1,723,137 research outputs found
Fotografía UDBC034586
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Moreno, G. 3, determinado como Ageratina arbutifoli
Fotografía UDBC034532
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Moreno, G. 1, determinado como Bejaria aestuan
Fotografía UDBC047506
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Moreno, G. 11, determinado como Andea adusta en el año 202
Fotografía UDBC034585
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Moreno, G. 2, determinado como Cavendishia bracteata en el año 201
Fotografía UDBC048883
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Moreno, G. 12, determinado como Andea homeieri en el año 202
Fotografía UDBC021572
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Moreno, G., determinado como Pentacalia vaccinioides en el año 200
Fotografía UDBC048882
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Moreno, G. 12, determinado como Andea homeieri en el año 202
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
