24,714 research outputs found

    Track and Vertex Reconstruction on GPUs for the Mu3e Experiment

    No full text
    The Mu3e experiment searches for the lepton flavour violating decay μ → eee , aiming at a branching ratio sensitivity of 10 − 16 . A high precision tracking detector combined with timing detectors will measure the momenta, vertices and timing of the decay products of more than 10 9 muons/s stopped in the target. The trigger-less readout system will deliver about 100 GB/s of data. The implementation of a 3D tracking algorithm on a GPU is presented for usage in the online event selection. Together with a vertex fit this will allow for a reduction of the output data rate to below 100 M

    Status of the Mu3e Experiment at PSI

    No full text
    The Mu3e experiment aims to search for the lepton-flavour violating decay μ+ e+e+e\mu^+\rightarrow\ \text{e}^+ \text{e}^+ \text{e}^- with a sensitivity to one signal decay in 101610^{16} muon decays at a muon stopping rate of 2×109μs2\times 10^9 \frac{\mu}{\text{s}}. With currently available rates of 108μs10^8 \frac{\mu}{\text{s}}, a sensitivity on the branching ratio of 101510^{-15} is the aim of the first phase. This will allow for tests of new physics models with enhanced branching ratios for lepton-flavour violating processes with an unprecedented precision. The experiment must be operated at very high muon rates all the while suppressing the background of the decay μ+ e+ee+νμνe\mu^+\rightarrow\ \text{e}^+ \text{e}^- \text{e}^+ \overline{\nu}_\mu \nu_\text{e} and accidental electron-positron combinations. Therefore, a tracking detector made of thin pixel sensors with additional scintillating fibres and tiles for precise time measurement will be built. The development of the subdetectors is ongoing while detector construction is still in preparation

    The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks in Scientometrics

    Get PDF
    The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics was investigated at the level of individuals by using bibliographic data of all papers published in the international journal Scientometrics retrieved from the Science Citation Index (SCI) during 1978 to 2004. Combined analysis of social network analysis (SNA), co-occurrence analysis, cluster analysis and frequency analysis of words was explored to reveal: (1) The microstructure of the collaboration network on scientists’ aspects of scientometrics; (2) The major collaborative fields of the collaborative sub-networks; (3) The collaborative center of the collaboration network in scientometrics

    Collaboration in Iranian Scientific Publications

    No full text
    This study looks at international collaboration in Iranian scientific publications through the ISI Science Citation Index® (SCI) for the years 1995-1999, inclusive. These results are compared to and contrasted with the earlier findings for the periods covering 1985-1994 (Osareh & Wilson 2000). The results of Iran's increasing productivity over a 15-year period are presented. Iran doubled its output in the first two five-year periods and increased 2.8-fold from the second to the third five-year period. The rise in Iran's scientific publication output is due mainly to factors such as the ending of the war, better economic conditions, recent changes in the Iranian government's policy, basic changes in the political environment brought about by the Reformers, expansion of the Iranian presses for national publications, and the recent return of a large number of students trained overseas through government scholarships. External changes also account for the increased productivity, e.g., the acceptance of three Iranian source journals by the SCI, increased access to international databases through the Internet and better electronic communication facilities for international collaboration. One of the most important and significant factors that caused this dramatic rise seems to be the government's research policies in the last few years. Since 1999, the Iran Science, Research and Technology Ministry, has encouraged researchers to publish their non-Farsi language articles in highly ranked international scientific journals, for example, by giving prizes to researchers who publish their articles in ISI-ranked journals

    The methodological status of co-authorship networks

    No full text
    A powerful strategy within the study of collaboration in science is to posit that co-authorship patterns represent social networks. It is prerequisite to an application of Social Network Analysis (SNA) to define the network entities. A network analysis of the inter-institutional collaboration in COLLNET on the basis of co-authorships was conducted. The study reveals that it is crucial whether the co-authorship itself is seen as an author's relational property or as a social event that brings the authors together. The former possibility is represented by a onemode network in which each author can be related to each other author. Quite distinct from that are two-mode networks, the latter approach. They consist of two single data sets in which relations are only possible between different sets. Different modes of representations require different network approaches. One is that co-authorship networks are seen as one-mode networks, which has the advantage of the application of a variety of measures. In contrast, twomode networks, the other option, cannot be analysed by standard techniques but its distinctive features demand a new conceptualisation of measures. In conclusion, the two-mode perspective is more promising because it allows a dual perspective on collaboration in science which includes researchers as well as their scientific output

    Co-authorship Network of Scientometrics Research Collaboration

    Get PDF
    This paper examines the co-authorship network in the field of scientometrics using social network analysis techniques with the aim of developing an understanding of research collaboration in this scientific community. Using co-authorship data from 3125 articles published in the journal Scientometrics with a time span of more than three decades (1980-2012), we construct an evolving co-authorship network and calculate three centrality measures (closeness, betweenness, and degree) for 3024 authors, 1207 institutions, 68 countries and 22 academic fields in this network. This paper also discusses the usability of centrality measures in author ranking, and suggests that centrality measures can be useful indicators for impact analysis. Findings revealed that scientometrics was not dominated by a couple of key researchers as quite a significant number of popular researchers were identified. The United States occupies the topmost position in all measures except for degree centrality. The most active, central and collaborative academic discipline in scientometrics is Information & Library Science

