1,720,960 research outputs found

    Acute toxicity of all-trans-retinoic acid loaded poly(L-lactide)/poly(ethylene glycol)-poly (L-lactide) microspheres in mice

    No full text
    Previously, poly(L-lactide) microspheres containing retinoic acid (RA) had been prepared for parenteral administration in order to overcome "acute retinoic acid resistance." In this study, acute toxicities of RA-loaded microspheres were investigated in mice after the microspheres were injected intramuscularly. The maximum dose of RA in the microspheres was determined by considering both the injection volume and dispersion of microspheres in the vehicle media, and the close levels were determined to be 0, 90, 180, and 360 mg RA/kg. Mice were carefully observed for any clinical signs for 14 days, and gross observation of the organs was performed at 14 days. When a dose of 90 mg RA/kg was administered, no severe toxicities were observed; however, with the administration of 180 and 360 mg RA/kg, abnormal appearances of organs, such as discolor, atrophy, hemorrhage, etc., were observed. There were no mortalities or bone fractures observed at any of the doses, In our previous study of cancer treatment using the RA-loaded microspheres, the growth of herd and neck carcinoma in athymic nude mice was successfully inhibited at the dose of 100 mg RA/kg. It was concluded that a dose of approximately 90 mg RA/kg of the RA-loaded microspheres would be most desirable for cancer therapy. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

    In vivo biocompatibility studies of poly(D,L-lactide)/poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(L-lactide) microspheres containing all-trans-retinoic acid

    No full text
    Biocompatibility studies of all-trans-retinoic acid (RA)-loaded microspheres were carried out after they were subcutaneously injected into rats. To characterize the inflammatory response to these microspheres, tissue reactions at the implantation site and cell types in the interstices of the microspheres were evaluated for 180 days. On the 15th day, the cross-sectional area of the fibrous capsules surrounding the implantation site of the RA-loaded microspheres was four times larger than that of the control microspheres. The size of the fibrous capsules surrounding the implantation site of the RA-loaded microspheres decreased significantly over a period of 75 days, while the size of the fibrous capsules surrounding the implantation site of the control microspheres remained almost constant throughout the entire course of 180 days. The tissue response to the RA-loaded microspheres was more intensified by the increased extensive cellular infiltration of macrophages, granulation tissue, and fibrosis than that to the control microspheres. The difference in the inflammatory response between the RA-loaded microspheres and the control microspheres was significant for 75 days after implantation. It was suggested that the released RA from the microspheres stimulated inflammatory responses. However, no further enhanced inflammation reactions were detected after RA had been completely released from the microspheres

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore