1,721,005 research outputs found
Aktivitas Dakwah ustadzah Qudsi Alawiyyah Mukhyar di Kota Banjarmasin Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan
Get PDFDakwah merupakan ajakan atau seruan yang digunakan untuk mengajak kepada
perorangan atau kelompok untuk mengikuti ajaran Islam dan mengamalkan nilai-nilai yang
terkandung didalam agama tersebut.Sekian banyak da'i/ da'iyyah yang menjalankan misi dakwah
Rasulullah Saw. salah satu diantaranya adalah ustadzah Qudsi Alawiyyah Mukhyar. Hasil
observasi dan wawancara singkat peneliti dengan mad’u menyatakan bahwa ustadzah Qudsi
dikenal dengan suara yang khas dalam melantunkan sholawat puji-pujian, pembacaan Ratib alHaddad
dan
Al-Athos
dan
mudah dipahami
dalam
penyampaian
pesan-pesan
dakwah.
Penelitian ini memfokuskan tentang aktivitas dakwah ustadzah Qudsi Alawiyyah
Mukhyar di kota Banjaramsin. Bertujuan untuk mengetahui aktivitas dakwah ustadzah Qudsi,
metode apa saja yang ustadzah Qudsi terapkan dalam aktivitas dakwahnya, adakah faktor
penghambat dari aktivitas tersebut dan bagaimana cara mengatasinya. Lokasi penelitian yang
bertempat dikota Banjarmasin. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian kualitatif. Adapun
subjek penelitian adalah ustadzah Qudsi Alawiyyah Mukhyar. Dengan menggunakan beberapa
teknik dalam pengumpulan data, yaitu obeservasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi melalui sumber
informan.
Dari hasil penelitian bahwa aktivitas dakwah ustadzah Qudsi Alawiyyah Mukhyar
meliputi: pembimbing wisata religi, majelis taklim, majelis sholawat, konsultasi atau bimbingan
konseling, ceramah agama, dan penulis. Metode dakwah ustadzah Qudsi yang diterapkan
meliputi metode ceramah, diskusi, dan konseling.Faktor penghambat pelaksanaan dakwah
ustadzah Qudsi yakni ekonomi, Kurangnya manajemen pengelolaan majelis yang baik berkaitan
dengan konsumsi maupun fasilitas lainnya, sebagaimana berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan dakwah,
kurangnya loyalitas dan adab yang dimiliki oleh mad’u, belum adanya donatur tetap dalam
memperlancar kegiatan aktivitas dakwah ustadzah Qudsi, dan mad’u mudah terpengaruh oleh
lingkungan. Adapun cara ustadzah Qudsi mengatasi permasalahan tersebut dengan memberikan
pemahaman kepada mad’u tentang adab-adab
RESEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP AYAT-AYAT AL-QUR’AN PADA PROSESI RUQYAH DI PONDOK PESANTREN BANI MUKHYAR DI KABUPATEN KUNINGAN
Get PDFProsesi ruqyah merupakan prosesi penyembuhan dalam Islam yang
berhubungan dengan hati dan jiwa seseorang. Prosesi tersebut biasanya
digunakan peruqyah dengan membacakan ayat-ayat suci al-Qur‟an dan
beberapa doa-doa yang menenangkan hati dan jiwa. Prosesi ruqyah selain
digunakan untuk media penyembuhan, bisa juga digunakan untuk motivasi
dan sebagai sarana dakwah Islam.
Berdasarkan latarbelakang yang dipaparkan tersebut, maka pertanyaan
penelitiannya adalah (1) Bagaimana prosesi Ruqyah di Pondok Pesantren
Bani Mukhyar ? (2) Bagaimana resepsi Masyarakat Pondok Pesantren Bani
Mukhyar terhadap al-Qur‟an ?
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk (1) Untuk mengetahui prosesi Ruqyah di
Pondok Pesantren Bani Mukhyar. (2) Untuk mengetahui resepsi Masyarakat
pondok pesantren Bani Mukhyar terhadap al-Qur’an.
Dalam penelitian ini metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah
penelitian kualitatif deskriptif, dengan jenis penelitian lapangan (Field
Research). Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder.
Teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi..
Hasil penelitianmenunjukkan Media ruqyah yang dilakukan oleh Kyai
Azis terhadap masyarakat di Desa Sukamaju untuk mengatasi kesembuhan
pasien itu bervariasi, karena setiap penyakit yang pada diri seseorang itu
berbeda-beda, ada yang menggunakan tenaga medis dan ada yang
menggunakan ayat-ayat dan surat pilihan khusus untuk meruqyah, adapun
surat yang digunakan al-Fatihah, an-Nas, al-Falaq, al-Ikhlas,dan 7 ayat
pilihan (1) surat at-Taubah ayat 51. (2) surat Yunus ayat 107. (3) surat Hud
ayat 6. (4) surat Hud ayat 56. (5) surat al-Ankabut ayat 60. (6) surat Fatir
ayat 2. (7) surat az-Zumar ayat 38, lalu disertai dengan menggunakan air
minum
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 147K/Ag/2016 TENTANG HARTA BERSAMA
Get PDFPenelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh dilakukan terhadap putusan judex facti
yaitu putusan Pengadilan Agama Martapura Nomor 0705/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Mtp dan
putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Banjarmasin dengan Nomor:
0020/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Bjm tanggal 28 Mei 2015. Kedua putusan tersebut telah
menetapkan pasangan suami istri yang telah bercerai memperoleh hak yang sama
yaitu masing-masing mendapatkan setengah bagian. Perimbangan hak yang sama
tersebut tanpa mempertimbangkan kontribusi masing-masing terhadap perolehan
harta bersama tersebut. Ketentuan ini sejalan dengan norma harta bersama yang
tertuang dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Ketentuan putusan judex facti tersebut
ternyata berbeda dengan putusan judex juris, di mana Mahkamah Agung dalam
putusan Nomor 147K/Ag/2016 telah menetapkan hak atas harta bersama adalah,
suami mendapatkan 1/3 bagian dan istri mendapatkan 2/3 bagian. Oleh karena itu,
penulis merasa perlu melakukan kajian terhadap putusan tersebut, bagaimana
pertimbangan hakim Mahkamah Agung mengenai perkara pembagian harta
bersama pada Putusan Nomor 147K/Ag/2016 dan bagaimana analisis yuridis
mengenai Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 147K/Ag/2016 Tentang Harta
Bersama apakah putusan tersebut sudah sesuai dengan kajian ilmiah, sosial dan
keadilan. Semua pertanyaan yang diajukan penulis ini dirasakan perlu untuk
dijawab dengan tujuan mencari titik terang tentang bagaimana Pertimbangan
Mahkamah Agung tersebut.
Metode yang digunakan menurut jenisnya adalah kajian pustaka dan
termasuk penelitian Normatif. Sedangkan sifatnya menggunakan penelitian
analisis deskriptif.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, putusan Pengadilan Agama
Martapura Nomor 0705/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Mtp dan putusan Pengadilan Tinggi
Agama Banjarmasin dengan Nomor 0020/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Bjm secara umum
mengacu kepada Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan KUHPerdata yang tidak
membedakan pembagian harta bersama antara suami atau istri dan tidak
membedakan besarnya kontribusi masing-masing pihak sehingga masing-masing
pasangan suami istri memperoleh hak yang sama dari harta bersama tersebut.