    Das HV-MAPS basierte MuPix Teleskop

    No full text
    Das Mu3e-Experiment sucht nach dem Zerfall eines Myons in zwei Positronen und einem Elektron, welcher nach dem Standardmodell sehr stark unterdrückt und somit nicht beobachtbar ist. Um die geplante Sensitivität von einem in 1016 zu erreichen, müssen 109 Myonenzerfälle pro Sekunde beobachtet werden. Der Spurdetektor wird aus mit Hochspannung betriebenen dünnen monolithischen aktiven Pixelsensoren (HV-MAPS) gebaut. Da diese auf bis zu 50 µm gedünnt werden können, eignen sie sich ideal um niederenergetische Teilchen zu detektieren. Der aktelle Sensorprototyp ist der MuPix7. Um die Detektorkomponenten und die Datennahme des Mu3e-Detektors zu testen wurde ein Strahlteleskop aus HV-MAPS realisiert. Dieses wurde für den Einsatz an verschiedenen Standorten optimiert, basiert auf optomechanischen Komponenten und zeichnet sich durch hohe Flexibilität und schnellen Aufbau sowie Kalibration aus.In diesem Vortrag werden die Funktionsweise des Teleskops, Testergebnisse aus drei Teststrahlkampagnen, bei denen Trefferraten von 1 MHz erreicht wurden, sowie aktuelle Leistungsverbesserungen vorgestellt

    Searching for Charged Lepton Flavour Violation with Mu3e

    Get PDF
    The observation of lepton flavour violation (LFV) in the charged lepton sector would be an unambiguous sign of physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM), and thus, it is the channel of choice for many BSM searches. LFV searches in muon decays in particular benefit from the fact that muons can be easily produced at high rates. There is a global effort to search for LFV at high-intensity muon sources to which the upcoming Mu3e experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) will contribute. The Mu3e Collaboration aims to perform a background-free search for the LFV decay μ+e+ee+\mu^+\to e^+e^-e^+ with an unprecedented sensitivity in the order of 101510^{-15} in the first phase of operation and 101610^{-16} in the final phase - an improvement over the preceding SINDRUM experiment by four orders of magnitude. The high muon stopping rates and low momenta of the decay electrons make high demands on momentum and time resolution and on the data acquisition. The innovative experimental concept is based on a tracking detector built from novel ultra-thin silicon pixel sensors and scintillating fibres and tiles as well as online event reconstruction and filtering in real time.Comment: 6 pages, 5 figures, proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators (NuFACT 2022

    Measuring author influence in scientific collaboration networks

    No full text
    Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to measure author influence in scientific collaboration networks by considering the combined effects of multiple indexes. In the meanwhile, we intend to explore a method to avoid assigning subjective weights. Design/methodology/approach: We applied four centrality measures (degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality and eigenvector centrality) and authors&#39; published papers to the scientific collaboration network. The grey relational analysis (GRA) method based on information entropy was used to measure an author&#39;s impact in the collaboration network. The weight of each evaluation index was determined based on information entropy. The ACM SIGKDD collaboration network was selected as an example to demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of our method. Findings: Author influence was not always positively correlated with evaluation indexes such as degree centrality and betweenness centrality. This implies that combined effects of multiple indexes should be considered in author impact analysis. The introduction of the GRA method based on information entropy can reduce the interference of human factors in the evaluation process. Research limitations: We only analyzed author influence from the perspective of scientific collaboration, but the impact of citation on author influence was ignored. Practical implications: The proposed method can be also applied to detect influential authors in bibliographic co-citation network, author co-citation network, bibliographic coupling network or author coupling network. It would help facilitate scientific collaboration and enhance scholarly communication. Originality/value: This paper proposes an analytical method of evaluating author influence in scientific collaboration networks, in which combined effects of multiple indexes are considered and the interference of human factors is reduced in the evaluation process. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to measure author influence in scientific collaboration networks by considering the combined effects of multiple indexes. In the meanwhile, we intend to explore a method to avoid assigning subjective weights. Design/methodology/approach: We applied four centrality measures (degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality and eigenvector centrality) and authors&#39; published papers to the scientific collaboration network. The grey relational analysis (GRA) method based on information entropy was used to measure an author&#39;s impact in the collaboration network. The weight of each evaluation index was determined based on information entropy. The ACM SIGKDD collaboration network was selected as an example to demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of our method. Findings: Author influence was not always positively correlated with evaluation indexes such as degree centrality and betweenness centrality. This implies that combined effects of multiple indexes should be considered in author impact analysis. The introduction of the GRA method based on information entropy can reduce the interference of human factors in the evaluation process. Research limitations: We only analyzed author influence from the perspective of scientific collaboration, but the impact of citation on author influence was ignored. Practical implications: The proposed method can be also applied to detect influential authors in bibliographic co-citation network, author co-citation network, bibliographic coupling network or author coupling network. It would help facilitate scientific collaboration and enhance scholarly communication. Originality/value: This paper proposes an analytical method of evaluating author influence in scientific collaboration networks, in which combined effects of multiple indexes are considered and the interference of human factors is reduced in the evaluation process.</div

    Inter-institutional scientific collaboration: an approach from social network

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a tool that can be used to characterize, analyze and interpret the patterns of collaboration among institutions by means of the visual display of scientific information. These graphic representations allow for a combined analysis of a given institution in the system of relations (network), and of the particular attributes of that institution (indicators). The tool affords the possibility of regenerating the network to make any number of aggregates appear or disappear, thus allowing one to focus on institutional sectors, geographic regions, etc. It also allows for analysis of sectorial interaction, institutional backing of research, and the influence of geographic proximity, linguistic affinity, or regional politics. This is indeed a versatile analytical tool, and it is bound to prove its potential for evaluating patterns of collaborative research, development and innovation
    corecore