3 research outputs found
Aesthetic rehabilitation of upper central incisors using combined direct and indirect technique: A Case report
No full textImproving dental appearances generally leads to an increase in confidence, social interactions and ultimately quality of life. This case aimed to perform aesthetic rehabilitation on the upper central incisors. The patient was a 25-year-old female who was concerned with the gap in her front teeth and discolouration of her crown. The treatment started with shade matching and preliminary measurements prior to cementation of temporary crown. Later, an all ceramic e.max Lithium Disilicate crown was cemented on tooth 11 followed by direct composite restoration on tooth 21 for diastema closure. In conclusion, both the indirect and direct restorative technique when applied appropriately proved to be effective and satisfactory to the patient
Potential of fly ash geopolymer concrete as repairing and retrofitting solutions for marine infrastructure: A review
No full textCorrosion in maritime infrastructure, particularly in reinforced concrete, has emerged as a significant cause for concern due to the presence of chloride ions in seawater. To address this challenge, geopolymer concrete has been proposed as a viable solution for retrofitting and restoring marine structures. This review paper explores the potential application of fly ash geopolymer concrete in marine infrastructure restoration. Fly ash's properties make it ideal for marine infrastructure restoration. Its high levels of amorphous silica and alumina enable geopolymerization, forming a strong binder resistant to chloride corrosion. Its fine, spherical particles enhance concrete workability and density, improving mechanical strength and impermeability. This geopolymer binder offers excellent resistance to corrosion from chloride ions commonly found in seawater, making fly ash geopolymer concrete highly suitable for marine applications. Overall, fly ash's chemical composition and physical traits offer resilience and sustainability in restoring marine infrastructure, ensuring long-term durability against corrosion. This review paper explores the potential application of fly ash geopolymer concrete in marine infrastructure restoration. By examining the primary forms of damage and mechanisms underlying concrete degradation in marine settings, this study highlights the durability and sustainability of geopolymer concrete compared to traditional concrete. Additionally, it discusses current solutions for repairing and retrofitting concrete in marine environments, emphasizing the promising characteristics of geopolymer concrete for integration into such structures. Through this analysis, innovative and environmentally conscious approaches are introduced for addressing corrosion-related challenges in the maritime industry, offering a resilient solution for the construction of enduring marine structures. Finally, recommendations for further research on the application of fly ash geopolymer concrete in marine infrastructure restoration are presented
Damage of reinforced concrete beams consisting modified artificial polyethylene aggregate (MAPEA) under low impact load
No full textThe impact damage of reinforced concrete beams subjected to low velocity impact loading at the ultimate load range are explored. In this study, an impact tests is carried out on reinforced concrete beam consisting Modified Artificial Polyethylene Aggregate (MAPEA), where, an approximately 100 kg of impact weight were dropped three times onto the beam specimens until its fails. The waste plastic bags, that encapsulated by glass powder as known as MAPEA were used as the replacement of coarse aggregate. There are twelve beam specimens of size 120 mm x 150 mm x 800 mm are categorized into three groups, where each group consists of 4 specimens. The three groups denoted as normal reinforced concrete (NRC), reinforced concrete with MAPEA concrete block infill (RCAI) and reinforced concrete with 9% of MAPEA as a coarse aggregate (RC9A). All specimens were tested under low velocity impact loads under 0.32 m and 1.54 m (2.5 m/s & 5.5 m/s velocities) drop height of impact weight. The comparisons were made between the three types of beams under the aspect of failure (shear and flexural) and its final displacement. The result of the laboratory test showed that the RC9A beams produced less crack and low value of residual displacement