Kedua, berdasarkan hasil penelusuran penulis mengkaji dan menganalisa berbagai
putusan tersebut menemukan bahwa, perbedaan mendasar antara pandangan judec
facti dengan judex juris dalam menetapkan besarnya hak harta bersama. Judec
facti cenderung menerapkan bunyi norma yang terdapat pada Kompilasi Hukum
Islam dan KUHPerdata, sementara judex juris lebih banyak menggali kaidah
keadilan, sehingga karena ada sisi keadilan yang perlu dipenuhi maka
perimbangan harta bersama tidak dilakukan secara berimbang. Adanya prestasi
xiii
yang dimiliki oleh pihak istri menjadi alasan bagi judex juris untuk menetapkan
besarnya hak atas harta bersama yang berbeda, pihak istri mendapatkan 2/3 bagian
dan sisanya untuk pihak suami. Dalam kajian hukum, sikap hakim yang berbeda
dengan peraturan adalah contra legem, di mana Hakim mempunyai alasan lain
sehingga harus menyimpangi ketentuan yang terdapat dalam undang-undang.
Dengan mempertimbangkan adanya prestasi yang berbeda antara suami dan istri,
Majelis Hakim Kasasi memandang perlu adanya kompensasi bagi salah satu pihak
yang mempunyai prestasi lebih. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menghadirkan
sebuah kaidah hukum Kompensasi menjadi salah satu bagian pertimbangan
contra legem pertimbangan Hakim.
xiv
ABSTRACK
Mukhyar; Juridical Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 147/Ag/2016
concerning Joint Assets, under the guidance of I: Prof. Dr. H. M. Fahmi
Al-Amruzi, M. Hum and II: Dr. Hj. Gusti Muzainah, M.H, at the Postgraduate
program of UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, 2021.
Keywords: Judge, Justice, Contra Legem
This research was motivated by the judex facti decision, namely the
decision of the Martapura Religious Court Number 0705/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Mtp and
the decision of the Banjarmasin Religious High Court Number:
0020/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Bjm dated 28 May 2015. both decisions have been decided
that a divorced husband and wife have the same rights, namely that each of them
gets half a share. The equality of the same rights without considering each
contribution in obtaining the joint property. This provision is in line with the
norms of joint property stated in the Islamic Law Compilation. The provisions of
the judex facti decision is different from the judex juris decision, where the
Supreme Court in its decision Number 147K/Ag/2016 has determined that the
right to joint property is, the husband gets 1/3 share and the wife gets 2/3 share.
Therefore, the author feels the need to conduct a study of that decision, how the
judges of the Supreme Court consider about the case of the distribution of joint
assets in Verdict Number 147K/Ag/2016 and how is the juridical analysis
regarding the Supreme Court Verdict Number 147K/Ag/2016 concerning Joint
Assets, whether the decision is in accordance with scientific, social and justice
studies. All the questions posed by the author are deemed necessary to be
answered with the aim of finding a solution on how the Supreme Court's
considerations are.
The method used by type is literature review and includes normative
research. While the method used by nature is descriptive analysis research.
The results show that first, the Martapura Religious Court’s verdict
Number 0705/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Mtp and the Banjarmasin Religious High Court’s
verdict Number 0020/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Bjm generally refers to the Islamic Law
Compilation and the KUHPerdata. which do not differentiate the distribution of
joint property between husband or wife and does not distinguish the amount of the
contribution of each party so that each husband and wife get the same rights from
the joint property. Second, based on the results of the study, the author examines
and analyzes various decisions and finds that the basic difference between the
judec facti and judex juris views in determining the amount of joint property
rights. Judec facti tends to implement the norms that contained in the Islamic Law
Compilation and the KUHPerdata, while judex juris more inclined the rules of
justice, because of there is a side of justice that needs to be fulfilled, The equality
of the joint assets is not done fairly. There are achievements owned by the wife is
the reason for the judex juris to determine the amount of rights in different joint
assets, the wife gets 2/3 of the share and the rest is for the husband. In legal
studies, the judge's attitude that is different from the regulations is contra legem,
xv
where the judge has other reasons so that he must deviate from the provisions
contained in the law. By considering there are different achievements between
husband and wife, the Panel of Judges Cassation considers the need for
compensation for one of the parties who has more achievements. In this study, the
author presents a pandect compensation as one part of the contra legem
consideration of the judge's consideration
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
