompatibility with life to holoprosencephaly (HPE) and cleft palate and septo- optic dysplasia (SOD). Increasing evidence supports a genotypic overlap with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadal disorders such as Kallmann syndrome, which is consistent with the known overlap in phenotypes between these disorders. This chapter reviews the cascade of events leading up to the successful development of the pituitary gland and to highlight key areas where genetic variations can occur thus leading to congenital hypopituitarism and associated defects
[What is the value of determining immunoreactive GHRH in acromegaly?]
Acromegaly is usually due to autonomous, excessive secretion of growth hormone from a pituitary adenoma. One would expect growth hormone-releasing factor (GHRH) in these patients to be suppressed. In the available literature referring to acromegaly, immunoreactive GHRH levels were determined in 259 acromegalic patients. When growth hormone was measured simultaneously, no correlation was found between serum growth hormone and plasma GHRH concentrations, irrespective of whether the acromegalic patients were treated or not. A possible explanation for this finding might be the lack of a feedback regulation between plasma growth hormone and GHRH. Also, since growth hormone is secreted in a pulsatile fashion the interpretation of single growth hormone values can be difficult. IGF I, which correlates well with mean growth hormone production, may therefore represent a more valuable criterion for the assessment of activity and GHRH plasma levels in acromegalics. However, no study has yet been performed to elucidate the relationship between GHRH and IGF I in acromegaly. To examine this relationship we measured the concentration of plasma GHRH and IGF I in 18 treated patients with acromegaly (age range 32-64 years median 50.5 years; median follow-up 6.5 years, range 3 months to 33 years). All immunoreactive GHRH levels were within the limits described as normal in the literature (mean +/- SD 22.89 +/- 2.72 pg/ml, range 19-28 pg/ml). The IGFI level was 396.78 +/- 224.26 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, range 71-876 ng/ml; reference ranges, age group 25-39 years: 114-492 ng/ml; 40-54 years: 90-360 ng/ml; > 55 years: 71-290 ng/ml). We found no correlation between IGF I and GHRH concentrations (r = 0.17). We therefore conclude that measuring plasma GHRH is not useful in the evaluation of the activity or therapy of acromegaly but may be helpful in its differential diagnosis since a massive elevation of GHRH is typically associated with the ectopic GHRH syndrome, a rare cause of acromegaly
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Agreement between HbA1c measured by DCA 2000 and by HPLC: effects of fetal hemoglobin concentrations
In subjects with type 1 diabetes, persisting elevations of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) have been demonstrated. This study evaluated whether HbF levels typically seen in type 1 diabetes (up to 3%) interfere with glycohemoglobin determinations using a common immunologic method (DCA 2000)
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
